April 24, 2018
RESOURCE COMMITTEE
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Barry Petten, MHA for Conception Bay South,
substitutes for Tracey Perry, MHA for Fortune Bay - Cape La Hune.
The
Committee met at 6:03 p.m. in the Assembly Chamber.
CHAIR (Warr):
Okay, if we can get
ourselves comfortable, we will begin.
Good
evening everybody. Welcome to the Estimates of the Department of Advanced
Education, Skills and Labour.
Just a
note that Mr. Petten is substituting for Ms. Perry tonight and the first thing
I'll ask is the Committee to introduce themselves, starting with Mr. Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Barry
Petten, MHA for Conception Bay South.
MR. SHEPPARD:
James Sheppard, Researcher, Official Opposition.
MS. MICHAEL:
Lorraine Michael, MHA, St.
John's East - Quidi Vidi.
MR. MORGAN:
Ivan Morgan, Researcher, NDP caucus.
MR. FINN:
John Finn, MHA, Stephenville
- Port au Port.
MR. BRAGG:
Derrick Bragg, MHA, Fogo
Island - Cape Freels.
MR. DEAN:
Jerry Dean, MHA, Exploits.
CHAIR:
My name is Brian Warr; I'm
the MHA for Baie Verte - Green Bay and your Chair for this evening.
Minister, we will offer you some opening remarks. I'd like for your staff to
introduce themselves as well.
MR. HAWKINS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
To make
sure the mics are working – Al Hawkins, Minister of Advanced Education, Skills
and Labour – I'll let my staff introduce to make sure we're all online.
MS. DOOLING:
Good evening. I'm Genevieve Dooling, Deputy Minister.
MR. HANLON:
Brendan Hanlon, Departmental Controller.
MS. DUNPHY:
Debbie Dunphy, Assistant Deputy Minister of Corporate Services and Policy.
MS. ENNIS-WILLIAMS:
Hi, I'm Candice Ennis-Williams; I'm ADM, Post-Secondary Education.
MS. LANGOR:
Hi, Fiona Langor, Assistant Deputy Minister, Workforce Development, Labour and
Immigration.
MR. MAVIN:
Walt Mavin, Director of Employment and Training Programs.
MS. O'BRIEN:
Donna O'Brien, Assistant Deputy Minister for Regional Services.
MS. PITCHER:
Margot Pitcher, Executive Assistant to Minister Hawkins.
MS. HOWARD:
Jacquelyn Howard, Director of Communications.
MR. BRANTON:
Glenn Branton, CEO, Labour Relations Board.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Just
before we get started, I'd just remind the staff of the department if you're
asked to speak just say your name and wait for your tally light to light up.
It's most helpful for the Broadcast Centre, so we'd appreciate that.
Minister, if you'd like to start off with a few remarks?
MR. HAWKINS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I
certainly thank you –
CHAIR:
I'm sorry.
CLERK (Hammond):
(Inaudible.)
CHAIR:
Okay. Thank you.
CLERK:
(Inaudible) procedure.
CHAIR:
I'll ask the Clerk to call
the first subhead.
CLERK:
1.1.01.
CHAIR:
Shall 1.1.01 carry?
Mr.
Minister.
MR. HAWKINS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I
certainly thank you for the opportunity to discuss the Estimates, the budget
relating to Advanced Education, Skills and Labour. I want to say thank you to my
colleagues, the interest that they have and look forward to some questioning
with regard to what we have budgeted within the department.
I'll
just make a few comments before we get into the questioning piece. It's a
pleasure for me to represent a department such as Advanced Education, Skills and
Labour. I took over as minister at the end of July 31, the 1st of August. It's
certainly been a rewarding eight months since that change. I know the first few
months trying to embrace all the changes and trying to embrace all of the
different functions and programs within Advanced Education, Skills and Labour
was a challenge but, hopefully, I'm getting there.
Whether
through skills training, student financial assistance, immigration, labour
relations, or various socio-economic supports, the objective of the Department
of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour is one and that's to help the people.
We are guided by the philosophy that we should do everything possible to meet
our commitments in The Way Forward to
enable people to live independent and fulfilling lives. We want to ensure that
only the best of services and programs are offered to Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians to help them achieve employment and independence.
Over
the past year, the department has marked significant milestones in immigration,
skills training, apprenticeship and labour legislation. I'm going to highlight
some of these, and I know probably some of them will come up in the questions.
But just in case we don't get a chance to discuss that, I wanted to highlight
some of these initiatives that we had.
Twenty-five of the 39 initiatives, Mr. Chair, of
The Way Forward on Immigration in
Newfoundland and Labrador, our five-year Immigration Action Plan, were
initiated or implemented by the end of the 2017-18 fiscal year. This includes
measures such as convening the Minister's Roundtable on Immigration with the
first round table held in February, expanding newcomer settlement services
throughout the province and supporting the foreign qualification recognition. In
partnership with the federal government we expanded the Atlantic Apprenticeship
Harmonization Project to include six additional trades and we will continue to
work on increasing that as well.
We also
completed preparations to introduce an online training option in 2018-2019 for
five of the trades, enabling apprentices to continue working while completing
the training they require for journeyperson certification. We think this is a
very important move because we've heard complaints in the past that some of the
apprentices would have to conclude their employment in order to get their
training. Now, we're going to be providing that opportunity so they can do
online training and still continue their employment.
We
passed amendments to the Labour Standards
Act that align with changes to the
Canada Labour Code to enable working parents to access the new federal
parental leave benefits introduced, job-protected leave of up to 17 weeks to
provide care for critically-ill adult family members and to expand the
eligibility for critically-ill child care leave to include immediate and
extended family members. The amendments also enable nurse practitioners to
provide medical certificates to verify entitlement for new and existing leaves
under the Labour Standards Act which
should make it easier rather than having the physician make that determination.
I'd
like to take a few moments to share some of the highlights from
Budget 2018 and then turn it over to
the Committee to ask the questions. In the budget this year our government has
allocated a total of $366 million for Memorial University, which includes $55
million for the faculty of medicine in recognition of its critical role in the
province's society, culture and economy. That's significant, Mr. Chair. That's
more than New Brunswick provides for its four universities and almost as much as
Nova Scotia provides for all 10 of its universities.
Put
another way, this provincial funding represents approximately 80 per cent of
Memorial University's general operating revenues compared to the Canadian
average of 49 per cent. It works out to be a public investment of over $22,000
per full-time student. This funding helps Memorial University deliver
high-quality programming more affordably than anywhere else in Atlantic Canada
and well below the national average. Canadian and international students can
currently complete an undergraduate engineering degree at Memorial University
for about three times less cost than the average elsewhere in Canada. There is
$87.6 million, this year's budget, in operating funding provided for the College
of the North Atlantic and its 17 campuses.
As you
can see, our commitment to accessible, affordable, post-secondary education
remains strong. Budget 2018 allocates
$73.1 million to enable current tuition levels to be maintained for Newfoundland
and Labrador students. This includes an increase of $4 million for Memorial
University and $1.1 million for the College of the North Atlantic in 2018.
This
year we also announced an independent review of the public post-secondary
education system, which will explore how our post-secondary education system
compares to other jurisdictions, and recommend options to achieve better
outcomes in a more cost-efficient manner. That really piggybacks on the
Premier's Task Force for the K to 12, so we felt it was very timely to look at
post-secondary institutions.
The
provincial government continues to invest significantly in infrastructure at our
public post-secondary institutions and through our strong partnership with
federal government as well. Budget 2018
allocates $55.6 million to the province's public post-secondary institutions for
infrastructure projects. They include: $25.1 million provided for the Memorial
University's Core Science Facility, $13.6 million allocated for the construction
of the Centre of Excellence for Heavy Equipment and Industrial Trades at College
of the North Atlantic and $10.8 million to support the construction of
Memorial's Animal Resource Centre.
Budget 2018
provides funding for programs and services to maintain the province's skilled
workforce and prepare Newfoundlanders and Labradorians for emerging and future
labour demands. As a continuation of our government's commitment on
The Way Forward to expand
agriculture, aquaculture, oil and gas and technology sectors, we are supporting
career development opportunities for youth by allocating $196,000 for a new
Student Mentorship Program.
Budget 2018
also includes an investment of $13.1 million to delivering employment and
training programs; $6.1 million for youth-focused employment and career related
activities; $1.3 million to build capacity and provide online training in the
apprenticeship system; $641,000 in federal government funding this year to
establish the Atlantic Apprenticeship Harmonization office in this province – a
first for Newfoundland and Labrador and we're proud of that – and $230,000 cost
shared among the four Atlantic provinces for the establishment of an Atlantic
Workforce Partnership Secretariat in this province, another first for the
province.
Our
government will invest $2.4 million, in addition to the $1 million in federal
funding, to support the continued implementation of
The Way Forward on Immigration in
Newfoundland and Labrador with a goal to increase immigration by 50 per cent
to 1,700 newcomers annually by 2022. It's important to point out the provincial
government continues to work with our federal colleagues to access federal
funding where possible to support programs and services for Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians.
