June 8, 2021
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Chris Tibbs, MHA for Grand Falls-Windsor -
Buchans, substitutes for Pleaman Forsey, MHA for Exploits.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Pam Parsons, MHA for Harbour Grace - Port de
Grave, substitutes for Sherry Gambin-Walsh, MHA for Placentia - St. Mary's.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Sarah Stoodley, MHA for Mount Scio, substitutes
for Lucy Stoyles, MHA for Mount Pearl North.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Scott Reid, MHA for St. George's - Humber,
substitutes for Paul Pike, MHA for Burin - Grand Bank for a portion of the
meeting.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, James Dinn, MHA for St. John's Centre,
substitutes for Jordan Brown, MHA for Labrador West.
The Committee met at 9:05 a.m. in the Assembly Chamber.
CHAIR (Warr):
Order, please!
Good morning. It's 9:05 and we'll call the meeting to order.
Before we get started, I'll introduce myself. My name is Brian Warr, MHA for
Baie Verte - Green Bay, and it's my pleasure to chair your Estimates meeting
this morning.
Before we get into anything I just want to announce the substitutions:
Substituting for the Committee Member for Placentia - St. Mary's is the MHA for
Harbour Grace - Port de Grave, MHA Parsons; substituting for the Member for
Mount Pearl North is the MHA for Mount Scio, MHA Stoodley; substituting for
Burin - Grand Bank is the MHA for St. George's - Humber, MHA Reid; substituting
for the MHA for Exploits is the MHA for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans, MHA
Tibbs; and substituting for the Member for Labrador West is the Member for St.
John's Centre, MHA Dinn.
I'm looking for a mover from the Committee, we need to adopt the previous
minutes.
MHA Parsons.
Seconder?
MHA Reid.
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, minutes adopted as circulated.
CHAIR:
I did check with the Members from the Committee, so we're fine with – we have an
independent Member and we will offer some time for that Member to ask questions
as well. All agreed?
Thank you.
Resume business, we're here this morning to consider the Estimates of the
Department of Immigration, Population Growth and Skills. I'll ask for
introductions for you to introduce yourself to the Committee and then I'll pass
it over for the department to do the same. So if we could start.
Your tally light is on, go right ahead, Sir.
B. RUSSELL:
Brad Russell, Director of Digital Strategy with the Office of the Official
Opposition.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
C. TIBBS:
Chris Tibbs, MHA for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans.
J. DINN:
Jim Dinn, MHA for St. John's Centre.
P. TRIMPER:
Perry Trimper, MHA for Lake Melville.
S. FLEMING:
Scott Fleming, Researcher, Third Party caucus.
S. REID:
Scott Reid, MHA, St. George's - Humber.
C. PARDY:
Craig Pardy, District of Bonavista.
P. PARSONS:
Pam Parsons, MHA for Harbour Grace - Port de Grave.
S. STOODLEY:
Sarah Stoodley, MHA for Mount Scio.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
If I could start with you, Minister.
G. BYRNE:
Sure. Gerry Byrne, Minister of Immigration, Population Growth and Skills, and
MHA for Corner Brook.
W. MAVIN:
Walt Mavin, ADM of Employment and Labour Market Development.
K. NORMAN:
Katie Norman, Assistant Deputy Minister, Immigration and Population Growth.
J. TOMPKINS:
John Tompkins, Director of Communications.
D. DUNPHY:
Debbie Dunphy, Assistant Deputy Minister of Corporate Services and Policy.
P. HEARN:
Patricia Hearn, Deputy Minister.
S. FRENCH:
Steve French, Departmental Comptroller.
J. REYNOLDS:
Jeremy Reynolds, Executive Assistant to the minister.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Just as a reminder, if you have an opportunity to speak and you feel comfortable
lowering your mask, that's fine as well.
Anyway, I will ask the Clerk to call the first subheads, please.
CLERK (Hammond):
1.1.01 to 1.2.03 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 1.1.01 to 1.2.03 inclusive carry?
Minister some opening remarks, please.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and thank you to all Committee Members and
others in support.
I want to begin by expressing our sincere regrets, condolences and empathies on
behalf of this Legislature – I'm confident in saying that – but on behalf of the
people of Newfoundland and Labrador to the Muslim community of Canada and to
Newfoundland and Labrador. Just before my entry into the Chamber, I had an
opportunity to speak with the president of the Muslim Association of
Newfoundland and Labrador and to express that directly to the community at
large.
As we all know, a very serious event recently happened in Hamilton, Ontario,
which must cause us all pause and reflection on the causes of such an event, but
more importantly how to combat. Islamophobia is very alive and well and it must
be eradicated. Speaking with the president of the Muslim Association of
Newfoundland and Labrador, he gave me great confidence that we have a wonderful
partner to direct energies in that effort.
The Muslim community of Newfoundland and Labrador are hurting right now and they
continue to hurt following the mass devastation, the attacks in Quebec and this
now is a follow-up consequence or it's a follow-up action. It is just simply
deemed unacceptable and I'm confident that we'll be speaking further to this on
the floor of this Legislature, but even just as importantly, in our living
rooms, our kitchens, in our mosques, in our synagogues, in our churches and
everywhere Newfoundlanders and Labradorians gather to have conversations about
serious issues. This is, indeed, a serious issue.
With that said, on behalf of each and every one of us, and on my own personal
behalf, I want to extend to the Muslim community of Newfoundland and Labrador
and to Canada at large: We are with you. Our thoughts and our prayers are with
you. We're with the families of the victims of an atrocious attack and we will
act in concert and common cause to combat such attacks.
With that said, Mr. Chair, it echoes well for what we need to talk about in this
Legislature, which are issues around multiculturalism, immigration, resettlement
and welcoming new Canadians. This is what this department is really all about
now, it is more focused than every before. We've had a series of structural
changes, which, I think, are very much appropriate and better to be able to deal
with population growth, to arrest population decline and to advance population
growth in our province, as we know we are a shrinking population due to
demographics.
We are the only province in Canada forecasted to decline in population over the
next series of years, if not decades. So the Premier has directed, from a
machinery point of view and from a policy point of view and from a resource
point of view, to add additional resources and capacity to be able to tackle
that challenge.
This is really what the department has become focused on, in addition to a very
significant, ongoing, substantive portfolio of skills development initiatives
for those who face labour market difficulties and who wish to make a transition
into new careers or to adapt new skills and new opportunities.
With that said, I am here with my Deputy Minister Patricia Hearn. Patricia was
handpicked for this particular job. She comes with impeccable credentials in
federal-provincial relationships. She is a collaborator and she gets stuff done.
So I'm very delighted to have Patricia Hearn serving as our deputy minister in
this new, restructured, refocused department, along with an incredible executive
team, headed by Walt Mavin in Workforce Development and skills, Katie Norman in
Immigration and Population Growth and Debbie Dunphy keeping us all together and
structured and performing to top efficiency in Corporate Services.
With that said, we have a good group of directors and managers that I feel are
some of the best that I have ever had the opportunity to work with in my 26-year
career in government and public service.
With that said, we can begin a discussion, Mr. Chair, on the substance of the
Estimates, but feel free to talk about any issues on policy that you would. I
welcome all.
I will be able to deliver the briefing books. I usually like to distribute them
prior to the discussion but I walked away without them. I was on an important
telephone call and I walked away without them this time but you will get them
immediately after the Estimates.
The only thing I would say, there is one discrepancy within the book itself for
$3,200. It's found in a particular subheading under Executive and Support
Services, 1.2.03, I believe it is. There was an omission of a $3,200 expenditure
which will be – it was just caught too late before the publication of the
Estimates document, but it will obviously appear in the Public Accounts in
October or thereabouts. It was just simply an oversight of one particular
transaction. So, with that said, the book, as we understand it and believe it to
be, is fair, complete and accurate to all other measures.
With that said, Mr. Chair, I'm ready to begin.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Minister.
1.1.01 to 1.2.03.
MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I share the minister's sentiments about the horrible tragedy that came about
yesterday in our country. Of course, we are all about inclusion in Canada and in
Newfoundland and Labrador as well. I'm sure the minister will be proud of my
Member's statement I have coming up this afternoon.
Is it okay if I just run over a couple of questions beforehand, before we get
into the –?
G. BYRNE:
(Inaudible.)
C. TIBBS:
Perfect, thank you very much.
We just discussed your briefing binder, and I appreciate that.
Minister, are you still applying zero-based budgeting?
G. BYRNE:
Zero-based budgeting is still in effect, whether it be attrition targets or
other measures. But we're always looking for good fiscal efficiencies and
reforms.
If there are any specific questions, I'm sure that Madam Dunphy would be able to
answer any specific questions you may have.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Are there any errors in the published Estimates book, besides the one we just
talked about?
G. BYRNE:
None that we are aware of.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Is the attrition plan still being followed? If so, what are the changes for the
last year and this year, and how is it being measured?
G. BYRNE:
The answer to the first part of the question is yes, and I'll ask Madam Dunphy
to respond to the ongoing pursuit of that objective.
D. DUNPHY:
Mr. Tibbs, yes, we continue to review all vacant positions when the recruitment
exercise begins to see if there is an opportunity for attrition. As you're
aware, we just went through a significant restructuring, but I can tell you that
in the fiscal year '20-'21 we did eliminate four long-term vacancies as part of
our attrition plan. There were also a couple of contractual positions that were
eliminated, but those were related to functions that have transferred out of the
department. Going forward, we do continue to look at our positions and have
identified one or two for the coming fiscal year.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
How many people are employed in the department?
D. DUNPHY:
Right now, as of June 8, we have 336 positions and approximately 39 vacancies at
this time.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
How many retirements have occurred in the past year?
D. DUNPHY:
Twenty-four.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
How many vacancies are not filled in the department?
D. DUNPHY:
Thirty-nine.
C. TIBBS:
Thirty-nine, we just said that.
Thank you, Ma'am.
Have any positions been eliminated, and what are they?
D. DUNPHY:
So in the last fiscal year we eliminated eight. There were four contractual, one
related to the public post-secondary review when it was in our department –
education review. There was an executive support position that was a contract
with an outside agency that we're being reimbursed for. That arrangement has now
ended, so that was eliminated. We had one position at the Workers' Compensation
Review Division and a temporary contractual position at the Labour Relations
Board. So, again, they were ones that were now moved out. Then there were four
long-term vacancies. They were an information management technician, a clerk
typist III, a program development specialist and a word processing operator.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
How many layoffs have occurred in the department over the last year?
D. DUNPHY:
None that I'm aware.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent, thank you, Ma'am.
How many new hires took place in the last year?
D. DUNPHY:
That I do not know. I can get that for you.
C. TIBBS:
Sure, I'd appreciate it.
How many contractual and short-term employees are in the department?
D. DUNPHY:
So currently we have one contractual position and we have four short-term
temporary employment employees.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
And how many employees are working from home, versus government office right
now?
D. DUNPHY:
So over the past year we were – Minister, if you'd like me to continue, sorry?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, go ahead. You are a wealth of knowledge.
D. DUNPHY:
Thank you.
So over the past year we were very fortunate that we were able to obtain laptops
for the majority of staff. So when we locked down in February past we were very
fortunate in that we had, I'd say, close to 95 per cent of people working from
home. Since the election in the new fiscal year we've gradually been bringing
back some staff like director level and that sort of thing and staff are
dropping in as needed for various functions.
But for the most part, right now, the majority of our staff are still working
from home.
C. TIBBS:
Great, thank you.
Is the department investigating a permanent-work-from-home plan for some of
these people?
D. DUNPHY:
Right now, there is some discussion with the employer in general with the
release of the Together.Again. plan.
We are working with the folks in Treasury Board Secretariat to determine the
appropriate way to address and we will certainly follow any guidance that they
provide.
C. TIBBS:
It's a moving target, I'm sure.
D. DUNPHY:
Yes.
C. TIBBS:
Did your department receive any funds from the contingency fund? If so, how much
and what was it for?
D. DUNPHY:
The main money – the only money, to my knowledge – that we received from the
contingency fund related to the administration of the Essential Worker Support
Program, and that was federal funding. We received approximately $50,000 from
the contingency fund in order to administer that program. Again, that was
federally funded, so that money came from the federal government.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
Due to the reorganization of the department, there's a substantial restatement.
Can we get a breakdown of that?
D. DUNPHY:
Of what was transferred to the other departments?
C. TIBBS:
Yes.
D. DUNPHY:
Yes, certainly.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you.
Total population numbers are forecasted to decline until 2023 and then set to
increase again in 2024-2025. Could we get a breakdown of the methodology behind
these projections?
G. BYRNE:
I'll refer that to ADM Katie Norman.
K. NORMAN:
That information we can certainly provide to you, but those forecasts are
prepared by the Department of Finance. We'll collect it from them and provide it
to your office.
C. TIBBS:
Appreciate it. Thank you, Ms. Norman.
Just a final question for the pre-questions here, Minister: Total unemployment
is forecasted to decline in 2022 substantially and then steadily increase until
2025. Could you explain that and could we get a breakdown of the methodology
behind those projections as well?
G. BYRNE:
Again, as ADM Norman had indicated, a lot of our projections in terms of labour
force come from Economics and Statistics from within the Department of Finance.
But I'm not sure, Walt or Katie, if you would like to provide the basis on which
the budget documents incorporated that information?
K. NORMAN:
Similarly, to my earlier response, we can certainly get you information from the
Department of Finance. In terms of labour market information just generally,
that's fed in from the various sector departments to inform the overall
Estimates book and then that information is reflected in the Economy document.
That would probably be the best place to look in terms of where some of the
labour market forecasting information is based on.
C. TIBBS:
Sure. Thank you so much.
I guess, Mr. Chair, we can start line-by-line items now.
CHAIR:
Yes. Anything from 1.1.01 to 1.2.03?
C. TIBBS:
1.1.01, Salaries: There's $12,500 budgeted this year more compared to what was
spent last year. What's the explanation for this?
G. BYRNE:
I would believe you'd find that is proportionate increases in Executive Support,
executive salary based on structured formats. Patricia Hearn, if you'd like to
sort of step in on that particular detail.
P. HEARN:
As it's noted in the binder that you will receive, it reflects, I think, what
you would have heard from many other departments: There's an adjustment from
last year. That would have included an extra pay period last year. Then the
negotiated increases that were common to all departments are reflected in that
as well.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
Transportation and Communications, there was $32,600 less spent compared to what
was budgeted. Can you explain this and give us a breakdown of what wasn't spent
due to COVID?
G. BYRNE:
Obviously, with COVID, there were very much lower travel costs due to
restrictions related to COVID. There was a decrease prior to this year's
expenses due to zero-based budgeting as well. There's a pathway for efficiency
there. But that is in relationship to the fact that COVID restricted travel.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
General Administration, 1.2.01, Salaries: Budgeted Salaries are $39,000 more
this year than what was spent last year. Can you explain this, Minister, please?
G. BYRNE:
We're moved over to 1.2?
C. TIBBS:
Yes, Sir, 1.2.01, Salaries.
G. BYRNE:
There were, as indicated, approved salary increases consistent with original
formats with the negotiated benefits packages. Salaries were adjusted
accordingly.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
1.2.01, again, Transportation and Communications: There was $23,400 less spent
compared to what was budgeted. Can you explain this and give us a breakdown of
what wasn't spent due to COVID?
G. BYRNE:
In terms of Executive Support, that would have been a number of – there were
obviously lesser travel demands due to restrictions of COVID. In terms of what
that line item might have dealt with in the past, I could ask Debbie Dunphy to
provide some further details, but generally speaking, I think you'll find that
that's a function of COVID.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
General Administration is continued, 1.2.02 Administrative Support, for
Salaries, which is 01. There is $155,400 more budgeted this year compared to
what was spent last year, can we explain this?
G. BYRNE:
Sorry, we're jumping around in subheads, where are we to?
C. TIBBS:
1.2.02, 01, Salaries.
G. BYRNE:
Yes, okay.
There were savings that were related to vacancies and delayed recruitment
process that caused the 2020-21 revised budget to come down by $39,300 from the
previous year's budget. In addition to that, there were approved salary
increases as per the structured formats and salaries were adjusted across the
department to reflect those actual requirements.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
1.2.02, 01, Purchased Services, there is $34,800 more budgeted compared to what
was spent last year. Can you explain this?
G. BYRNE:
With Purchased Services, this involves everything from banking fees to
reductions in shredding services, copier costs, debt machines, all sort of
different functions. In terms of that being a zero item in this current fiscal
year and revised from last year, those functions were obviously not required.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Could we also get what banks were involved and the banking fee breakdown as
well?
G. BYRNE:
Ms. Dunphy, if you would.
D. DUNPHY:
Yes, certainly. We would be using the bank that is the bank for the province,
for the employer, but we can certainly give you a breakdown. Those fees include
the use of debit and credit machines in our various regional offices as well.
It's just done in the Administrative head.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect. Thank you, Ma'am.
1.2.02, 02, Revenue, there was $107,300 less revenue last year compared to what
was budgeted. Can we explain this?
G. BYRNE:
Debbie, I'll ask you to …
D. DUNPHY:
This related revenue account is generally – I'll call it a catch-all for the
department. If we distribute monies, and organizations or entities are not able
to spend it and they return it based on the contract, if it's a different fiscal
year, it has to go back into a general revenue, and not back into an expenditure
line. We have a standard budget that we use every year although this item does
vary from year to year. Of course, with COVID, during '20-'21 there were lots of
shutdowns and reductions so the revenue amount is still considerably lower. On
the flip side, sometimes that means that organizations are spending their money
and they don't have to refund the province, and that's a good news story. We
monitor that every year to have a look to make sure we're budgeting at the
appropriate level.
C. TIBBS:
Great. Thank you, Ma'am.
1.2.03.01, Salaries, there was $119,000 more budgeted this year compared to what
was spent last year. Can this be explained?
G. BYRNE:
I'll just ask you, Debbie.
D. DUNPHY:
Sure.
When we compare the revised number, that is our projection, which is as close to
actuals as we can get it. Sometimes the variance is low because of vacancies,
but we still budget for the full amount of the positions for the division. We
review our salary plan every year and ensure we have sufficient funding for the
positions that are going to be filled during the year. Of course, as some of the
earlier explanations, the increase often relates to the approved salary
increases that were –
CHAIR:
Thank you.
I remind the Member that his speaking time has expired.
We will turn the table to MHA Dinn.
1.1.01 to 1.2.03 inclusive.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I certainly join the minister and my colleague in the Official Opposition in
condemning the attack on the Muslim family in Ontario and condemn all forms of
hate speech, hate action to our brothers and sisters who share this country with
us.
I have a question with regard to – I heard it the first time I came as an MHA –
zero-based budgeting. I heard the word attrition and now we have – I know it's
in the budget, the whole notion of balanced-budget legislation.
As I understood it, zero-based budgeting was all about making sure that we spent
only what we needed to spend, then we have attrition. I am assuming, then,
attrition is designed – well, we know longer need to spend that so we're not
spending it. I'm just trying to think how this will fit in with balanced-budget
legislation. I would assume we wouldn't need balanced-budget legislation if
indeed we are already doing our best to count our pennies in this situation.
How will the balanced-budget legislation affect this department? How will they
all work together? I guess this may be a little bit of a philosophical
discussion, but I'm very curious as to how these are going to work together,
especially in a department which is about trying to increase the population of
Newfoundland and Labrador.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll handle that from the basis – I think the Member properly pointed out that
this is a small P political question and a policy question entwined into one.
With that said, the policy is based on – and, again, referring to the Member's
own description of the initiative, it's to build up, it's to look at
expenditure, not simply from the lens of what did we do last year but to look at
the expenditure from what do we need to spend to do what we need to achieve.
That's what zero-based budgeting is, which the Member correctly sort of
described, in my opinion, it's to look at things with a different lens, a
different eye and a different view than what otherwise might be just simply to
maintain a status quo momentum or inertia.
The interaction of balanced-budget legislation is also a rather straightforward
philosophy that you should only spend what you take in. Any entity, a family, a
business or a government, that has as its operating principle to spend more than
it takes in, there is a consequence to that. But also to collect more revenue,
the balanced-budget legislation also refers in the inverse to take in more than
you spend to actually tax higher than what is needed to be taxed. Or to collect
revenues higher than what may need to be collected is also a consequence of
balanced-budget legislation, which I think everyone would agree with, that you
should really only collect that which you need and don't overtax.
So that's the dichotomy of the two-way street of what balanced-budget
legislation entails. Zero-based budgeting entails just simply looking with fresh
eyes at what your objectives are and what you need to do to achieve those
objectives. I think those are two fairly fundamental principles of good
governance and efficient management of public resources.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Do you anticipate, then, balanced-budget legislation impacting work that this
department does in terms of, like, projects or initiatives that you would need
to undertake to attract new people to this province?
G. BYRNE:
I think actually it will have a very positive impact on the objectives of the
department. One of the things about attracting people to come to Newfoundland
and Labrador is many, many factors. I would not like to overstate any one
particular factor but many factors are involved in attracting new migrants, new
people to call Newfoundland and Labrador home. One of which – one of which is a
stable fiscal environment for the province. Having stability within the province
provides a great sense of security and stability for the individual or the
family settling here. Having that process, that legislation, that philosophy in
place makes Newfoundland and Labrador a stronger, more attractive place to
attract newcomers to our province.
We are blessed by the fact that we also have significant resources from the
federal government in our employment, development and skills operations to be
able to make sure that Newfoundlanders and Labradorians have access to
resources. That's under contract or commitment from the federal government.