We've
had great success in identifying opportunities to leverage federal funding. The
examples of this include the establishment of the Atlantic Apprenticeship
Harmonization office in this province and the Post-Secondary Institutions
Strategic Investment Fund which has given us significant federal funding.
We have
recently finalized a new generation of labour market transfer agreements with
the federal government which will provide almost $900 million to support
employment and training programs over six years. This represents an increase
over previous agreements of over $80 million over a six-year period for this
province. Using federal funding strategically, and ensuring available funds are
fully utilized, helps reduce pressure on the Provincial Treasury. These are just
some of the highlights of this year's budget. Of course, it will be interesting
now as we delve into some of the line items.
Mr.
Chair, I will attempt to answer the questions to the best of my ability. If I
can't, I certainly have more than adequate staff that are capable of answering
the questions.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Minister.
Mr.
Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
1.1.01.
Minister's Office; what positions are included under the Salaries?
MR. HAWKINS:
I didn't hear the question, Mr. Chair.
MR. PETTEN:
In 1.1.01 what positions are included in the Salaries line?
MR. HAWKINS:
That would be the minister, the executive assistant and, certainly, the
departmental secretary would be included. You're looking at three staff.
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah, sure.
Travel
and Communications; what was this used for?
MR. HAWKINS:
Travel and Communications? As you noticed, of course, we had budgeted $59,000 in
2017-18 and down to $55,900. Part of that was, as I said before, we have put in
zero-based budgeting; we have looked at opportunities where we can save as much
as possible. There were lower district travel requirements for me during '18-'19
from Grand Falls-Windsor to St. John's versus having to travel to Corner Brook.
With the new minister coming in, there were some slight changes with regard to
that amount.
MR. PETTEN:
1.2.01, Executive Support.
MR. HAWKINS:
1.2.01.
MR. PETTEN:
The revised amount was $59,300 less than what was budgeted. It was back up to
the ….
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, that's the salary piece. Between budget 2017-18 and the revised we had a
change within the department; there was an ADM who left our department and
became a deputy minister in another department. The salary adjustment on that
would have been what you see in the difference there in the $50,000.
MR. PETTEN:
1.2.02, what about the number of positions in that Salaries line in this
compared to last year, in the previous year?
MR. HAWKINS:
I can tell you that we do have – I think it is 56 positions that we have
currently in that section there. You will also notice there was a decrease.
We've changed the medical transportation staff; we're transferring them to the
Department of Health and Community Services.
You'll
see further on in our Estimates we'll pick up the other 15, but in this
particular decreasing and budgeting there, it relates to two positions that we
have transferred. You'll see the other 15 positions with a reduction in salary
later in our Estimates.
MR. PETTEN:
The reduction in the Transportation and Communications, is that a result of
those staff moving as well?
MR. HAWKINS:
There is no reduction. What we're doing is we're taking 17 positions that were
doing the transportation in AESL and we're transferring 17 positions to Health
and Community Services because we feel there are better efficiencies in that. We
don't have the duplication and they can better control exactly how the
transportation – sometimes there have been complaints; one department handling
this type of transportation and Health and Community Services handling another
type of transportation.
Now, at
least it's streamlined and we don't have that duplication piece. We've actually
taken the amount of money, plus the 17 positions, and transferred to Health and
Community Services.
MR. PETTEN:
My reference was to the Transportation and Communications line.
MR. HAWKINS:
Oh, I'm sorry.
MR. PETTEN:
It's $46,000 this year down from $74,000.
MR. HAWKINS:
We've had a slight reduction there. Basically we've cut some travel down for
audits and we're going to be doing one audit per year. Don't get alarmed at that
in saying that audits are not going to be done; we still have a fair number with
federal funding. There's federal programming involved so they do external audits
anyway. It was a cost-saving in that we were able to reduce and just do the one
versus what was there previously.
MR. PETTEN:
The Revenue line there, could you explain what that is? What's included in that
revenue?
MR. HAWKINS:
It went from $200,000 to $700,000. There's a $510,000 differential. That's an
increase due to funding that was returned from a previous year for community
partnership groups. We just picked up that funding when they transferred
through. That's the $510,000 that's there.
MR. PETTEN:
When you say community partnership groups, what groups would you be referring
to?
MR. HAWKINS:
Do we have a specific one? We have the spinal cord?
I can
give you a breakdown on that one. The provincial revenue includes: reimbursement
from the Nunatsiavut Government for AB delivery of $66K; unspent 2016-17 grant
funding from organizations such as Visions of $16K; (inaudible) and place $22K;
Murphy Centre $34K; Marine Resource $34K; MUN $75K; Spinal Cord Injury
Association $35K, and there are some other smaller ones.
MR. PETTEN:
That was funding they never
used? Is that correct?
MR. HAWKINS:
Correct. That was not used
so it was returned to us.
MR. PETTEN:
Is there any way we can get
that list?
MR. HAWKINS:
Absolutely.
MR. PETTEN:
1.2.03, Program Development
And Planning. There was an increase in Salaries by $200,000-plus. What were the
increase in positions here? Because I notice it's dropped down again this year.
MR. HAWKINS:
That's through the
attrition, the retirement continuance costs of personnel moving out. That was
part of the attrition retirement piece we have to pay out in severance and that
sort of thing. So it is extra costs involved.
MR. PETTEN:
How many positions were
involved there?
MR. HAWKINS:
Positions that we had there
– we have 16 there now. I'm not so sure.
OFFICIAL:
There are three.
MR. HAWKINS:
There are three positions.
OFFICIAL:
Three positions that were
tied up with severance.
MR. HAWKINS:
There were three positions
with the severance.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
An
attrition plan; speaking of attrition, what are your numbers this year in
attrition from last year to this year?
MR. HAWKINS:
Specifically, in what area?
MR. PETTEN:
I guess within the
department.
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, the department is
fairly large as you know and we've had positions over a number of years that
we've looked at through attrition. For 2018-2019, through our attrition we're
looking probably at around 13 positions. That's throughout the entire
department.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Grants
and Subsidies, what groups or organizations receive these?
MR. HAWKINS:
That would be grants –
Newfoundland and Labrador Association for Community Living would be one; the
habit community English as a second language thrust, would be another one;
Rotary Club of Exploits. That would be three of them.
This is
a very small grant and subsidy area, and maybe because of where ministers
changed partway through the year there was not a big uptake on that. Again, it's
a very, very small grant. So that would have been the three that got it in the
last year.
MR. PETTEN:
A lot of these groups didn't
apply last year? Is that what happened –?
MR. HAWKINS:
No, actually – it depends on
if there's a special project that's out there, a small project that someone may
want to avail of for a particular service, then they would certainly have the
ability to apply under that small grant.
MR. PETTEN:
2.1.01; under the Salaries
line there was an increase in the revised but now it's back down by $1.7 million
this year.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. Right there, that's
where we capture the 15 positions that we have transferred out to Health and
Community Services. You will find that adjustment there within the salary piece.
So that captures those 15 positions.
MR. PETTEN:
When you say for community
services, where exactly are –
MR. HAWKINS:
Health and Community
Services.
MR. PETTEN:
Health and Community
Services, sorry. I'm partially deaf, too.
Will
there be any impacts as a result of this, Minister?
MR. HAWKINS:
No. The only impacts that we
feel are going to be positive impacts because, as I said, it will probably
eliminate some of the confusion that sometimes exist when clients are applying
for medical transportation, and at least now it will be streamlined. It's under
one department. So I think there would be significant improvement in the
services that will be provided.
Again,
like I said, it's no reduction in staff. It's just a matter of more – getting in
line with almost like a one-stop shop when it comes to providing these services.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
3.1.01,
under Salaries there's almost $100,000 more than last year. Are there extra
positions, or what ….
MR. HAWKINS:
That is attributed to an increase due to a senior policy development position we
have there. It is responsible for after-hours services, emergencies, social
services charge. It's charged to income support, but funding for this position
was not moved from the policy division. So we're picking up the cost of the
senior policy development position.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Allowances and Assistance, a $3.6 million reduction.
MR. HAWKINS:
Allowances and Assistance, 09, a decrease again. Another one of the moves that
we've made. We've moved our shelter funding to Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corp. Again, we feel that it's probably the best place where that should be.
Anything having to do with emergency shelter, shelter funding and that sort of
thing, it certainly would make more sense for that to be in the Newfoundland and
Labrador Housing Corp. so they can better manage. So what we have basically done
is we've decreased our budget and we have transferred that funding to
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corp.
MR. PETTEN:
Were there positions that
went with this?
MR. HAWKINS:
No positions went with that.
Just the money.
MR. PETTEN:
Just the money. There is no
concern on the delivery of service, changing them from one department to
another, but no –
MR. HAWKINS:
No, we just feel that was
the right thing to do. We feel it will improve efficiencies and improve the
ability to be able to properly manage shelters of all types. Certainly,
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corp. is already providing housing and it
would make sense for that to be under their purview versus Advanced Education,
Skills and Labour dealing with housing.
MR. PETTEN:
This amount is the same now
over in the Housing Corp.? The amount is still $3.6 million?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, $3.6 million is what
went to them to provide that shelter.
MR. PETTEN:
What about the employees who
administered this program in the department? Did they move to another
department, or what happened to the employees?
MR. HAWKINS:
Do you want to answer that
one for me, please?
MS. DOOLING:
The employees that managed this when it was with Advanced Education, Skills and
Labour, this was just a small part of their job. We did a workload analysis
prior to transferring the funding over to Newfoundland and Labrador Housing.
While no positions transferred over, the Housing Corporation had positions
available that could handle this work once it was transferred.
The
individuals in the Department of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour stayed
where they were. They continued to work on other components of the income
support file, but the housing is transferred over now to the Housing Corporation
and they have positions that will carry out the work.
We have
an implementation and transition plan. We'll work with them through the
transition to make sure there's a smooth transition of the emergency services
over to the Housing Corporation.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Petten.
Ms.
Michael, nice to see you again this evening.
MS. MICHAEL:
The second time today.
CHAIR:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
A long day.
MR. HAWKINS:
Long for punishment.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
CHAIR:
Ms. Michael, thank you.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Chair.
I would
like to ask a question actually, exactly where you were just now in answering
Mr. Petten. I know this emergency money – because sometimes my assistant has to,
at midnight, be looking for emergency shelter. Marianne always knew exactly
where to call and where to go. What happens with the transition for somebody
like her who's doing her job?
MR. HAWKINS:
The transition; again, like
I said, I firmly believe there will be significant improvement for that because
at least now we know where to contact. That information will be out, the
marketing will be done and Newfoundland and Labrador Housing will provide that,
making sure there are no gaps within that transfer.
That's
a piece of work they will continue to do and we'll continue to monitor as well.
The last thing we want is if there's an emergency situation, someone not knowing
where they have to contact. That information will be out and will be distributed
to our clients and to anyone that's been availing of these services.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
I would
suggest I think constituency assistants really need to know.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you very much.
I
totally agree with what you're doing. It's the same way with the other piece
that you're putting over to NLHC as well. It makes all the sense in the world
that's where the money should be – or no, the travel money under medical, that
just makes all the sense in the world. I'm just thinking through Marianne's
experience. I know the many times that she's had to avail of that for
constituents.
I'd
like to come back. I usually don't. It's only if something I want to ask hasn't
been covered.
2.1.01,
under Transportation and Communications there is a change there. The budget for
last year was $832,000, the revision was $681,300 and now the Estimate for this
year is $766,200, so just a brief explanation, Minister, of all of those
variations.
MR. HAWKINS:
Thanks. That's a good
question.
A lot
of last year we put an emphasis on looking at discretionary travel. Any areas
that we found discretionary we tried to avoid. We did a fair amount of video
conferencing as well, versus travelling and, of course, we did a lot of
conference calls. Those were just some of the areas we cut.
One of
the other points in that Transportation and Communications area was that we
found the cost of postage was down. That's obvious because if you do more
electronic communication, then you're going to reduce that. What we've basically
done is we've adjusted slightly up but significantly less than budget of
2017-18.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you very much.
Under
Purchased Services there's also a bit of variation here. It's not a lot but it
was $367,800 budgeted, $321,600 revision and then still down $348,700 in this
year's Estimate.
MR. HAWKINS:
This, again, was
interesting. Our copying costs came in less than what we had anticipated. There
was a fair difference there, actually, in the copying. We've just made a slight
adjustment going forward in 2018-2019 but, surprisingly, that was one of the
areas that we had less cost. Some of the other was attributed to – our business
insurance cost was a little bit lower than we anticipated.
MS. MICHAEL:
Would the copying there be
copying of information handouts for clients, that kind of thing?
MR. HAWKINS:
Documents.
MS. MICHAEL:
Documents, right.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
I just
want to check backwards and see was there anything else back there. No, I think
that's okay – wait now, no, I'm going the wrong way.
It's
not a big thing but 1.2.03.
MR. HAWKINS:
1.2.03. Okay.
MS. MICHAEL:
Under Professional Services
$33,800 was budgeted, the revision was $20,500 and now $19,800. First of all,
what would those professional services be and why the change?
MR. HAWKINS:
I think that one would relate to the income support Appeal Board. That would be
per diems that would have been paid out to the Appeal Board. There's a reduction
there for '17-'18 in the per diems paid out.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you very much.
I think
we've taken care of 3.1.01. Under federal revenue which is 01 –
MR. HAWKINS:
Which tab?
MS. MICHAEL:
Oh, I'm sorry, 3.1.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay, Income Assistance.
MS. MICHAEL:
Under federal revenue I'm just curious, what was that $45,000 budgeted? Nothing
seemed to happen with that.
MR. HAWKINS:
That's the agreement we had with the Innu. Of course, all of the services now
have been devolved to the Innu Nation.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
The federal funding will be going to them versus us having to supply the
services and then charge out. That's completely devolved to the Innu Nation now.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you.
The
provincial revenue is $5.5 million and this year keeping $5.5 million, but there
was $500,000 unspent or actually revised in '17-'18.
MR. HAWKINS:
We sort of try to determine what the collection rates are going to be. We had
budgeted $5.5 million for collections. Actually, our collections were down and
so there's a discrepancy of about $500,000 in our collections. We've again
conservatively estimated our collections will run about $5.5 million. That was
what happened there, some of our collections are down in that last year.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right, but doing the zero-based budgeting it looks like you should keep the
$500,000.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you.
3.1.02,
the National Child Benefit Reinvestment; I'm curious about the $60,000
difference.
MR. HAWKINS:
It's interesting because you probably would think that income support would be
increasing, but the number of families with children in receipt of income
support continues to decrease. This year, we have 28 fewer than we had one year
ago, which I guess maybe is positive. In addition, a number of families with
children under the age 12 that are eligible for child care has decreased over an
11-year period from 6,013 in 2006 to 3,777 in 2017.
MS. MICHAEL:
So is it more the numbers of
children that's decreasing or the numbers of families?
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, we all know what's
happening in families.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
MR. HAWKINS:
The number of children are
obviously decreasing.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
We see that in our schools.
We see it in our College of the North Atlantic. We see it in our Memorial
University and we see it in our private training institution. If we look at,
historically, over the last three years, we're averaging roughly about 10 per
cent reduction in enrollments. That's simply – I shouldn't say simply, but it's
primarily because of the fact that we're having less and less graduates that are
coming out of high school. So all of that adds to the fact that there are less
and less services in this area required.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
Well,
in the next section, 3.1.03, I'm suspecting that's one of the reasons there as
well, fewer children –
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
– because under Allowance
and Assistance in particular is what I'm looking at.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
It's gone down there, so I'm
assuming –
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, the same.
MS. MICHAEL:
– the numbers are going
down.
MR. HAWKINS:
Ms. Michael, in the past
five years, we've gone from an average of 387 clients per month to an average of
148 clients.
MS. MICHAEL:
That's a jump, holy cow.
MR. HAWKINS:
In 2017-2018.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Ms. Michaels.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Thank
you, Mr. Chair.
CHAIR:
Mr. Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
3.2.01
MR. HAWKINS:
3.2.01, let's go back up,
Income Assistance.
MR. PETTEN:
The next page.
There's
an increase in Salaries there of $185,000 from last year's budgeted amount, but
then it's gone back down to a little over that again for this year. What's the
fluctuation there?
MR. HAWKINS:
I think I might have
referenced that earlier, Mr. Petten. It's due to a senior policy development
position that's there, if I'm on the right one you're on, 3.1.01.
MR. PETTEN:
No, 3.2.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
3.2.01, I'm sorry, my
apologizes.
MR. PETTEN:
I'll forgive you.
MR. HAWKINS:
It's been a long day.
MR. PETTEN:
I know.
MR. HAWKINS:
I'm not getting any younger
either.
Okay,
so 3.2.01 and you're talking about the reduction there, that again is our
management restructuring and I think it probably equates to four positions.
That, again, is through some of the salary continuance costs related to the
management restructuring.
MR. PETTEN:
It went up by $185,000 and
now it's dropped down.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, because we would have
had attrition costs with regard to the management restructuring. You either
would have had severance or salary continuation or there are a couple of other
areas.
MR. PETTEN:
What were those positions?
Do you have any idea what they were or what their titles were?
MR. HAWKINS:
I don't have that list with
me but if you want, we can provide that to you.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay, thanks.
Purchased Services, what is included in this in this division?
MR. HAWKINS:
Purchased Services, that
basically would be copying, copying machine, copier; printing services is
basically what that would be. We had really lower than anticipated cost for that
in last year and some of the work that we're doing also with social media now
versus print material.
MR. PETTEN:
Subhead 3.2.02, under
Allowances and Assistance, can you advise what allowances and assistances are
included in this line?
MR. HAWKINS:
Allowances and Assistance?
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
So the question is what's
the differential there?
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah, I guess, that's a
two-part question: What's the differential, why the drop and what is included in
those Allowances and Assistance?