I believe this year, Walt, we have upwards of $230 million to be able to spend
on Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, on Canadians and permanent residents to our
province to be able to obtain the skills that they need to be active in the
labour force and to make labour market adjustments.
To answer your question in short is that it is having such stability within, not
only the individual workplace or the labour market for the ability for
individuals to be able to make gains and make improvements with their own skills
within the labour market is a positive but also to be able to create a more
stable, overall fiscal economic and social environment for the province that is
an attractant for newcomers as well.
J. DINN:
Attrition: How are positions lost to attrition determined? If it's because the
function is no longer being carried out, that's one thing, or is it also that if
we have a retirement, well, we won't be looking to hire back. If that results in
increased workload, that's one thing. If it's actually that work is no longer
being completed, it's another. But the person retires and now the work is shared
amongst others, you've increased the workload on other members in the
department. I'm just wondering how attrition is determined, if we no longer need
a position that we're not filling it.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The process of attrition is not a simple binary on-off switch that when a
position retires, it automatically gets eliminated. There's an evaluation that's
taken. Attrition targets are established, but each and every position is
evaluated for its ongoing and future merit and requirement.
Debbie Dunphy, you might be able to jump in here with further details. But to
suggest that – and I would not want anyone to leave with this notion that
because someone is retiring, the position is automatically eliminated. That is
not the case. There's an evaluation that is taken as to the utility and to the
importance of the job function to determine whether or not it fits within the
attrition envelope.
Debbie?
D. DUNPHY:
The other thing we do consider is – you mentioned workload and the workload
demands and what the demand is on a particular – whether it's programs or areas.
There's always a consideration given to, can the workload be divided up amongst
the remaining employees or is it a matter of, no, the demand in a particular
area is too high and we wouldn't consider it. As the minister indicated, each
position is evaluated based on the circumstances that we have in front of us for
the time, and not just on a retirement.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Would it be possible to have an outline or the criteria of just how that
evaluation takes place? I don't know if there's a matrix that would guide that.
That would be appreciated if you do have that.
G. BYRNE:
I'll ask Debbie Dunphy to look at our records to find out exactly what's in
place, not only within Treasury Board, but within the department itself.
Normally, these are taken on a case-by-case basis, but if there are specific
directives or policies in place, we can certainly forward those to you.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Part of the minister's mandate is to attract skilled workers to immigrate to the
province, but there are already skilled, educated people here who are stuck
delivering food, driving cabs or unloading freight and storage because their
credentials are not recognized. Is there a plan or intention to work with your
federal partners to clear away some of the red tape preventing immigrants from
reaching their full potential in our province?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, there certainly is. We work very collaboratively with the federal
government on issues that are within a federal jurisdiction in terms of
credential recognition and skills, but also within the context of ongoing
bilateral agreements on immigration. The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador
Immigration Agreement is about to be renewed.
One of the things that I think must be brought to bear in mind is that it is
professional organizations and associations, self-governing bodies, that
determine much of the accreditation process and accreditations are recognized –
and this would be acutely so within health professions, engineering professions,
other highly technical professions where skills are in demand. We have already
begun a process, working with professional organizations, self-governing bodies,
bodies that are mandated through statute of this House of Assembly, for
credential recognition. We have engaged in pilot projects in the past and will
continue to do so on credential recognition.
CHAIR:
Thank you. The Member's speaking time has expired.
1.1.01 to 1.2.03, back to you, MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I just have one more question for this subhead.
Last year there was $18,400 less spent compared to what was budgeted. Can this
be explained, Minister, please?
G. BYRNE:
Mr. Tibbs, would you be able –
C. TIBBS:
My apologies. 1.2.03.
G. BYRNE:
Yes.
C. TIBBS:
Under Salaries, 01.
G. BYRNE:
Yes.
C. TIBBS:
Last year there was $18,400 less spent compared to what was budgeted.
Grants and Subsidies, sorry.
G. BYRNE:
Oh, Grants and Subsidies.
C. TIBBS:
My apologies.
G. BYRNE:
Yes. The Grants and Subsidies, this was a discussion last year at Estimates as
well. There are a number of different initiatives that often are deemed by any
reasonable person to be significant, substantial and worthwhile in doing, but
often there is not a readily accessible or available source of funds to be able
to do them.
Often, programs are designed for applications for tens of thousands of dollars,
if not hundreds of thousands of dollars. Very rarely is a program designed to be
able to provide Memorial University of Newfoundland with a small contribution to
be able to get some health care professional students to travel to Nova Scotia
to participate in a conference or a competition. The literacy award, for
example, the premiers' literacy award; other organizations looking for a small
amount of money to be able to do worthwhile initiatives, this is what this pot
is for.
With COVID, of course, those activities became very rare, almost non-existent.
That is why the funding was down. We spend it as it is needed and as warranted.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
That is all I have for that subhead.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Mr. Tibbs.
Anything further, Mr. Dinn, with our first subheads, 1.1.01 to 1.2.03 inclusive?
J. DINN:
Yes.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
J. DINN:
Under 1.2.02, Administrative Support, Employee Benefits were up by over $20,000
in actuals for last year. Were there any unexpected payouts?
G. BYRNE:
I'll ask Debbie Dunphy to reply.
D. DUNPHY:
This is the workers' compensation costs for the department and it was a
retirement payout of a worker from March of 2020 that was actually paid in the
fiscal year 2020-21.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Still with that section, Professional Services: There was money budgeted for
Professional Services, but it wasn't spent. The budget for this year is also
zero dollars. What's the reason for this?
G. BYRNE:
Professional Services, this relates, I believe, to audits. Walt or Debbie, you
may be able to jump in here on this particular item.
There was an invoice for federal audit that was paid through the LMDA budget. It
did not appear in the federal agreement and federal funds. That's the cause of
why it was not able to be (inaudible). There was an increase in federal
transfers through the LMTAs, through the Labour Market Transfer Agreements.
We took a decision wherever possible not to spend provincial money but to spend
federal money where it was appropriate and capable of being done, and this was
the case here.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under Grants and Subsidies, what was the pot of money for Grants and Subsidies
spent on last year in that section?
G. BYRNE:
Is this under 1.2.02?
J. DINN:
1.2.02.
G. BYRNE:
It was annual funding for Stella's Circle.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
You may have just answered this with my colleague from the Official Opposition.
Grants and Subsidies in 1.2.03: Why was actual spending so low?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, that was the question that MHA Tibbs had brought forward and the answer
remains the same, which is that this was funding that was available on a policy
basis to organizations that had activities, objectives within the mandate of the
department, but there was no readily available source of funding to be able to
do these. Often these are relatively small-scale funding requests, but do
provide a strong incremental value to the department and to the client. With
COVID, it was not able to be spent.
J. DINN:
Okay.
Just back to a few general questions just to finish off that.
I applaud, certainly, the department, if there's a provincial dialogue, to work
with the accreditation organizations to get our skilled immigrant workers into
the workforce and to use the skills that they have.
If it comes down to that, there are certain courses or certain requirements met,
is there a program to assist skilled and educated immigrants to complete the
required training or courses to bring their credentials in line with our
expectations, to bring them up to the level that is needed to be accredited?
G. BYRNE:
Under the Labour Market Transfer Agreements, those who have been accepted as
permanent residents within Newfoundland and Labrador are, indeed, eligible for
job-training grants through the Labour Market Development Agreement and through
the Workforce Development Agreement, which is the bulk of our training funds.
The short answer is, within the context of those who are either citizens or
permanent residents the agreement treats everyone equitably and equally.
J. DINN:
That will help them get their accreditation, then?
G. BYRNE:
(Inaudible.)
J. DINN:
Okay, thank you.
Priority Skills NL is supposed to attract educated and skilled individuals to
settle in the province, but the criteria for academic candidates requires them
to have completed a master's or a Ph.D. at Memorial University.
Can the minister explain the rationale for not including applicants with
credentials from other universities from Canada and abroad?
G. BYRNE:
We accept Memorial University of Newfoundland as our primary target for skills
development. We also accept those with substantial work experience in specified
fields of high demand and high need within Newfoundland and Labrador, so it's
not purely academically based. We would like to consider those in bachelor's
programs, in some respects, but the federal government does have restrictions on
how far that particular program can operate, how deep it can dive in terms of
those academic credentials. But it certainly does become a powerful force for
Memorial University of Newfoundland to be able to attract not only students, but
then future immigrants.
I will ask Katie Norman, since I think it's highly relevant, to give sort of a
brief construct of how other universities could fall within this. But more
importantly, uptake to that particular program.
K. NORMAN:
Thank you for your question.
This is really, I think, to the minister's point. Priority Skills Newfoundland
and Labrador is the first attempt of hopefully more to see in the future of
innovation around pathways to immigration in Newfoundland and Labrador. One of
the things that we were noticing was high uptake in our Provincial Nominee
Program and a lot of interest in our Atlantic Immigration Pilot Program, which
we're pleased will be made permanent.
Priority Skills Newfoundland and Labrador is really focused on attracting highly
qualified individuals to key sectors of our economy. We have the ability to
focus on different areas as our labour market needs change, so three key sectors
were an area of focus for the January 2021 application, which included
aquaculture, the technology sector and health care. I'm pleased to say that
upwards of 12,000 individuals have expressed an interest through that process to
being considered for permanent residency in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Unlike other programs, it doesn't require a direct job offer, because that's
kind of one of the areas where we've been looking at. We want to bring,
obviously, individuals in who have a high likelihood of success in the labour
market. Nobody wants to see the kind of situations, MHA Dinn, that you're
referring to in terms of individuals who have skills but are unable to use them
locally. We're trying to align the credentials that people are bringing with the
local needs that we have and we're unable to meet within our domestic labour
force.
We're in the process of, to use a colloquial term, fishing individuals out of
the pool. We anticipate doing the first draw on the health care sector in the
next number of weeks. There will be more to come on that. We are directly
working with the employer community around identifying who has the best match of
skills.
This is, as I said, an innovative pathway, getting employers involved, trying to
increase the number of highly qualified individuals who choose Newfoundland and
Labrador as their home.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
I'll just finish off on this with regard to education. I taught at Holy Heart.
There is a significant number of students whose families are immigrants, and
then there are those who are refugees who come. They're in the ESL program and
they're in the LEARN program, so bringing their own education skills up. In many
cases, many of them have not been in school until they actually arrive here in
Canada.
A couple of weeks ago I sat down with a group of them virtually, because I know
the teacher; I taught there. I wanted to hear what they had to say about
immigration, especially where it was in the Budget Speech and in the Moya Greene
report about increasing immigration. They liked it here. They love it here. They
said the key thing for them is school. That was the key thing for them, the
school system.
Every one of them planned to go on to post-secondary education. A lot of them
planned to go to MUN. That's where they planned. The parents were very much
focused on education. Now, some of them have just arrived here, in relative
terms, but the one thing that sent shockwaves – and I can guarantee you – is the
whole tuition increase. It has them in a bit of a panic. You look at Memorial.
It is a crown jewel – and I would say CNA, too – in attracting people, that
education and affordability. If there is anything, it's going to have to be
affordable to the people if you want to attract people here. The weather doesn't
always recommend itself.
I'll leave it at that. That has to be something to encourage people to stay
here. It has to be about keeping tuition affordable for people. A lot of these
people have not had a chance to build up a huge nest egg to help put their
children through the post-secondary education. Anyway, I'll leave it at that.
Thank you very much.
CHAIR:
The Chair is recognizing the minister.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Memorial University of Newfoundland is a valued, important and successful
partner in attracting new Newfoundlanders and Labradorians through its academic
programs, but upon graduation, encouraging them to stay. We're actively engaged
and working with Memorial University of Newfoundland. We're hand in glove in our
immigration efforts to get new graduates to attend. This is one of the reasons
why the new Priority Skills pathway was developed. It was very specifically for
that purpose.
We consulted with not only Memorial, but more importantly – or equally
importantly – with the graduates of Memorial University who hail from other
countries, from other places, and the notion of the immediate job offer to be
able to attain permanent residencies to go through the pathways was a barrier,
so we amended that barrier.
When it comes to tuition offsets, I think that it's fair to say that within the
Budget Speech, the intention of the government is that, definitely, we'll
continue to offer supports on a needs basis to students. I often reflect on this
one: Post-secondary education was within the portfolio that I held. The
Government of Ontario often advertises that they have free tuition. The reason
why they advertise that is because when you take the federal grants and the
provincial grants for post-secondary students, often the total accumulative
value of those grants equal the cost of an undergraduate education for a
domestic student in Ontario.
If you were to take that same figure or that same formula and apply it to
Newfoundland and Labrador – and I say this with my tongue firmly planted in my
cheek. I would not want anyone to take these words and convey them or construe
them out of context. But if we were to take that same logic or that same
philosophy in Newfoundland and Labrador, you could say, with my tongue firmly
planted in my cheek, that we pay students. Whereas it is free tuition in
Ontario, we pay students to go to university in Newfoundland and Labrador.
I say that just to deliberately bring attention to we have a very generous
grants and subsidies program for tuition offsets and for attendance to
post-secondary education in Newfoundland and Labrador. The government has said
that it fully intends to make first consideration for those who may be impacted
by any decision by Memorial University of Newfoundland to increase tuition
rates.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Chair recognizes MHA Trimper.
P. TRIMPER:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
First of all, thank you to the Committee for an opportunity to interact with
this very important department.
Minister, I guess I will start by saying shukran to you for reaching out to the
Muslim Association of Newfoundland and Labrador. I think that it is a very
important to talk to the leadership of that organization in good times and in
bad. This is certainly a very bad time, so thank you for doing that.
I look at this department as key to the future of this province, frankly. We
just are not having enough children and we really need to figure out how we can
fully embrace and retain the good people that are now becoming such an important
part of our economy.
Sitting in Lake Melville, where I am – and my colleague who normally sits behind
me in the House from Labrador West – our economies survive based on new
Canadians, particularly the Filipino community, but also other nations. We
couldn't do it without them right now. I am paying close attention to all the
programs.
Minister, just thinking about some of the situations, you and I are often on the
same routine coming back to St. John's. If I'm not getting a ride from you, Sir,
I am probably jumping in a taxi that is driven by an engineer or a teacher from
Libya or maybe Russia and so on. I am preoccupied with this frustration around
accreditation by professional organizations. We have to find a better way, a
more streamlined way.
I'm fortunate to speak a few languages and interact with some of these folks
and, wow, I can tell we have something of calibre there. Not that driving a taxi
is not a very honourable and successful way, but they have trained and were
pursuing another career and hoping that Canada could provide them an
opportunity. Unfortunately, we have them relegated to something else that they
don't want to do.
I know my colleagues have brought this topic up already. I don't know if you
have a comment, first of all, on that.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
This is an important initiative. One of the reasons why Priority Skills pathways
is so important is because the credential itself – the Memorial University of
Newfoundland's master's or doctorate program provides the
made-in-Newfoundland-and-Labrador credential for those individuals. But we have
to understand that professional organizations, unless we are to step over them
and their delegated authorities when it comes to accreditation of their own
professional bodies, we have to work proactively and positively with them. We
are doing that and are committed to continuing to do that.
They hold a high standard which we all accept and praise because we all want to
be serviced by professionals, whether it be in the technical fields, in
particular in the health care fields, by individuals who have high skills and
are trusted to be able to provide those important services for us that can have
a direct impact on us.
It's also really important that energy be spent on examining what those
credentials are from foreign jurisdictions to be able to integrate that. Often,
organizations don't have the resources to be able to do that kind of a deep
dive, so that's why the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador is readily
available, and has done so in the past, to work co-operatively with them to
provide them with resources so that they can initiate that work. We'll continue
to do so in the future.
P. TRIMPER:
I think there are two aspects that I'm wondering if we could spend some more
energy on. Perhaps you are already. That's why I look forward to always
participating in these sessions, to learn more.
One is in the area of – so many of these folks, when they arrive here, they're
looking good on paper, and we have this challenge of meeting these
accreditations. I'm wondering if there could be more of a job shadowing or a
mentoring opportunity for some of the folks, especially those in the medical
profession that could be side by side. If we could invest a little bit of
financial support to help those people along. That's sort of one element of it.
The other part I see is the emotional one and the family ties. So often, either
through the Provincial Nominee Program or others – almost hurdles for them to
get their family members over. I'm just thinking that there could be so more
support in that area.
I've become friends with many people in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, for example,
from the Philippines and that's often the big ask for help when they come to
see, is how can I get my parents here and loved ones and so on. Two thoughts.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The idea of job shadowing and of different innovative ways to prove credentials,
to get accreditation is really something that we are doing. For example, we
issued a broad-based request for proposals to organizations, to professional
associations and others to offer to us options and requests for funding to be
able to do that. It's initiated and performed by the associations themselves.
They know best what it is, how their profession works and how to be able to
implement such a program such as that.
The approach that we've taken is to issue a request for proposals, to initiate
pilot projects in this regard, to be able to flush out best practices for those
associations, for those accreditation bodies. Also, the Workforce Innovation
Centre – which is a provincial body that allows for innovative projects,
research projects – on a quarterly basis, I believe, they issue requests for
proposals for innovative ideas to be able to work on labour force, labour market
challenges. This would be a perfect example of that. The Workforce Innovation
Centre has done work in this regard. We have resources in place.
You, as a Member of the House of Assembly, through your own interactions as an
engineer, as someone with technical competence and experience in the
environmental sciences, reaching out to encourage that kind of work would be
enormously helpful as well.
P. TRIMPER:
Okay. Thank you, Minister.
I think my final comment on this – and I enjoy doing it very much. I've been
lucky to work for the UN and Foreign Affairs and CIDA in my career overseas in
the Soviet Union and so on. I got to see how, when we would go abroad to provide
technical assistance and so on, often the people that we were there supporting
within six months were now instructing us. I feel that there's a bit of almost a
psychological barrier there holding us back somewhat. I think it's when you go
through experiences like that that you start to realize if it wasn't for that
language or that culture, we could really recognize the talents. So whatever you
can do to integrate that as quickly as possible, you have a fan here.
I thank you very much and I look forward to more discussion. Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Is the Committee ready for the question?
Shall 1.1.01 to 1.2.03 inclusive carry?
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, subheads 1.1.01 through 1.2.03 carried.
CHAIR:
Can I have the Clerk call the next set of subheads, please?
CLERK:
2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive carry?
MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
CHAIR:
Again, I call 2.1.01 to 2.1.07.
C. TIBBS:
Yes, thank you.
2.1.01, Employment and Training Programs, Salaries: There's $898,400 more
budgeted this year compared to what was spent last year. Can this be explained?
G. BYRNE:
Yes. The budget difference is revised down – there was $908,000 roughly – from
the original 2020-21 budget. Salary costs in this area were taken within the
Workforce Development Agreement to maximize federal funding last year.
You may recall there was a decision by the federal government, as a COVID
response, to increase for all provinces the labour market transfer agreements,
the Workforce Development Agreement, specifically, the WDA, as a COVID response.
At the same time there were challenges related to COVID, so while the federal
government decided for all provinces to increase the WDA, there were some
challenges because of COVID in spending WDA funds. So while we took every
opportunity where we could within the mandate of the agreement or within the
authorities of the agreement to replace provincial-sourced funds with
federal-sourced funds.
Now, with that said, I'll just add this as an additional note, that we were not
the only ones in that situation. As a result, the federal government did allow
for an overrun – what's the word I'm looking for, Walt?
W. MAVIN:
(Inaudible.)
G. BYRNE:
Carry forward. All provinces were able to carry forward additional funds from
their labour market development agreements, labour market transfer agreements
this year from last year over and above what would be the normal formula,
because all provinces face the same circumstances.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect. Thank you, Minister.
Sticking with 2.1.01, Transportation and Communications: There was $9,400 less
spent compared to what was budgeted. Can you explain this and give us a
breakdown of what didn't get spent due to COVID?
G. BYRNE:
Yeah, Walt, I believe you might be the right source for this.
It was COVID-related. What, normally, would Transportation and Communications in
that subhead be used for?
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
It was, as the minister noted and similar to other categories, as a result of
COVID. There was less travel related to FPT meetings, in particular. Also in
there are some costs related to telecommunications, of course, which essentially
stayed the same.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Sir.
Same heading, Purchased Services: There is $13,100 more budgeted compared to
what was spent last year. How can this be explained, Minister?
G. BYRNE:
Under Purchased Services, that same subhead?
C. TIBBS:
Yes, Minister.
G. BYRNE:
Funding is provided – there are different software packages and so on that fall
under this particular category. We had savings related to – we were able to buy
some of the software packages or the licensing, again, through the LMDA, so it's
sourced from federal funds.
These are very important software packages that are used by CSOs, community
service officers, throughout the province, but we were able to source those
funds through federal sources.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
We'll move on to 2.1.02, Employment Development Programs, Allowances and
Assistance: Can you give us a breakdown, please, on how many clients were funded
in each program?
G. BYRNE:
Walt, take it away, if you don't mind.
W. MAVIN:
Excuse me, just to make sure I'm on the right section: Which section again,
please?
C. TIBBS:
Allowances and Assistance, 2.1.02.
W. MAVIN:
2.1.02.
C. TIBBS:
Yes, Sir, Allowances and Assistance.
W. MAVIN:
In this particular category, this would be individuals that we are providing
employment development supports to, and that would include short-term assistance
in the range of – they may need a specific type of clothing to attend work and
so any of those types of things we would provide.