MR. HAWKINS:
So what we have in that is
funding is provided for employment development services. Also, we have the ABE
placement supports and, of course, a lot of that then becomes federal funding. I
think it's probably up to may be 90 per cent federal funding matching for that.
That would be included in the Allowances and Assistance.
MR. PETTEN:
Why was there a drop in the
revised amount?
MR. HAWKINS:
The demand for the services
wasn't there and we feel now, going forward in 2018-2019, to make sure that we
capture any increase in demand, we felt it was prudent for us to include the
same budget for 2018-19 as we had budgeted for 2017-2018 but, as I said, the
intake in the revised in '17-'18 just wasn't there but, again, we don't know
what will happen in 2018-2019.
MR. PETTEN:
Under Grants and Subsidies,
who receives these and what are they for?
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, under the Grants and
Subsidies, you would find that's where our Linkages program would be. You'd also
find Newfoundland and Labrador works. JobsNL would be included in that. You'd
also find the Employment Development Supports would be there and there is some
funding as well that we have with the Poverty Reduction Strategy funding that we
make available and that includes a community collaboration facilitator for the
Western and Central regions, and we also do work with the transition to work
program, which is a program that originally started in Corner Brook and Grand
Falls-Windsor, and now I think this year we might have done Marystown and some
other areas as well. So that's a transition to work program that would be
covered under these Grants and Subsidies.
MR. PETTEN:
Could we get a list of those
recipients of those Grants and Subsidies? Yeah.
So what
was the reason for the drop of $334,000?
MR. HAWKINS:
What was the question?
MR. PETTEN:
Grants and Subsidies, there
was a reduction from last year.
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, I think I mentioned
that it was a lower than anticipated uptake in the funding for the employment
transitions. The requests didn't come in for that. So what I've done now is
budgeted as if we will be back to 2017-2018 budget levels, just to make sure we
are covered, in case there is an increase in the intake.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
You
don't have the numbers of people compared year over year?
MR. HAWKINS:
I think we do, somewhere. I
thought I saw it somewhere.
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MR. PETTEN:
3.2.03, Professional
Services, that's a big increase there.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay. That's a significant
increase. It's an upgrade to the system. We're getting into a performance
measurement strategy as we get into the new Labour Market Development Agreement.
We're trying to bring our system online so we have a proper reporting system.
We have
to be compliant with the federal government in providing information to access
as we move into this new Labour Market Development Agreement. There would
certainly be upgrades that we have to make to our system.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Under
Allowances and Assistance, what's included in this? I noticed that, too, was a
$6.4-million increase as well.
MR. HAWKINS:
In Allowances and Assistance? The significant amount of funding would be,
obviously, in our Skills Development Program – that's where our JCP program
comes in – our Self-Employment Assistance Program and apprenticeship supports.
There's some money there for the work, health and safety commission as well but,
primarily, that's our programming funding for these departments.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Under
the federal revenue line there's an increase over what's budgeted this year over
last year of $7 million.
MR. HAWKINS:
That's the new Labour Market Development Agreement.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
I think when I spoke earlier
I said over the next six years it's roughly about another $80 million that will
be going into Labour Market Development Agreement as well as our Workforce
Development Agreement. This is where you would capture that increase in the
federal funding that's coming in. We're seeing an increase in that funding.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
In
3.2.04, Purchased Services, a substantial increase of $600,000.
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, that's tied to the Workforce Development Agreement. There are two
agreements. There's the Labour Market Development Agreement and there's a new
Workforce Development Agreement.
The
same scenario; the performance measurement support system that is required in
order for us to be able to share information with the federal government will be
captured in there. We will be investing that money into the system in order for
us to be compliant and be able to provide the information that the federal
government needs so that we can actually share with the federal government, they
can share information with us and we can share our information with them, as
well. That's where that cost will be.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Petten and Minister.
Ms.
Michael.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Minister, if we could just come back 3.2.03.
MR. HAWKINS:
3.2.03, okay.
MS. MICHAEL:
I think that's where I want to go. Yes, I think so. You may have answered this,
I'm not sure, but if I missed it, I apologize. Under the Grants and Subsidies,
what are those Grants and Subsidies related to and why the difference?
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
I guess
I'll start, first of all, with what the Grants and Subsidies are for. There's
roughly about $4 million there that's attached to the Labour Market
Partnerships; the Employment Assistance Services, EAS services, would come out
of that; wage subsidies would also be there; our Job Creation program; and
Self-Employment Assistance. There's a fair amount of programming into those
grants and those subsidies.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right. Thank you.
They're
all the EI-eligible programs, right?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you very much.
I meant
to say this earlier on but can we assume that we are going to be able to have
your binder?
MR. HAWKINS:
Oh, absolutely.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes, right. So then there will be a lot of details in the binder that we don't
need to get you to go through.
Going
back to 3.2.02, Mr. Petten did ask for the number of recipients of the Grants
and Subsidies. I'm assuming you would have the individual recipients, as well as
agency lists, et cetera, for those programs.
MR. HAWKINS:
I'm saying yes because we have a fair number of groups that will, obviously,
avail of the Linkages program which is a very important program for us.
MS. MICHAEL:
It is, yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
We would have all that information on what groups and organizations would be
getting these Grants and Subsidies.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you very much.
I'm
just going to make sure there is nothing else under 3.2.03 that I want to ask.
No, I think they're all done.
Under
3.2.04 Mr. Petten asked about the Purchased Services. The Allowances and
Assistance, I can't remember if Barry asked that or not.
MR. PETTEN:
(Inaudible.)
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
The
Allowances and Assistance, again, there's a variance last year between the
budget and the revision, and a variance upward this year between the Estimate
and last year's budget.
MR. HAWKINS:
Ms. Michael, we did some
re-profiling, as well, in that particular section. Again, the allowances for
that transitions to work program, we re-profiled that to Grants and Subsidies.
We made that sort of shift, so that's a re-profiling within the department.
MS. MICHAEL:
With the next line?
MR. HAWKINS:
The Allowances, we'll pick
it up as well within the – Bren, what line did we go to on that one?
MR. HANLON:
Grants and Subsidies.
MR. HAWKINS:
It went to Grants and
Subsidies.
MS. MICHAEL:
So the next line underneath?
MR. HAWKINS:
The next line.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes, okay.
There's
not a complete correlation though, is there?
MR. HAWKINS:
There might not be a
complete total correlation but if that is a difference then we've added
something else there.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
And we have.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yeah, because the revision
last year was $874,700 and this year the estimate is only $5,175,600. I'm
curious about the revised number last year that was quite a revision of
$874,700.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. Again, the additional
funding is provided under the LMTA, the Labour Market Transfer Agreement. There
was $779,000 additional funding that we got there which was attributed to that.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
MR. HAWKINS:
The transition to work
program funding re-profiled from Allowances – there was about $96,000 that was
re-profiled.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
It's the additional funding
provided under the Labour Market Transfer Agreement.
MS. MICHAEL:
Why is it back down to
$5,175,000 this year?
MR. HAWKINS:
The additional Workforce
Development Agreement funding for 2018-2019 – there's $570,000. I'm not sure if
I'm getting at what you're looking for as the rationale.
There's
offset by a decrease of $500,000 related to the fisheries support worker funding
transferred to the Department of Fisheries and Land Resources. We transferred
out to them $500,000. So when a fish plant closes, we – they were actually
funding that.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
So what we did, we decided
we would transfer $500,000 so they would be able to cover that from the
Fisheries and Land Resources.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. That explains that
discrepancy. Thank you.
You've
already explained the federal revenue because it's gone up.
Okay,
thank you.
3.2.05,
it looks like this program is gone. Are all the workers being taken care of
somewhere else?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. What happened in this
program, the target initiative for older workers is phased out and now will be
included under the new workforce development, which will primarily be looking at
persons with disabilities, target initiatives for older workers, job creation
and indigenous people. So that becomes a separate Workforce Development
Agreement, and that's now captured under that agreement with additional funding.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. So it's a separate
agreement under that agreement.
MR. HAWKINS:
Correct. What we now have is
the Labour Market Development Agreement and the Workforce Development Agreement.
So we have two separate agreements.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay, got it.
Thank
you very much.
3.2.06,
this is Employment Assistance Programs for Persons with Disabilities. This
program continues, does it? It looks like it does.
MR. HAWKINS:
If I'm understanding; this will be a cost-shared agreement.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
The funding is provided for
training services, program support, employment, job trainers, PRS initiatives.
That's a shared responsibility from the federal and provincial government. That
is the Employment Assistance Programs for Persons with Disabilities.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. It looks like new
money has been put into this program under the agreement, because under federal
revenue –
MR. HAWKINS:
No.
MS. MICHAEL:
No? It went up by $478,400.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, okay. Let me just look at my notes there.
There
is additional revenue provided under the Workforce Development. There's about
$399,000 that came out of that. So we did put money in there from that
agreement.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
There's about $400,000 into
there.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Then
going back up to the Allowances and Assistance, I guess last year there just
wasn't as big an uptake.
MR. HAWKINS:
Right.