In 2020-21, there were 403 individuals that we provided that level of support.
As well, under that particular category of Allowances and Assistance, we still
have a tutoring, ABE placement support for non-EI eligible individuals, for our
adult basic education students.
I'm just going through my list. I apologize because I have quite a number of
numbers here –
C. TIBBS:
I can only imagine.
W. MAVIN:
– on programs. Adult basic education, skills development, there were
approximately 370 individuals supported.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Sir.
Under the same heading, 2.1.02, Grants and Subsidies: There was $42,223,400 more
spent last year compared to what was budgeted. Can this be explained?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair.
This relates to the federal funding provided for the Essential Worker Support
Program, the top-up program.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Can we get a list of each organization that received funding and how much?
G. BYRNE:
I believe one will be provided in the binder that will follow.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
We'll move on to Employment and Skills Development – or, sorry, continued –
2.1.03, Labour Market Development Agreement, Professional Services. I'll direct
you to Professional Services. There was $430,800 less spent compared to what was
budgeted. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
I'm just going to send you right over to Walt on that.
C. TIBBS:
Your left-hand man.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
Yes, last year, the department along with all jurisdictions across the country
are looking to implement a new system called Targeting Referral and Feedback.
Essentially, what that means is that the federal government, working in concert
with jurisdictions, is providing information related to EI claimants as they
begin claims. The whole goal of the initiative is to engage early in claimants'
activity to encourage return to work.
Last year we had money allocated to develop a system to help facilitate that
process. The Government of Nova Scotia was embarking on a similar system at the
time, so it was viewed that we would work in concert with them. They're doing
some of the development work and so we would defer our investment into the
system development for that year and move it into next year.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect. Thank you, Sir.
Purchased Services, 2.1.03, same heading: There was $31,400 more spent compared
to what was budgeted last year. Can this be explained, please? Under Purchased
Services.
G. BYRNE:
Yes, I believe Mr. Mavin had indicated earlier that we outfitted staff with
laptop computers to be able to work remotely, and this is one of the major
expenses under this particular line item.
C. TIBBS:
All right. Thank you, Minister.
2.1.03, same heading, Property, Furnishings and Equipment: There was $316,100
more spent compared to what was budgeted last year. Can this be explained,
please?
G. BYRNE:
Sorry, I will reverse myself. This is the line for the laptops.
C. TIBBS:
Okay.
G. BYRNE:
The previous line – my apologies on this; I misspoke. The Purchased Services
were for liability insurance for participants in the LMDA project services and
the increase was due to higher than projected costs for Career Cruising and
accountability results management system and software packages. Sorry about
that.
C. TIBBS:
Great. Thank you, Minister.
2.1.03, sticking with it, Allowances and Assistance, I have quite a few
questions here. I'll just concur with them.
There was $21,872,600 less spent compared to what was budgeted last year. Can
this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, as we often refer amongst ourselves as sponsorship; this is school
sponsorship. The number of individuals who came forward looking for assistance
to attend post-secondary institutions, especially at our private colleges and
the College of the North Atlantic, were down during COVID.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Same heading: There is $2,420,000 more budgeted this year compared to what was
budgeted last year. Can this be explained?
G. BYRNE:
Walt, if you want to …
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
Yes, I guess, this relates to the point the minister made earlier in terms of
the provision that was offered by the federal government in terms of a carry
forward into this fiscal year from the previous. This is the first time in the
history of the Labour Market Development Agreement that we've had a
carry-forward provision; prior to that, there was zero carry-forward provision.
This essentially accounts for the additional funding that we have available this
year and our projected activity under this particular program line and that we
anticipate having more students in seats this year.
G. BYRNE:
Excellent. Thank you, Walt.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive.
I'll turn in over to MHA Dinn.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Under 2.1.01, the purpose of activities carried out under this heading, if I
understand it correctly, is to help meet the labour market demand. What skills
are in highest demand right now in the provincial economy?
G. BYRNE:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, for the question.
The labour market itself is best determined by participants within the labour
market. If you look at the performance within the trades and activities within
the trades and which trades really are taking up some of the highest interest,
if you examine, for instance, the trades within the apprenticeship program, we
still have a number of apprentices within the construction electrician trade.
Carpenter, automotive service technician, industrial mechanic millwright,
welder, heavy duty equipment technicians, steam fitter, pipefitter, industrial
electrician and plumber and power line technician, this represents the top 10
trades by the member of registered apprentices in Newfoundland and Labrador. The
top 10 apprenticeships, which I just scheduled off, they account for up to just
about 75 per cent of all registered apprentices in the province.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Before I go any further, I'm assuming we can have that information as well, and
any questions that my colleague asks, the answers, they would be provided to us
as well.
G. BYRNE:
Oh, definitely.
J. DINN:
Okay, thank you.
Is it possible to provide us with some idea of the gap between the number of
people who currently have these high-demand skills and how many we need?
G. BYRNE:
Labour market assessment and forecasting is performed by the Economic and
Statistics Branch of the Department of Finance. We work co-operatively with that
particular branch to be able to forecast. One of the things about forecasting, I
think it's fair to say, is those forecasts can pivot very quickly. We can
forecast based on major project developments, when those major projects proceed.
We can anticipate that the skills required for oil and gas projects will be very
different than a transmission and electricity transmission project or an
electricity generation project.
What we find is that it's really forecasting to be able to create great value,
best value for the client, for the person to examine skilled labour force
options. It's really done on a short-term cycle, but we can forecast, based on
major project schedules, what long-term forecasts would be. It would be unfair
to me to say that it is an exact science.
J. DINN:
Okay.
With that in mind, then, you don't have a particular number of the gap of how
many more we need because of that?
G. BYRNE:
We work hard to always reassess and re-evaluate those circumstances to be able
to pivot quickly, to be able to provide more accurate information as it becomes
available. In the long term, it is a difficult forecast.
I'll just put it in context. In 2015, there were 1,700 construction electrician
apprentices in place in Newfoundland and Labrador. Today there are about 900.
The labour market adjusts within itself and we provide that information, to the
best of our ability, based on the nature of projects. With Muskrat Falls kind of
moving into generation and transmission, as opposed to construction, obviously,
that directly impacts on that particular trade.
J. DINN:
Yes. I'll probably come back to that. That's an interesting point.
How many people, then, go through the programs offered under this subheading in
an average year? And how many last year? Did the pandemic affect program
availability or uptake?
G. BYRNE:
The answer to the latter is that the pandemic did decrease uptake in training
programs. The decision by individuals to seek new skills to train outside of
their existing professions or to upgrade, the pandemic produced negative or
downward pressure on that.
Mr. Mavin, if you wouldn't mind just giving us a highlight of the numbers.
W. MAVIN:
Yes, thank you, Minister.
If I were to pick one, I guess probably the most significant subheading and
program area would be our Skills Development Program, which is our financial
assistance program for individuals participating in post-secondary training.
This does not include block training for apprentices. This would include all
programs that are offered through public-private training institutions across
the province. Again, it does not include the block training.
Last year we saw a decrease of about 25 per cent in terms of the number of
participants in our Skills Development Program from one year over the other.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
On average, how many people would go through the programs offered in this
heading, roughly?
W. MAVIN:
Specific to the 25 per cent I just referenced, in the fiscal year ending March
31, 2020, approximately 4,000 individuals would've participated in
post-secondary training. This last fiscal year it was a little over 3,000.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
How do these programs measure success? Minister, this is to your point of trying
to figure out the labour market demands. Do you keep statistics on success rate
of the programs? If so, is it possible to provide us with an overview of these
statistics?
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
There are post program surveys that are conducted. The survey of: Did an
individual who participated in a post-secondary training program find employment
within that specific scope of their training program? We do follow-up surveys
with training institutions.
I will say, with the volume of participants and the fact that there is no
mechanism to record their every movement post-graduation, it is somewhat
difficult to do extended survey work with individuals who participate in
training programs in a down-stream fashion, for example for several years post
completion of the training. It's difficult to keep track of them, to do that
survey work, but we do our best to maintain relevancy of the training
institution to be able to work with their former students on post completion
success within the workforce.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Would it be possible to have any stats that you do have or charts or otherwise,
like the number of how many of those you have been able to follow and keep track
of?
G. BYRNE:
Whatever is available to us will be provided to you. Mr. Mavin, you might be
able to elaborate a little bit on what is available so that the expectation is
understood.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
If I go back to any of the programming that sponsors through the LMDA, we work
very closely with the federal government and all jurisdictions across the
country in terms of an accountability framework. Part of that is, as the
minister noted, post attendance follow-up surveying, but, as well,
administrative data that the federal government would have access to. So they
would be tracking EI claimants, as an example, who participated in an active
intervention such as a skills development program to track whether or not they
are employed two or three years out from graduation of their particular
post-secondary programming.
As the minister noted, whatever information we have available in that regard,
we'd be able to share it with you.
J. DINN:
Perfect.
Just on the question then with regard to the Moya Greene report, she mentions in
it about that government programs need to be evaluated to see if they are still
meeting their requirements or if they're still achieving their objectives. There
was a very clear need for accountability, transparency and evaluation. I'm
thinking what it would require especially if you're going to be evaluating a
program, I mean, it comes down to how many people are working, how many are not
working in that area and so on and so forth. I'm just wondering to put a more
robust evaluation process in place, what would that mean?
G. BYRNE:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The Premier's Economic Recovery Team, the PERT report that followed the
deliberations of the team are obviously very valuable. It highlighted something
that the PERT team – highlighted something which I think is of value and of
interest to Members of this Assembly. We take those recommendations seriously
and we're considering now as to how we can improve those methodologies to meet
that expectation.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive.
Back to you MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Minister, can you give us a breakdown of how the funding in this line item is
spent? Sorry, 2.1.03, Labour Market Development Agreement, Allowances and
Assistance, can we get a breakdown of how the funding in this line item is
spent?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, you certainly can. Again, this is, as we referred to, student sponsorships.
Walt, if you wouldn't mind taking it away as to what level of data we can
provide.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
As the minister noted, it includes people that are in sponsorship for
post-secondary training. It would also include individuals participating in a
job-creation program – an allowance. It would also include individuals receiving
self-employment assistance.
We can provide you with the funding that was allocated per each of those program
areas. I will note that we are in the middle of completing our annual audit,
which we're required to provide to the federal government and those expenditures
line by line would be made available.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
Same heading, can you give us a breakdown of job creation partnerships, which we
just talked about, for the last year including dollar amounts, group names,
provincial electoral districts and how many were employed?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, we definitely can. It will be provided to you.
C. TIBBS:
Great. Thank you very much, gentlemen.
Can you give us a breakdown of Self-Employment Assistance recipients, including
dollar amounts and business names? Basically the same.