MS. MICHAEL:
And this year you have
increased, though, based on a real expectation, I assume.
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, sometimes it's your
best guess as to what might happen or might not happen when you go through the
budgeting process. In this particular case, we did make provisions for a
training services program and there was less demand than was anticipated.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, it all depends. For
next year we've just gone back – or for this year coming, in 2018-2019, it's
probably a realistic budget that we feel should cover it. We don't want to be
shortchanged by anybody, obviously.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right. Thank you.
I only
have 27 seconds, so.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Ms. Michael.
Mr.
Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want
to go back to 3.2.04 for a quick question. Under Allowances and Assistance, I
want to know how many people availed of this program this year compared to 2016.
This past year, I should say.
MR. HAWKINS:
We don't have that number. We can certainly provide you with the number of
people that took advantage of that. I don't like using the word took advantage –
the number of people who availed of that program. We can get that number.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you.
3.2.07,
what types of allowances and assistance would be included here?
MR. HAWKINS:
These are basically your
Youth and Student Services. These would be your student summer employment jobs.
MR. PETTEN:
Post-secondary and all
summer students?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, this is your summer
student program.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
So last
year this was reduced?
MR. HAWKINS:
Correct.
MR. PETTEN:
Now this year it's back up
again?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. I'll tell you how that
worked out.
In
2018-2019, $240,000 of the $542,000 for the GRI reduction under the Youth and
Student Services budget was applied to the Student Summer Employment Program. So
that would have really calculated to about 150 fewer summer jobs.
What
we've basically done this year is now we've put in what's called a Student
Mentorship Program, which is going to give us an additional 100 jobs. That will
be funded through the federal funding and will be in areas of aquaculture,
agriculture, oil and gas and forestry. There are 50 new mentorship jobs for
students that will be available.
And I'm
not sure – when are the applications going out for that? Some time in April?
OFFICIAL:
This week.
MR. HAWKINS:
This week?
Applications will be going out for those specific industry sector-related summer
jobs this week.
MR. PETTEN:
On the Grants and Subsidies
line, what's the reason for the fluctuations there?
MR. HAWKINS:
Well sometimes, believe it
or not, you put out a budget and there are varying reasons, sometimes the
Student Summer Employment projects do not materialize. Obviously, if they don't
materialize we don't put the funding at it for the employers.
There
was an adjustment last summer. There were savings due to lower than anticipated
uptake in the Student Summer Employment projects.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
4.1.01,
what investments have been made to – under Salaries, there's a fluctuation of
almost $200,000.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay. I think that probably
includes about 13 positions. Again, part of some of the costing there – as you
know, I mentioned in my preamble as well, we have a new office, the Atlantic
Workforce Partnership project, and that is cost shared between all four Atlantic
provinces on a 30-30-30-10 basis. Some of costs you see there is offsetting the
two positions that are going to be under the Atlantic Workforce Partnership. So
there's some cost sharing that's involved there. We have to budget it in.
MR. PETTEN:
Grants and Subsidies, again
there's a lot of fluctuation in those as well. It's a lot – that's $700,000
less?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
We put
in Grants and Subsidies for 2017-2018 developing a website and the savings that
you see is related to lower than anticipated cost for the development of the
website, LMI forum, request for proposals and foreign qualification carry
forward. So there was some money, there was about $150,000 there in '18-'19. So
that's why you'll see a variation in the amount.
For
2018-19, it's roughly down about $705,000, for the foreign qualification
recognition funding is now moved out of the Workforce Development and
Productivity Secretariat and is now moved into the Office of Immigration, so
you'll see that change. So it's out of there and into Office of Immigration.
MR. PETTEN:
Federal revenue, that's
dropped as well, $405,000, but it also went down $150,000 from the last year's
budget to revised.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, again, the $150,000
differential was the lower federal funding revenue due to savings that we found
under the Foreign Qualifications program and the differential now going into
revenue for 2018-2019 again is related to the moving of the funding from this
section or department into the Immigration department.
MR. PETTEN:
4.1.02, the Salaries line,
there's a drop from last year and there's an increase this year.
MR. HAWKINS:
Bren could probably explain
that, but, basically, we did some budget rightsizing in the salary. I think it
was probably about $35,000 that we – there was some salary budget rightsizing in
that.
The
other piece we dealt with was there was salary savings as a result of two new
positions that we're going to be adding to the – and I think they came on in
August. Was it August they came on? So a part of the year and next year then we
will take up the full complement because we feel with the number of applications
coming in, we wanted to try to increase some efficiencies in that area. So we've
added two new positions in the Budget
2017.
Bren, I
don't know if you want to – that's okay.
MR. PETTEN:
Grants and Subsidies, (inaudible) what these are and who received them? There's
a fair increase there too.
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, I can answer the questions for the savings piece there.
That
was due to consolidation of the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador websites
into: a rare find, so there was some
savings in that area. The increased cost for 2018-19 is a transfer of funding
for the foreign qualification Workforce Development Secretariat. There's
$180,000 in that transfer that came out of one that we just did into this one.
There's a forecasted increase in funding for Immigration Action Plan, English as
a Second Language that would be included in that and we also have some small
amount of funding in there for Sharing Our Cultures annual event, and it's a
small amount.
MR. PETTEN:
Provincial revenue line there, what accounts for this amount? Where does this
go?
MR. HAWKINS:
The provincial funding there is a fee structure. There is revenue – every time
you have a provincial nominee, we go through a Provincial Nominee Program,
there's an application process. So there would be a cost that would be incurred
for the filing of those application pieces. So there would be a small revenue
stream – that's where that funding would come from for that.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Petten.
Ms.
Michael?
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Minister, I have a couple of non-line item questions but related to this section
that we've just been dealing with, Immigration and Multiculturalism.
How
many people came in under the various streams in the Provincial Nominee Program
in 2017?
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay, I think I have that.
In
2017, total newcomers to Newfoundland and Labrador were 1,172. That's inclusive
of principal applicants under the Provincial Nominee Program and the Atlantic
Immigration Pilot Program and their family members as well as refugees; 2017 saw
a 25 per cent increase in principal applicants over 2016. So we're now finding
the highest number of applicants ever supported provincially.
Right
now, these numbers are encouraging and, again, we're looking at certainly trying
to strive to reach the targets that we've set by 2022.
If I
can just take a moment or two, the Atlantic Immigration Program which basically
came in March of 2017, there's a bit of education that has to happen and we need
some advocacy on that because, again, all these federally supported regulations
for immigration, we have to engage employers. So in the Atlantic, we have to try
to encourage more of our employers to get involved in the Atlantic pilot
program.
Some of
the other provinces are finding a greater success by using their temporary
foreign workers and for some reason we, in Newfoundland and Labrador, are not
targeting our temporary foreign workers. So that's going to be an exercise for
us this year, going forward, to concentrate on that because under the Atlantic
Immigration Program, we can move the applications through fairly quickly and
more efficiently than under the Provincial Nominee Program, which by the time it
gets from filing the application to the end, it's probably about 16 months,
versus we can probably try to get them through now within four, five and six
months, which cuts a tremendous amount of time and, certainly, it would be
advantageous for us to sort of put a bit of a focus on the Atlantic pilot
program.
MS. MICHAEL:
How many came in under that
program?
MR. HAWKINS:
Under them separately?
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes, I'd like to (inaudible)
MR. HAWKINS:
I don't know if I have my
numbers exactly on that, I'm trying to remember now. The last time we had –
there were somewhere like a 130-plus? I thought it was a 132 at one time under
the Atlantic pilot.
MS. LANGOR:
(Inaudible) 285 came in
under the Atlantic Immigration Pilot.
MR. HAWKINS:
(Inaudible) for the record.
MS. LANGOR:
Sure.
In
2017, there were 285 that actually came in, principal applicants, under the
Atlantic Immigration Pilot and 544 under the Provincial Nominee Program.
MS. MICHAEL:
544, okay.
MS. LANGOR:
So that would just be
(inaudible), in addition to that you would have your family members and refugees
would be included in our total to bring us to 1,172.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Minister, under the Provincial Nominee Program, will your binder have the
breakdown of the number of skilled workers, international graduates and the
express entry? If you do it –
MR. HAWKINS:
No.
MS. MICHAEL:
No.
MR. HAWKINS:
No, my binder won't have
that detail, Ms. Michael, but I'd be more than glad to provide that.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you.
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, because I think what
we're seeing is encouraging and, I
know one of the focuses that we're putting on is looking at our international
graduate students. Hopefully we will eventually get the federal okay on us
putting together our entrepreneur program.
That's
something we're aggressively working toward but I'm optimistic. The numbers
we're seeing are encouraging. We'll continue to do that and we certainly solicit
support from Opposition Members as well as we work to get those numbers. We'll
certainly be able to provide that for you.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you.
Do you
have the numbers of those who became permanent residents in '17-'18?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, we should have that as
well.
MS. LANGOR:
There were 1,172 permanent
residents in 2017.
MS. MICHAEL:
New ones?
MS. LANGOR:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
What
about retention statistics, Minister?