G. BYRNE:
Within the context of privacy, I think I'll pass that over to Mr. Mavin to –
there's full transparency of it, but we'll –
C. TIBBS:
Of course, I'm not looking to breach any privacy, whatsoever. I want to make
quite clear.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
Yes, to the minister's point, due to privacy, I don't think we're going to be
able to provide you with the list of individuals, which is essentially a good
portion of the funding under that category line.
C. TIBBS:
Okay.
W. MAVIN:
But the type of information that we can provide are things such as the types of
business, as an example –
C. TIBBS:
That would be great.
W. MAVIN:
– that are fund through the Self-Employment Assistance program.
C. TIBBS:
We appreciate that, thank you.
Can you give us a breakdown of the ABE college payments by installations?
G. BYRNE:
We will provide that.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
We'll move on to Grants and Subsidies, please. There was $31,135,300 less spent
compared to what was budgeted last year, can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Go ahead there, Walt.
W. MAVIN:
Thanks, Minister.
That would be a portion of the Job Creation Partnerships program. The funding
for the Job Creation Partnerships program is broken down in two categories.
There are the allowances that I referenced earlier that go direct to the
participants, but there's also funding that goes to the sponsor organization, to
the community development organizations, and such, across the province who are
sponsors to the program.
In '20-'21, obviously, as in other program areas, we did see a decline in the
number of projects that were undertaken for JCP. Wages subsidies is another
program area that comes from Grants and Subsidies, and are subsidies that go
direct to employers with the intent of creating employment. Again, we did see a
drop in that program area. Those are just two examples and we can provide you
with a fuller listing.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
Sticking with Grants and Subsidies: There is $32,535,500 more budgeted this year
compared to what was budgeted last year, can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Again, that was a fortuitous circumstance created by the ability – the federal
government's authority that they granted to all provinces to be able to carry
over uncommitted funds from the previous year.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Can you give us a breakdown of how funding in this line item was spent?
G. BYRNE:
Again, Walter.
W. MAVIN:
Yes, we can give you a full listing of –
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
Can you give us a list of employers that receive funding through the JobsNL wage
subsidies, how many jobs were created by each employer and how much funding they
received?
G. BYRNE:
I believe we can. On its surface, it's not subject to privacy limitations
because, of course, it's a business entity receiving government resources and
that must be made transparent. I believe that's the case, isn't it, Walt or
Debbie?
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
C. TIBBS:
Much appreciated, thank you.
Can you give us a breakdown of the Labour Market Partnerships?
G. BYRNE:
We can do that as well.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Sir.
Can you give us a breakdown of the Job Creation Partnerships for the last year,
including dollar amounts, group names, their provincial electoral district and
how many were employed? Different than the Allowances and Assistance section.
G. BYRNE:
I don't know if that data is aggregated at the electoral district level, but as
–
C. TIBBS:
(Inaudible) cross compare.
G. BYRNE:
– it's aggregated, we can certainly provide that to you.
C. TIBBS:
Okay, perfect. Thank you so much.
Can you give us a breakdown of how research and innovation monies were spent
over the past year?
G. BYRNE:
Yes. Actually, this is an interesting thing because I remember this.
There are various categories, envelopes or opportunities within the Labour
Market Development Agreement to be able to provide funding for various
initiatives. Up until 2017, I believe, we, as a government, had not spent any
money on research and development within the LMDA and we opened up with a volley
through the creation of the Workforce Innovation Centre. That has proven a huge
advantage to us. A lot of great projects have been done through the Workforce
Innovation Centre.
The majority of our spending on research and development projects is a direct
transfer through the WIC, then they solicit proposals through a
request-for-proposal process to get ideas for innovative projects and then they
indicate to us how they'd like the money to disburse. No, actually, I think we
disburse it directly to the WIC and then they disburse it to the client.
So we can also provide you with a full list of projects. That's the Workforce
Innovation Centre, the WIC, what projects they've undertaken so far.
C. TIBBS:
Good stuff. Thank you, Minister.
Moving on to 2.1.04, Workforce Development Agreement, under Salaries: There was
$499,800 more spent compared to what was budgeted last year. Can this be
explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
I'm going to get Debbie. I believe, Debbie, it would be your shop.
D. DUNPHY:
If you recall, back at 2.1.01, we had a significant decrease in the salary cost.
Well, the increase is reflected here because it was charged to the federal
agreement under the WDA.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much.
We'll move on to Allowances and Assistance: There was $177,100 less spent
compared to what was budgeted last year. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
That's a lower than anticipated demand in this area, the majority of it being
apprenticeship class calls that were unable to be held. So as an apprentice goes
through their block they get the prerequisite number of hours – you know this
better than anybody. We didn't have class calls during the pandemic.
C. TIBBS:
Makes sense. Thank you very much.
Grants and Subsidies, under this heading: There was $5,026,200 more spent last
year compared to what was budgeted. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
The federal government approved the additional funding under the agreement.
Walt, if you might be able to pick up the cause from there.
W. MAVIN:
Yeah, thanks, Minister.
Back in the fall of 2020, the federal government, as part of the COVID response,
provided approximately $90 million of additional funding to the province under
this particular funding area, which allowed us to increase our funding under
program areas such as the Job Grant program and other programs that we support
through the WDA program.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
There was $6,668,700 more budgeted this year compared to what was spent last
year. Can this be explained, please?
W. MAVIN:
Yes. Again, it goes back to the provision, the carry-forward funding from last
year provided by the federal government in the fall of 2020.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Sir.
Finally, can you give us a breakdown of funding recipients for each program?
G. BYRNE:
Would you be able to clarify? When you say a breakdown of funding recipients,
we'd have to do an analysis as to whether or not we can provide the names of the
individuals.
C. TIBBS:
Sure.
G. BYRNE:
Is there any other kind of more aggregate or macro-evaluation that you'd be
looking at?
Debbie, would you know if we're restricted from –?
D. DUNPHY:
Yeah. Well, certainly I think we can provide it by program, and certainly if
there are organizations or employers.
C. TIBBS:
Yeah, the macro or the higher level.
D. DUNPHY:
But, again, not the individual.
C. TIBBS:
Of course.
D. DUNPHY:
Yeah.
C. TIBBS:
Totally understandable.
Employment and Skills Development continued. Employment Assistance Programs for
Persons with Disabilities, 2.1.05, Allowances and Assistance: There is
$2,593,100 more budgeted this year compared to what was spent last year. Can
you, please, explain this? That's Employment Assistance Programs for Persons
with Disabilities, Allowances and Assistance.
G. BYRNE:
Well, we have the opportunity. A certain amount of the WDA, as we know, must be
spent directly on individuals with barriers to labour market access because of a
disability.
C. TIBBS:
Of course.
G. BYRNE:
So it's mandated by the federal government that a certain proportion be spent
and we have additional funds, so we intend to spend it in that particular area.
C. TIBBS:
Good area.
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
I remind the hon. Member that his speaking time has expired.
2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive.
Back to you, Mr. Dinn.
Thank you.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Under 2.1.02, again we're visiting Employment Development Programs. Roughly, how
many people go through the programs offered under this subheading in the average
year? Again, a similar question to what I asked before. Last year, the numbers
and if the pandemic affected program availability.
G. BYRNE:
Mr. Mavin.
W. MAVIN:
Given that there are various numbers of program headings, probably in the
interest of time, it's probably best that we prepare that data and provide that
information to you in a listing.
J. DINN:
Thank you. That will be satisfactory.
Again, it's probably going to be the same answer, but I'll leave it out there, I
guess. The key thing is: How do we measure success in these programs? If there
are any statistics on the success rate of the programs, if you could provide us
with an overview of those stats that would be appreciated as well.
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under 2.1.03 – I'm not sure if this was asked or not. Would it be possible to
provide a list of the projects funded through the Job Creation Partnerships
program last year? Is there any follow-up with project facilitators, after the
fact, to gauge the impact of the program?
G. BYRNE:
The answer to both questions would be yes. We can, indeed, provide that and
there's always ongoing program evaluation. We have a number of different
projects. In fact, Job Creation Partnerships are one of the most well
subscribed, of highest interest programs that we offer within the portfolio. So
we obviously want to make sure that's on target.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
So we'll get a list of that when you can. That would be great.
Under 2.1.03: What was the source of the unforeseen expense in Supplies last
year?
G. BYRNE:
On Supplies …
J. DINN:
It was $60,700 and now there is nothing budgeted.
G. BYRNE:
Oh, yes. This would be, not software, but soft items related to remote working
of employees, such as wireless headsets, webcams for regional staff for Zoom
meetings, as well as software packages.
J. DINN:
No computers involved with that, though?
G. BYRNE:
Not in this particular item.
J. DINN:
Okay.
G. BYRNE:
We get into that in Property, Furnishings and Equipment. Laptops would be in the
Property, Furnishings and Equipment item.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under 2.1.04: As I understand it, in the federal revenue line, it's over $25
million. That's simply the carry-over?
G. BYRNE:
(Inaudible.)
J. DINN:
Perfect.
In 2.1.05, what are the sources of federal revenue listed here?
G. BYRNE:
This is the Workforce Development Agreement, Mr. Chair.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under 2.1.06, not all of the money allocated here was actually spent last year.
I assume this has to do with the pandemic?
G. BYRNE:
I'm sorry, the specific question again?
J. DINN:
Sure thing.
Under 2.1.0.6, Youth and Student Services, not all of the money allocated here
was actually spent last year. I assume this is due to the pandemic?
G. BYRNE:
Yes and no. We had a significant influx of federal funds last year into student
employment programming. That had an overall positive effect on student summer
employment. But I would imagine there would have been some impact by COVID as
well.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under 2.1.07, Apprenticeship and Trades Certification: The
All Hands on Deck report recommends a
review of the apprenticeship and block training program in the province. Does
the department intend to follow this recommendation?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, it's already started and it's an ongoing initiative. When we look at
apprenticeship and trades certification, it's really important to remember that
it is industry that has the lion's share of responsibilities and roles. We, as a
department, make sure that we provide resources for support, for oversight, for
just the general operations of the apprenticeship program, and we have a great
team doing that. But it's really important to recognize that within the
apprenticeship programming, we have trade councils, apprentice organizations
that provide the oversight.
Walt, I'd really like you to pick up on that, because this is kind of an
important point of understanding how apprenticeships are governed and the
oversight that is provided to the process.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
To pick up on the minister's point, as we all know, the apprenticeship is an
on-the-job experience combined with an in-class training program. On average
about 80 per cent of the skills that are acquired by apprentices are attained in
the workplace, so during their block-workplace training. As a result, we work
very closely with the Trade Advisory Committees, who the minister noted.
What's important to note about the Trade Advisory Committees is that they are
comprised of three key stakeholders in the apprenticeship system: employers,
training institutions and journeypersons. For each trade, depending on the stage
that it's at, in terms of the review, depending on whether or not it's a part of
the Atlantic harmonization program, they play a key role in setting the
direction for that particular trade, including the plan of training, which
includes the block exams and level exams.