MR. HAWKINS:
We are doing quite well,
actually, with retention. Right now we're running at about 55-56 per cent for
retention. It's encouraging. Our highest family class retention is running at
about 76 per cent.
Newfoundland and Labrador, right now, has the second highest retention rate in
Atlantic Canada; we're second to only Nova Scotia. As I said, in our family
class, Newfoundland and Labrador has the highest retention rate at 76 per cent.
I can
only think that's hopefully going to get better. I think we just, over the
weekend, engaged Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador in partnership to put
together a welcoming community tool kit which hopefully will be able to address
some of the challenges that particularly – not necessarily the applicant because
the applicant usually is the one that's working – family members that are
attached, sometimes they find challenges within communities.
We have
to try to make it easier for these additional family members to integrate within
the communities. We're going to be aggressively working with Municipalities
Newfoundland and Labrador to ensure that we are providing every possible service
that we can to make it easier for them to transition within the community,
become a part of the community and contribute to the community.
MS. MICHAEL:
Will English as a second
language training be a part of that?
MR. HAWKINS:
English as a second language
training is very important for us. We've engaged in partnership with Memorial
and we've made funding available to the Association for New Canadians as well.
We're providing funding to make sure that we are focusing on English as a second
language because, again, that becomes a real challenge.
Yeah,
we are certainly making that funding available for partners.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you.
I'm
going back to line items now; 4.1.03.
MR. HAWKINS:
03?
MS. MICHAEL:
Labour Relations.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
MS. MICHAEL:
I'm going to use my
intelligence with regard to the Salaries line. I don't have a lot of questions
here, actually, but under Supplies it was $6,400 last year budgeted and revised,
and this year down to $3,800. What would that have covered, the Supplies in that
line?
MR. HAWKINS:
That's just basically
supplies running the offices. As we've done with many departments or with many
lines within our department, we've asked for a zero-based budgeting – for you to
give us the accurate to, as much as possible, under the zero-based budgeting.
That would certainly be an exercise there. They decided we can shave a couple
thousand from our Supplies.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right. Thank you very much.
Those
are all the questions I have for that section.
4.1.04,
Standing Fish Price Setting Panel.
MR. HAWKINS:
Right.
MS. MICHAEL:
Again, I'm just curious
about the drop there in Professional Services. Was that just rightsizing also or
zero-based budgeting?
MR. HAWKINS:
Again, that was another
departmental zero-based review. What they did is they based it on the recent
expenditures they had for the panel. They felt they could live within that
reduction in the budget there.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Thank you.
I only
have 30 seconds so I'll pass it back.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Ms. Michael.
Mr.
Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
A quick
question – I don't know if Ms. Michael asked it or not. On 4.1.03, there's some
fluctuation with the Salaries. Not a lot, but can you explain that?
MR. HAWKINS:
I'm sorry, I didn't get
that.
MR. PETTEN:
Salaries.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MR. PETTEN:
On 4.1.03 there's some
fluctuation in Salaries.
MR. HAWKINS:
Basically, that's budgetary
rightsizing based on requirements that we feel for '18-'19. The original budget
was higher than required for the full staff complement so what we've basically
done is made that adjustment.
MR. PETTEN:
You're saying rightsizing.
There was more money there than what's required for the salary budget.
MR. HAWKINS:
We just reduced the amount.
Obviously there was $23,400 from the original budget and that was not required
in '18-'19. So if it wasn't required in '17-'18, it's not going to be required
in '18-'19.
MR. PETTEN:
No staff changes either?
MR. HAWKINS:
No.
MR. PETTEN:
4.1.05.
MR. HAWKINS:
4.1.05.
MR. PETTEN:
A $70,000 reduction in
Salaries.
MR. HAWKINS:
Labour Standards?
MR. PETTEN:
Yes.
MR. HAWKINS:
What was the question?
MR. PETTEN:
Salaries there is down by
$70,000?
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
In that
year, between '17-'18 Budget and Revised, there was a partial year vacancy in a
policy position in the department. You would see the savings there.
MR. PETTEN:
But it's still down this
year so is that position eliminated?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah and what we're
targeting on that is we anticipate attrition of one Labour Standards officer.
It's an attrition piece there.
MR. PETTEN:
Attrition.
One position is included in that?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MR. PETTEN:
4.1.06, the Labour Relations
Board; how many employees are presently with the Labour Relations Board?
MR. HAWKINS:
The Labour Relations Board;
we would have a chairperson, secretary to the chairperson, chief executive
officer, a deputy CEO, two Labour Relations Board officers and a full-time clerk
typist III. That should be how many positions? One, two, three, four, five, six
– we'll say six positions.
MR. PETTEN:
Under Professional Services
what's included?
MR. HAWKINS:
Professional Services; I
guess that would be professional fees that would be paid to board members in
accordance with the Treasury Board policy for agencies, boards and commissions.
Their per diems would be included in that.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Purchased Services has dropped by $20,000 from last year to this year.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. That is money that was
provided for copiers, copying costs, miscellaneous repairs, printing,
advertising and rent. So they've reduced that. I guess the biggest portion, Mr.
Petten, is related to – the board has moved to a government-owned building,
which is part of our efficiency when looking at leasing. That certainly would
see some of the significant reduction in cost.
MR. PETTEN:
Thanks.
5.1.01,
Salaries; they're up from last year and been revised –
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. That would certainly
be the new Atlantic Apprenticeship Harmonization Project, which is 100 per cent
federally funded. When I mentioned that in my preamble, this is where you would
find that, within the Salaries.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
What
about in Transportation and Communications, a fairly substantial increase there
as well.
MR. HAWKINS:
That would be – as I said,
attached to that office the increase is primarily due to federally funding,
staff travel and communications.
I
think, if I remember correctly, it's probably about – in transitioning the
office, there was probably about 12, 13 trips that had to be made to make that
transition. Advisory committee meetings, there was an increase there. So the
real cost of moving that office would be included in that Transportation and
Communications; but, again, I just want to make sure that we fully understand
that this is 100 per cent federally funded.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
Supplies, the increase in supplies.
MR. HAWKINS:
The same; setting up the
office, standard office supplies. That certainly would be – the cost would be
incurred there.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
5.1.02,
the Grants and Subsidies line, there's a decrease of $500,000.
MR. HAWKINS:
Transportation and
Communications?
MR. PETTEN:
No, Grants and Subsidies.
MR. HAWKINS:
Grants and Subsidies?
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. Basically, less
provincial funding required, and that's due to more of the ABE program was
funded under the federal LMDA program for 2017-2018. We were able to leverage
more federal funding and as a result of that we reduced the provincial
contribution. We were able to offset that almost, I think $500,000, close to
that. We're able to offset some of these costs. So it's federal dollars that
enable us to do that.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
The
revenue there; where's that coming from?
MR. HAWKINS:
Revenue on the provincial
piece there?
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah, Revenue - Provincial.
MR. HAWKINS:
That would relate to
registrations of private colleges.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
5.2.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.2.03.
MR. PETTEN:
01.
MR. HAWKINS:
We're going back?
MR. PETTEN:
No.
MR. HAWKINS:
Oh, 5.2 is it?
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
Sorry, I'm just like – I
need a break I think somewhere along the – do we have breaks in this thing here,
Mr. Chair, or are you just slave drive, just put it on through?
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
MR. HAWKINS:
I tell you, the temperature
in the room is about 500 degrees.
MR. PETTEN:
It's warm, yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
Sorry, Mr. Petten, what was
the question?
MR. PETTEN:
I never asked you one yet.
MR. HAWKINS:
Oh, I'm sorry. I was trying
to get out of here.
MR. PETTEN:
I was waiting for you to get
to the section.
MR. HAWKINS:
Is there a hockey game on
tonight or anything?
MR. PETTEN:
Tomorrow night is a big
night.
Under
the Operating Grant, there's a decrease in the operating grant this year over
last. I guess that question there is going to be more like – I know what's
happening there. The reduction in Operating Grants, do you anticipate that that
will result in increasing fees for students? You can be sure the university will
make up the difference somewhere.
MR. HAWKINS:
No, these are basically fees
that we pay for seats at the Atlantic Veterinarian College.
MR. PETTEN:
No, no. No, you're on the
wrong section.
MR. HAWKINS:
Am I?
MR. PETTEN:
I'm over at Memorial
University now, 5.2.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.2.01. Okay.
MR. PETTEN:
Regular Operating Grant was
cut by nearly $8.7 million. My question is, I guess, the university will have to
find the difference, make up the difference. Will this not result in increased
fees to students in coming years?
MR. HAWKINS:
We don't determine where the
fees are going to be; the Board of Regents would make that decision. We
basically have been very, very clear as a government. We've increased the amount
for the tuition freeze. We increased it by $4 million again this year to offset
that.
Again,
our message has been clear; we want to enable a tuition freeze. As I said, I
can't speak on behalf of the Board of Regents, that's decisions they will have
to make. I'm assuming their budget will probably be coming down some time in
May.