The role that we play as a department is one of supporter, facilitator and
coordinator. We work very closely with the Provincial Apprenticeship and
Certification Board, who provides direction on apprenticeships. We can't
understate the importance of the key stakeholders that we have in our
apprenticeship system here in Newfoundland and Labrador.
J. DINN:
Okay, thank you.
In that same section, 2.1.07: The department was mandated to provide better
access to online training and services for apprenticeships and trade
certification. Can you provide an update on the progress in that area?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, we can. In fact, I'll begin by just exposing one of the products, one of
the outcomes.
The virtual training strategist is an online computer system to assist those
looking to take the Red Seal exam, the final national exam that we're having
difficulties in: Individuals who have taken the exam had not been successful.
The virtual learning strategist online program, which we're now working with the
Province of New Brunswick collaboratively to develop an online training system
to be able to support those that have gone through apprenticeship training and
to boost their chances. People who had already met with less success than they
would've liked, we're supporting that. That's just one example.
Also a lot of the block training now, through the pandemic there were elements
of online support and training for that. That's a key component of how online
learning has begun.
The other thing that I note is that often when an apprentice is employed and
successfully employed, embedded in a business, the last thing they really want
to do is to leave their employer and then to go into the classroom for block
training. We're working to try to implement more and more programming so that
the classroom-based block training can be delivered at the workplace itself.
I'll just use this as a sort of an off-the-cuff example: You have an apprentice
working in IOC making really good money. I don't know about you, but the last
thing I'd want to do if I was in that situation is just say: Put the brakes on
it all. Go to Seal Cove and let's go do some block training. If I were the
apprentice, I'd want to try to do that block training as best as I could in Lab
City.
We're always working to new ways to sort of provide that block training and to
try to facilitate as much as possible no gaps, no stoppages in that successful
employment, while at the same time getting apprentices through all the
prerequisite levels that they require.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
I remind the hon. Member his speaking time is expired.
2.1.01 to – oh, I'm sorry. We will recognize MHA Trimper.
P. TRIMPER:
Just one question, Mr. Chair.
I just wondered if from this department's perspective you could provide an
update on the Labrador Aboriginal Training Partnership and your role in it. I
know there are some concerns about their future. Certainly, they're looking for
the next big project. We had a very interesting Estimates here last night, and
the ADM in Transportation and Infrastructure, Mr. John Baker, alluded to what I
think is an interesting idea. I was going to reach out to Mr. Keith Jacque this
morning.
He talked about the need for so many deckhands and other positions aboard the
various ferries in our province. I just wanted to throw those two ideas out to
you and just wondered what you're seeing for LATP. It has proven itself to be a
very nimble and successful way to get a lot of folks with those needed skills
into an opportunity right away.
G. BYRNE:
Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair.
Walter, you're intimately aware of the ongoing evolution of that, so please go
ahead.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
Yes, we have been a proud partner and directly involved with Keith Jacque and
his team for the past number of years. The last conversation I know that myself
and our team had with Keith was probably a couple of months ago. At that time,
he had indicated that there was a little bit of concern getting to the end of
the current federal funding that they had. We had talked about the potential for
the department to be there to support them in some manner if there was a bridge
period that they were looking at.
The Labrador Aboriginal Training Partnership is a key initiative. From our
perspective, we are full in, supporting Keith and his team. We'll do what we can
to support Keith and his team going forward because they've done some tremendous
work in the Labrador area.
P. TRIMPER:
Thank you very much.
CHAIR:
Thank you, MHA Trimper.
2.1.01 to 2.1.07, back to you, MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
We're going to continue 2.1.05, under Employment Assistance Programs for Persons
with Disabilities. Under the Allowances and Assistance, how many clients were
funded under each program?
G. BYRNE:
I'll let Mr. Mavin take that over.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
The most significant program in this particular vote area would be the Supported
Employment program, which provides assistance to individuals with intellectual
disabilities to participate fully in the workforce. We have a network of 17
employment corporations across the province who do tremendous work in
facilitating employment opportunities and supporting persons with intellectual
disabilities in the workplace. We can provide more specific details, but on
average, there would be in excess of 500 individuals with intellectual
disabilities supported through this program annually.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent program.
Thank you.
Which employment corporations receive funding and how much? Could we get a list
of that as well?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, you can.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Minister.
Under Grants and Subsidies, which organizations have community partnership
agreements with government and how much was allocated to each organization?
G. BYRNE:
We can get you that list.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Minister.
We'll move to 2.1.06, Youth and Student Services. Allowances and Assistance: How
many clients were funded under the tuition vouchers?
G. BYRNE:
I don't know, Walt, if you have information readily available.
W. MAVIN:
We'd have to go grab that information. It's a separate listing.
D. DUNPHY:
(Inaudible.)
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Debbie, for reminding me.
In 2021, about 550 individuals.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much.
What would we do without Debbie?
G. BYRNE:
There you go.
C. TIBBS:
I bet you ask that all the time.
G. BYRNE:
We do indeed. We do indeed.
C. TIBBS:
Under Grants and Subsidies again, can you give us a breakdown of what
organizations have service agreements for youth and how many youth were funded
by organizations?
W. MAVIN:
Yes, we can provide that listing.
C. TIBBS:
Great, thank you.
Employment Skills Development continued, 2.1.07, Apprenticeship and Trades
Certification: How many active and newly registered apprentices are there?
G. BYRNE:
Fortunately, I'm blessed with people who anticipate good questions and provide
good answers.
Right now, we have, as of the end of the year, March 2021, 3,194 active
apprentices in Newfoundland and Labrador and within the past year 371 newly
registered apprentices.
C. TIBBS:
Great. Thank you, Minister.
Keeping with at the same heading, how many block exams have been administered?
G. BYRNE:
Within the previous year – and, again, March 31 of 2021 – there were 191 block
exams administered.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
How many new journeypersons have been certified?
G. BYRNE:
Within the journeypersons, the …
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
G. BYRNE:
Whispers here telling me apprentices, 179. Yes, I can see that now.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
How many Trade Advisory Committee meetings have there been?
G. BYRNE:
During the pandemic period, there were 51 Trade Advisory Committee meetings.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent.
We'll move on to Salaries right now – sorry, Transportation and Communications.
There was $181,300 less spent compared to what was budgeted. Can you explain
this and give us a breakdown of what didn't get spent due to COVID?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, there was a significant decrease. A lot energy is spent on Atlantic
harmonization and working on that. Obviously, during the pandemic there was both
a reduction of Atlantic and national meetings, which accounted for $53,000 in
the reduction. There was a reduction in employer meetings within the regions of
around $11,000 and divisional travel was reduced by $10,000 with more virtual
meetings being offered.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Professional Services: There was $62,500 less spent compared to what was
budgeted. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
During the pandemic, one of the things true with the Apprenticeship and Trades
Certification programs is that site visits are made to training institutions.
During the course of the pandemic with, of course, those institutions being
either closed or reduced in operations, those site visits were reduced.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Under Purchased Services: There was $3,904,900 less spent last year compared to
what was budgeted. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Under the industrial training program there were savings mainly related to the
reduced demand as a result of COVID-19 under the industrial training programs.
There were also reduced costs under the computer program implementation.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect. Thank you, Minister.
We'll move on to Grants and Subsidies: There was $236,400 less spent last year
compared to what was budgeted. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Walt, I think you might be able to take up that cause.
W. MAVIN:
Thank you, Minister.
Essentially, it's lower than anticipated demand for apprenticeship programming.
C. TIBBS:
Makes sense. Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
There's an additional $89,600 budgeted this year compared to last year. Can this
be explained, please?
W. MAVIN:
This is specific to the Office to Advance Women Apprentices and it's simply the
annualization of their funding for '21-'22.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Mavin.
Finally, can you provide a breakdown, please, of the Government Hiring
Apprentices Program by placement?
G. BYRNE:
When you say “placement,” Mr. Chair, what do you mean by placement?
C. TIBBS:
The departments, which department they would –
G. BYRNE:
Oh, I see, okay. Yes, I understand. The program that facilities other
departments to hire apprentices within – yes, we certainly can.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, gentlemen.
That's all I have for that subheading right now.
CHAIR (Reid):
MHA Dinn.
Just for the record, it's MHA Reid filling in for MHA Warr in the Chair.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I was wondering who was behind the mask there.
Under section 2.1.07: There's a slight increase to the budget for Salaries. Was
there a new position?
G. BYRNE:
No, there was approved salary increases, plus the removal of additional funding
under the 27th pay period. There is no new position created there.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Two other questions on this and then I'm done.
Under Purchased Services: $6.1 million budgeted and quite a bit of money. Is it
possible to give us a brief survey on what this money is usually spent on? I
believe you talked about the industrial relations program, but I'm just
wondering what normally would be spent here, typically be spent on in this
section.
G. BYRNE:
Walt, do you want to take it away?
W. MAVIN:
Yes, the bulk of this money in this particular category is used to support block
training. It's the purchase of block training for apprentices as they move
through, and last year we saw a significant drop in the number of class calls.
J. DINN:
Okay, thank you.
Finally, federal revenue is also way lower than expected. What money were we
expecting but didn't receive?
G. BYRNE:
Go ahead there, Walt.
W. MAVIN:
There was an adjustment there. The federal revenue here is through the Labour
Market Development Agreement. Last year we adjust under the LMDA where we have
requirements for funding. In an area related to my previous answer, when we were
seeing a drop in the class calls there was a subsequent aligned reduction in
federal revenue.
J. DINN:
Just to go back to the block training. The $6.1 million, that's basically for
those who are – to go back and do the classwork that they need?
G. BYRNE:
Go ahead, Walt.
W. MAVIN:
Yes, essentially. As an example, when an apprentice does their pre-employment in
welding, secures an employment placement, attains their required 1,800 hours in
the workplace and then they're required to go to their first block training. The
cost of that training, the tuition at the training institution, is provided on
behalf of the apprentice through this funding.
J. DINN:
So it's a form of tuition freeze or a benefit to a person doing the training.
It's a form of tuition benefit, then.
W. MAVIN:
Yes. The cost of training is provided through the department.
J. DINN:
Okay. I was just looking at it in terms of the tuition freeze from Memorial
University students as well. That's why I'm looking at the comparison. So there
is tuition assistance or tuition is paid for those in trades (inaudible).
G. BYRNE:
Mr. Chair, so it could be pointed out that not everyone who enters the program
would be assisted. Those who are EI eligible would be able to avail of that
particular program, but there are individuals who go through the program that
are not necessarily assisted.