As with
all of our agencies, boards and commissions, we've been very clear of that, not
only within our agencies, boards and commissions, but also within every
department within government. We've all had to look for ways in which we can
reduce, and we've been given targets. We've all worked through that and there
are no real surprises. We've done our projections since 2016, and we're trying
to work within the parameters we have.
As I
said before, we provide to Memorial an operating grant; 80 per cent of their
operating grant is provided by the province. We provide more funding in
operating than Nova Scotia, or New Brunswick, and really, almost as much as all
10 universities get in Nova Scotia.
So I
can't answer that question, with what they will do with their budget. That is
certainly an area they will have to look at, but we have been very clear in our
message to them that we have put measures in place to continue to enable a
tuition freeze.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Minister.
Thank
you, Mr. Petten.
Ms.
Michael.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Minister, if we can go back to 5.1.02, Literacy and Institutional Services. I
think you may have answered this for Mr. Petten, but I'm not sure of the source
of the provincial revenue.
What is
the source of that provincial revenue, the $138,300?
MR. HAWKINS:
That's the private colleges. They have to –
MS. MICHAEL:
That's what I thought.
MR. HAWKINS:
– register with government, so that would be their fee.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yeah, I thought that's what it was. I just wanted to confirm that.
Thank
you very much.
Just a
couple of questions. How are things going with the Adult Literacy plan?
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, thank you for the question.
It's
going quite well. As you know, of course, we started the consultations. We have
completed them. I think there's still opportunity to do online submissions,
which we're getting some good response for online submissions. Then we will have
significant discussions as we move forward with an Adult Literacy plan that we
hopefully will have in place to have a report in – our target is 2019.
Of
course, in that literacy plan there's a great opportunity for participation. We
need suggestions, we need ideas and we need to know how we want to move the
Adult Literacy plan forward. We all know there are some challenges, and part of
that – as well, of course, we have an opportunity to talk about the ABE program,
what individuals feel is working or may not be working.
So it's
a wide range of opportunities to have some discussions. We will continue to have
that over the next several months.
MS. MICHAEL:
And when in 2019 would you
hope to have the plan ready?
MR. HAWKINS:
We're looking at the spring
of 2019.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay, thank you.
ABE
students, do you have the numbers – I'm sure you do, but do you have them at
your fingertips, though, the numbers of students enrolled in private versus the
public college?
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay. Of course, there's no
public now.
MS. MICHAEL:
There's none at all now, is
there?
MR. HAWKINS:
They're all in private
colleges.
MS. MICHAEL:
They're all in private?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. All the ABE would be
in private.
And I
don't – the numbers. Do I have that on a piece of paper there somewhere?
Okay.
Ms. Michael, I'll leave it to Candice, she has the numbers readily available
there.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
MS. ENNIS-WILLIAMS:
The total number of students to date for last fiscal was 1,879 students.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. Do you have the
graduates' numbers as well?
MS. ENNIS-WILLIAMS:
I don't.
MS. MICHAEL:
You don't, okay. Well, if
you have them, maybe we could get them, please?
Besides
those who are enrolled, then knowing exactly how many students graduated would
be helpful information.
Thank
you very much.
I have
a few questions with regard to apprenticeship. I don't have any line questions.
I'm just going to have some general questions around apprenticeship.
Where
is the office located? Under 5.1.01, the Apprenticeship and Trades
Certification. Where is the office located?
MR. HAWKINS:
What number is it?
OFFICIAL:
5.1.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.1.01.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yeah. What I'm asking is not
on a line item.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay, all right. Okay.
The new
apprenticeship?
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes, yeah.
MR. HAWKINS:
That's located here in this
building.
MS. MICHAEL:
Oh, in this building.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay, great.
Thank
you.
I just
have a few questions now. I think the others have been answered.
Under
Grants and Subsidies, in 5.1.01, what is included in the Grants and Subsidies
there? Does that include the government hiring apprenticeship program for
example?
MR. HAWKINS:
The Grants and Subsidies are for, like the youth apprenticeship supports,
distance delivery of apprenticeship, government hiring apprenticeship program
for approximately 80 placements provided to health care boards, school boards,
the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corp., Department of Transportation and
Works. So that would be the groups that would be included under that Grants and
Subsidies.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right. Okay.
Thank
you.
Minister, could we have an update on the Apprenticeship Wage Subsidy and the
number of participants in 2017-18?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, we certainly can get that for you. Not a problem.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Statistics, the numbers of apprentices doing journeyperson training,
journeyperson certificates issued, and if we could have a gender breakdown of
both of those?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Also, the number of women served by the Office to Advance Women Apprentices.
MR. HAWKINS:
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay. So we'll get all that information.
MR. HAWKINS:
Absolutely.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you very much.
I think
I have to go back, one more thing or maybe not.
This is
just a question. It relates – it might help you if I give you the exact thing so
you'll see what it's relating to. Relating to section 4.1.05.
MR. HAWKINS:
4.1.05.
MS. MICHAEL:
Labour Standards.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
You mentioned there was a
loss of one position through attrition and it was a labour standard officer.
What would be the role of the person in that position?
4.1.05,
you said there was a loss of one position and you said the title of the position
was labour standard officer.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. Well, that particular officer would be looking at enforcement compliancy
within, whether the minimum wage, minimum
Labour Standards Act, training.
Anything having to do with the labour standards for employers, employees, that
would certainly – I'm assuming that would cover –
MS. MICHAEL:
Would that work be picked up
by somebody who has the same title that that person had?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
It would.
Okay,
thank you.
All
right, now you can go forward again to 5.1.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.1.01.
MS. MICHAEL:
Oh, no, I'm sorry.
Barry,
you were at 5.2.01 weren't you?
MR. PETTEN:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
5.2.02.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.2.02.
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
MS. MICHAEL:
We're almost there,
Minister.
MR. HAWKINS:
What's that? Almost there.
MS. MICHAEL:
Almost there.
MR. HAWKINS:
That's right.
MS. MICHAEL:
This is the Physical Plant
and Equipment for Memorial. I see that the Grants and Subsidies went up
significantly.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
I can guess which
construction that is, but could you tell us –
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. That area, if you look
at the first one: Loans, Advances and Investments –
MS. MICHAEL:
Yes.
MR. HAWKINS:
– that's a good news story.
That actually we are ahead of schedule with the core science facility, so we had
to put the loan forward to them. That's a good news story in that they're ahead
of schedule.
The
Grants and Subsidies; it's the province's contribution to Memorial for their
capital projects, and that excludes any budget provision for the Faculty of
Medicine.
MS. MICHAEL:
Right.
MR. HAWKINS:
So that's giving them
working capital within their capital for their physical plant and equipment.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay, thank you.
Very
quickly, the federal revenue has gone down slightly. How come?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. Well, that would be
again –
MS. MICHAEL:
Well, it went up and then
came down.
MR. HAWKINS:
– with the delays, some of
the delays. The animal research centre, I'm assuming, would be in that one.
OFFICIAL:
It's just really a cash flow.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah. It's a cash flow that
we're just – we're going to catch up eventually, but just trying to make changes
while – I don't want to use the term make the changes on the fly. I don't know
if that's a good thing when you're talking about budget but –
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay, thank you.
I think
my time is up.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Ms. Michael.
Mr.
Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
5.3.01.
MR. HAWKINS:
5.3.01.
MR. PETTEN:
Did you notice the operating
grant was reduced there as well?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MR. PETTEN:
Do you expect any campus
closures as a result of this reduction?
MR. HAWKINS:
I'll make a statement now:
As of right now I have no idea. Certainly, it's not a surprise.
These
are targets that we've set with the College of the North Atlantic. Some of that
offsetting – you're looking at $1.4 million. We're offsetting that $1.4 million
by continuing our tuition freeze for Newfoundland students which is $1.1
million. We don't anticipate any major changes, other than what have been
customary changes or tweaking with regard to program offerings they've done over
the last number of years.
With
any post-secondary institution that is offering programs there always has to be
a review of what the labour market demands are. If, in fact, labour market
demands in certain areas are not there, then that's the college's right to
adjust programming. That has always happened and we don't see anything any
different this year.
MR. PETTEN:
Do you know what the
enrolment numbers were for 2016 compared to 2017?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, we do. I thought I had
that there.
Candice, do we have that write off? Do you have that number right there so that
I don't have to look for it?
MS. ENNIS-WILLIAMS:
(Inaudible.)
I have
the number of graduates for 2016-17. For CNA it was 2,592. For enrolment for
fall 2017 it was 5,482 for CNA.
MR. PETTEN:
Would that be an increase? I
know it's based on graduates and enrolment, but is that an increase from – one
is graduates and one is enrollees, right?
MS. ENNIS-WILLIAMS:
That's correct.
MR. PETTEN:
How do I know if enrolment
is up or down?
MR. HAWKINS:
I can assure you that, as I
mentioned earlier, right across the board we have a challenge. We have a
challenge in our private training institutions, we have a challenge in our
public post-secondary institutions, whether it's College of the North Atlantic
or whether it's Memorial. If we have less students coming out of school, our
enrolments are going to be down. We are seeing enrolment reductions, in the last
two and three years, that are less.
In
order for us to continue to have a competitive education going forward, we need
to look at other areas. That's why I think it's important that we concentrate on
international students and Canadian students. Right now, if you look at Memorial
University – it's an interesting fact – one-third of the student population is
from international students or Canadian students.
If you
look back probably 20 years, I'm sure those numbers would have been
significantly different. That's an area that we have to – as colleges and the
university – continually monitor because we have to ensure that we have
enrolment levels that provide revenue so we can have instructors and what goes
around.
MR. PETTEN:
Under 5.3.02, the federal
revenue line.
MR. HAWKINS:
Which line?
MR. PETTEN:
The federal revenue.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MR. PETTEN:
What is that?
MR. HAWKINS:
That revenue line is under
the Strategic Investment Fund, SIF. We have a number of projects that we're
getting federal funding. This was a fund that was made available with very tight
timelines in getting construction completed. In Newfoundland and Labrador, with
some of the winter conditions that we have, not all of them have reached areas
that we feel they should be.
We have
applied for extensions under the SIF program and I think we've been pretty much
granted all – if not all, just about all. You'll see adjustment in that federal
funding. As more of these projects get closer to completion, then that's an
adjustment of the federal funding that we have here.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
5.4.02.
MR. HAWKINS:
02?
MR. PETTEN:
5.4.02, yeah.
In
Grants and Subsidies there's a decrease of $3.5 million and back up again this
year.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, we had budgeted $5.6
million. Actually, we revised it to $2.1 million. Basically, what happened there
is we used cash on hand.
The
Newfoundland and Labrador Student Financial Services actually have a bank
account. When collections come in from student loans, they go into this account.
In 2017-2018, rather than getting a loan or taking it out of the budget, we were
able to use cash on hand for that. That's where you're seeing the differential.
We're back, in 2018-2019, at the $5.6 million level again.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay, so the $3.5 million
was cash on hand?
MR. HAWKINS:
Correct.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
The
Revenue – Provincial; there's a $250,000 reduction in the revised in 2017.
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, the decrease was based
on a review of the prior year trends. Again, the same scenario; it was cash on
hand that was used to cover some of these operations. It's basically having the
cash at the time versus having to find it in some other area.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
5.5.01,
Purchased Services; the $1.564 million reduction in Revised and it's back up to
$10 million again this year?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah, that was another one
of those areas that it's probably difficult to predict precisely. The
differential between the budget in 2017-18 and revised was
lower-than-anticipated uptake of apprentice block training. The funds were
transferred to the LMDA program to be used for other projects. It's not a matter
of us losing the funding; it's just a matter that there was less of an uptake
for the block training.
MR. PETTEN:
Okay.
That's
almost final. I just have a couple of questions to ask you, if you don't mind.
Would
you provide me with how many 13-weekers are in your department?
MR. HAWKINS:
Say what?
MR. PETTEN:
How many 13-weekers.
MR. HAWKINS:
We'd have to get that. I
have no idea.
MR. PETTEN:
No?
What
about the total number of positions in the department for this year compared to
last?
MR. HAWKINS:
We do have that somewhere.
What do we have here? That one here, Gig, that we have, going back to April
2013. Want me to go back that far?
MS. DOOLING:
I can get the numbers.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
MS. DOOLING:
Mr. Petten, I can answer that for you.
In
2017-18, the department had a total of 651 positions. In '18-'19 there are 609.
So there's a change of 42 positions. I could step through those with you so that
you understand the difference of the 42. Nine positions would be related to our
attrition management plan; 30 positions related to the restructuring, the
management restructuring that was done in the department is part of the '17-'18
budget, and three positions were normal turnover.
MR. CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Petten.
Ms.
Michael.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I just
have one more question, Minister, and it's a general question. It has to do with
the college's review and modernization plan. We were told they would be working
with the province on infrastructure challenges. Can you give us an update on
that, please?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes. Thank you.
Of
course, there are probably a couple of plans. Memorial certainly has gone
through a governance review. The College of the North Atlantic is working
through their modernization plan which they've done a significant amount of
work, and they're also looking at – they started looking at a strategic plan as
well to incorporate within their broader mandate of what services they want to
provide.
I guess
following the Premier's task force on K to 12, there hasn't been a comprehensive
study done, an independent study done of our public post-secondary education for
quite some time, maybe 10, 12 years. We had discussions with Memorial, with the
president. We had discussions with the president of the college, also with the
chair of the Board of Regents and the chair of the college board and felt it
probably would be prudent at this time to do a comprehensive study of our
post-secondary public education system to make sure we have a system in place
that projects into the next decade and the next decade.
There
are a lot of changes that have happened really in the last 10 and 12 years, and
we need to really be able to capture that. Part of capturing that would be
looking at, how can the university and how can our post-secondary – and, of
course, we don't look at the private training institutions because they're
separate, they are private business. At least when we are providing a public
education, we got to find ways in which we can provide these services more
efficiently, more effectively and beneficial to our students and to faculty.
So what
we're going to be doing is we're going to be embarking on a pretty extensive
review. Involved in that extensive review will be the president of the college
and president of the university; key stakeholders, such as students as well.
Because I think it's very, very important that we engage students in that whole
study and putting together a terms of reference.
Once
that terms of reference has been put together, then we will look at putting
together an independent committee, whether that's through the IAC or some other
means. Right now, we are probably leaning towards the IAC to put together an
independent committee that will then work on the terms of reference and looking
at the possibility of then engaging an outside consultant or an independent
consultant to be able to help them work through those terms of reference.
Again,
there's not a lot of flesh put to what we're looking at but we're getting there
on the framework piece. I would suspect that come the fall we probably should
have our terms of reference pretty much set. Then, of course, the work will
begin. We're pretty excited about that and would invite any ideas or any
recommendations that you guys would have as well to help us as we put together.
That certainly would be welcome, because I think it's important that we do this
right. I'm really anxious to get in and get working on that.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Something like the colleges reviewed modernization plan, that would just
continue on –
MR. HAWKINS:
Uh-huh.
MS. MICHAEL:
– their own track?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yeah.
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
Are you
involved in working with them on that?
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes.
MS. MICHAEL:
You are. Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
What's that?
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
MR. HAWKINS:
Yes, we do.
MS. MICHAEL:
What was that?
MR. HAWKINS:
No, she just reminded me. We get regular reports from the college on –
MS. MICHAEL:
Okay.
MR. HAWKINS:
– where they are. They've made some significant improvements in the way they are
trying to modernize the services we're providing.
MS. MICHAEL:
Great. I guess they'll have it ready for 2019.
MR. HAWKINS:
Well, that's the target.
MS. MICHAEL:
Since that's the target. Okay.
Thank
you very much, Mr. Minister, that's all I have.
MR. HAWKINS:
Okay.
Thank
you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
MS. MICHAEL:
And may I thank you and – because it will probably be the last time I'll speak.
Thank you and your staff for being here tonight and working through late hours.
MR. HAWKINS:
Not a problem.
Thank
you.
MS. MICHAEL:
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Ms. Michael.
Mr.
Petten.
MR. PETTEN:
Yeah. I just wanted to close
off, too, thanking the staff and you, Minister, for providing answers and staff
for sitting in and providing the background.
From my
pervious life, I do know what's involved with Estimates. There was a time I used
to sit over there. So I do understand the process and I appreciate your time,
patience and providing us all the answers.
Thank
you very much.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Petten.
Can I
ask the Clerk to recall the first subhead, please?
CLERK:
1.1.01.
CHAIR:
Shall 1.1.01 carry?
All
those in favour?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against?
Carried.
On
motion, subhead 1.1.01 carried.
CLERK:
1.2.01 to 5.5.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
1.2.01 to 5.5.01 inclusive.
Shall those subheads carry?
All
those in favour?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against?
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 1.2.01 through 5.5.01 carried.
CLERK:
Total.
CHAIR:
Shall the total carry?
All
those in favour?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against?
Carried.
On
motion, Department of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour, total heads,
carried.
CHAIR:
Shall I report the Estimates
of the Department of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour carried without
amendment?
All
those in favour?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against?
Carried.
On
motion, Estimates of the Department of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour
carried without amendment.
CHAIR:
I need a mover of the
minutes of our meeting this morning.
MS. P. PARSONS:
So moved.
CHAIR:
So moved by Pam.
All
those in favour?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against?
Carried.
On
motion, minutes adopted as circulated.
CHAIR:
Just a reminder, our next
meeting of the Resources Committee is this coming Thursday, April 26, at 6 p.m.
and we will be reviewing the Estimates of Tourism, Culture, Industry and
Innovation.
With
that, I want to thank you, Minister, and your department as well for a great
evening. We're out early, so go enjoy yourselves.
Thank
you very much to the Committee.
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
CHAIR:
Thank you as well.
I would
entertain a motion to adjourn.
MR. BRAGG:
So moved.
CHAIR:
So moved by Mr. Bragg.
All
those in favour?
Carried.
On
motion, the Committee adjourned.