Within the apprenticeship program, if you think about it, there are some very
lucrative supports that are offered highlighting the priority we put on the
skilled trades. In addition, for those clients that are EI eligible, they can,
indeed, get their pre-apprenticeship programming sponsored or supported. Then
when they go into the workplace, there are relatively generous wage subsidies
offered to their employer while they collect the prerequisite number of hours,
working under a journeyperson, to be able to meet the requirements for that
particular block. Then when they go to the block training, if they are EI
eligible, then there are sponsorships that are available and supports that are
offered.
There is a full range of supports that are eligible, but not everybody. There
are individuals that go through, that start the pre-apprenticeship program that
are not EI eligible and that do so either through student loans or other means.
J. DINN:
Would it be possible to get the full cost, then, or a breakdown of the supports?
Like, the $6.1 million, plus the wage subsidy offered to employers and so on and
so forth. Would it be possible to have a – to those doing the trades programs
and that. I'm just trying to get a – so I can compare apples to apples when it
comes to tuition supports and that in place for MUN, plus the supports that are
put in place for those doing a trade or entering the College of the North
Atlantic or elsewhere. That's what I'd be interested in. If you can provide
that, that'd be great.
G. BYRNE:
We certainly can provide a certain amount of information in that regard. I would
not want any Member to assume that it's a fixed cost. Different programs have
different tuition expenses. Different employers, through the wage subsidy, will
be eligible for different amounts of support.
Memorial University of Newfoundland, of course, is a different entity; not under
this department. I guess one could argue that – not to be argumentative about it
– the supports of $230 million-plus for Memorial University and a grant in lieu,
which are not provided to the private institutions, we'd have to factor that in
as a tuition offset or consideration of tuition.
Would the hon. Member be able to refine his request so that we can better
understand it? Because there is certain information that we can provide at an
aggregate level for the trades, but I think, Mr. Chair, he may have also asked
for comparisons to Memorial University of Newfoundland and that's more of a
difficult comparison for us to be able to make.
J. DINN:
I'm just trying to find the line here now, the exact number with regard to
tuition-offset amounts for Memorial. I'm just trying to compare the total number
of support that would be comparable for the trades through CNA. That's basically
what I'm looking at. I think it was some $60 million-plus in terms of grants or
the tuition offset.
Anyway, I'm just trying to get an idea of, like, what's the amount of money –
the money that government will no longer provide, I guess, after this, but
comparing that to what's provided in the trades. Whether it's through the $6.1
million for tuition, wage subsidies and so on and so forth. That's what I'm
looking at. I'll get the exact number and refine that for you, Minister, but I'm
just trying to figure out what is the amount. Because I'm assuming that $6.1
million will continue after this year and after next year.
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
G. BYRNE:
Yes, that's funded through the LMDA.
So, yes, if the –
J. DINN:
Ah, so I have it here. It's $68 million for tuition offsets. Now, I'm assuming
it's not going to be anything close to that, but I'd be interested in just
seeing what – sort of like what I'm looking at, the total amount of supports,
financial resources that are put in place to those entering the trades versus
those who enter university.
Thank you.
G. BYRNE:
We can certainly do that.
J. DINN:
I'm done with that section now.
CHAIR:
No further questions on those sections?
C. TIBBS:
No, we can move on to the next, when you're ready, Mr. Chair.
CHAIR:
Okay, we'll vote on those headings.
Sections 2.1.01 to 2.1.07 inclusive, do these subheadings carry?
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, subheads 2.1.01 through 2.1.07 carried.
CLERK:
3.1.01 to 4.1.02 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Okay.
The question is: Do the subheadings 3.1.01 to 4.1.02 inclusive carry?
The next speaker is MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
3.1.01, Client Services, Salaries: There's $871,000 less being budgeted than
what was spent last year; can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
I think Debbie or Walt – Debbie?
D. DUNPHY:
In '20-'21, we charged less of our provincial salaries off here under the LMDA,
so the cost was higher under provincial dollars. But going forward, what we've
done is we had to – again, as I noted at the beginning of our session, we review
our salaries annually, so we did look at attrition and we had to remove the
funding for the 27th pay period, which is significant in this particular
activity, and we've added on the salary increases.
But as you'll see from the investment made in Immigration, there is a
significant increase in salary cost in that branch and so to assist in
facilitating some of those increases, some of the new positions for Immigration,
we did find some vacant positions here that we've eliminated under this head but
will show up to create positions under the immigration program.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ma'am.
Under Transportation and Communications, there's $34,900 more budgeted this year
compared to what was spent last year. Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, can that be explained?
D. DUNPHY:
We reviewed our travel requirements and, of course, the last fiscal year was
impacted relating to COVID. But one of the things that are covered here are
postage as well as telecommunications. There are 19 regional offices across the
province, so there is a significant cost for that communication and for some
travel within the offices and to various worksites and such. We did do a refresh
on what we anticipated for '21-22 and we did increase the budget slightly.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ms. Dunphy.
Purchased Services: There was $107,500 more budgeted this year compared to what
was spent last year; can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
There was, last year, lower than anticipated costs due to the offices being
closed for a portion of the fiscal year. The staff were working from home during
COVID, so those Purchased Services faced downward pressure as a result.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Under Property, Furnishings and Equipment, there was $31,500 more sent last year
compared to what was budgeted. Can this be explained?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, it can. For this particular group of client services officers, this was for
laptops working from home.
C. TIBBS:
Laptops, good stuff. Thank you, Minister.
We move on to Immigration and Workforce Development. I have a couple of general
questions here for you.
Can you provide a breakdown of the provincial nomination program numbers and the
Atlantic Immigration Pilot endorsement?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, we can. The PNP, Provincial Nominee Program, numbers from January 1 to
April 30 in 2021 – we did face a result from COVID and travel restrictions and
so on. We still had a total number of principal applications of 87, with 75
family members following suit, for 162 in the first quarter of 2021. In 2020, we
saw an overall result of 760 PNP applicants, up from 2019, which experienced 689
applicants and their families, which is up from 2018 when we saw 497. PNP
numbers and AIP numbers were on a relatively upward trend for the past number of
years.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Can you provide a breakdown of retention rates by immigration class with a
comparison to the Atlantic provinces by landing year?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, we can. I don't have it in front of me right now but – yes, I do, actually.
Wow, amazing.
So there's some conversation that occurs that Newfoundland and Labrador is not
doing so well when it comes to retention rates. When we compare it to our
Maritime neighbours, actually Newfoundland and Labrador is doing exceptionally
well.
We've always strived to do better, but in the last five years since 2013-2018,
for example, where we have hard statistics, PEI had a retention rate of around
40 per cent. New Brunswick had a retention rate of around 48 per cent. While
Newfoundland and Labrador had a retention rate of almost 51 per cent. So we
exceeded both the retention rates of PEI and New Brunswick. Nova Scotia in a
five-year period did very well with 62 per cent. But we're anticipating that
with our increased emphasis on retention that we'll start to improve those
numbers as well.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent. I hope so as well.
Can you provide a breakdown of retention rates of international students and
out-of-province, domestic Canadian students that have attended our
post-secondary institutions by landing year?
G. BYRNE:
That's a very, very good question. I'm going to ask Katie Norman if you might
have some of that readily available.
K. NORMAN:
Thank you for the question. That's something that we'd have to connect with
Memorial University on, but we certainly will do and advise if we can provide
that.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Ms. Norman.
We'll move on to 4.1.01, Office of Immigration and Multiculturalism, Salaries.
There is $802,800 more budgeted this year, compared to what was spent last year.
Can this be explained, please?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, we can. This common fiscal year, as the budget reflected, there was an
increase in the staffing complement within the Office of Immigration and
Multiculturalism. We intended to provide an additional 18 positions in that
office, with six coming from within existing budget sources. That's for the
first six months and when it's annualized, it will come to about $1.3 million in
annual salary increases.
So we took a decision. I'll proactively or pre-emptively answer potential
questions. For Newfoundland and Labrador to succeed in a national competition
for interest and performance in immigration to attract new applicants to our PNP
and AIPP streams, what would be required to be able to meet what other provinces
are performing at? So we took the example of other jurisdictions. To meet our
intended target of 5,100 new Newfoundlanders and Labradorians per year, we
looked at other jurisdictions and how they were resourcing their offices of
immigration. We looked at their number of staff, how much they spent on
promotions and other things and in order for us to succeed based on existing
data, on existing performance that we can glean from other provinces, this was
the resourcing level that would be required.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent, thank you.
Professional Services: There was $51,400 more budgeted this year compared to
what was spent last year. Can this be explained as well?
G. BYRNE:
On Professional Services, there was increase related to training for staff and
the Newfoundland and Labrador contribution to the Provincial-Territorial
Immigration Secretariat. The annual fees and other things such as promotion are
needed for publications. We needed access to copyrighted stock photography,
which was $5,000. It's different things like that.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you, Minister.
Purchased Services, there seems to be $1,045,800 more budgeted this year
compared to what spent last year. Can this be explained and give a breakdown as
well?
G. BYRNE:
The additional funding this year, as noted in the budget that was read recently,
we're spending resources on active promotion of Newfoundland and Labrador as a
desirable place to seek permanent residency. This year we're anticipating a
$1-million drawdown on promotional activities, and annualized that will become
$2 million. Again, this was taken not just by arbitrary; this would be a nice
thing to have. We looked at other jurisdictions that were successful at
attracting 5,100 people per year and how they did that. We drew on those
experiences to be able to come to the conclusion that in order for us to be
successful in that kind of a global competition for hearts and minds, these are
the resources we needed to spend.
C. TIBBS:
Excellent. We want to be competitive. Thank you, Minister.
CHAIR:
MHA Dinn.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Under 4.1.01, is it possible to have an update on the implementation of the
Immigration Action Plan and how many recommendations remain to be implemented?
G. BYRNE:
Yes, I'll ask Katie Norman to go through some of the nuances of this. Katie was
intimately involved in previous experiences within Cabinet Secretariat on this
and now takes up the role as the chief in charge of getting this work done.
Katie?
K. NORMAN:
Thank you, Minister, for that.
MHA Dinn, we can certainly provide you an update on where we are with the
Immigration Action Plan. That's something we're actively tracking. As you're
probably aware, we're in year five of that action plan now. Getting to the point
where, yes, it's important to look back on what we've achieved. I think there is
recognition within the department that with government setting such an ambitious
target, I think, where demographics would suggest where we need to be of
welcoming 5,100 newcomers, we're looking at those actions to, I guess, challenge
ourselves to say: Are they the most ambitious they can be and will they get us
to the target?
We can certainly provide you with an update. I think there are 50-plus actions
in the plan. We can get you detail on that in terms of looking back at what
we've accomplished for sure.
J. DINN:
Excellent.
Do we have an idea of how many recommendations remain to be implemented? Are we
75 per cent complete or …?
K. NORMAN:
I don't have that number in front of me, but we can include that with what we
provide to you.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under Purchased Services, it was far lower than it was expected: $53,000 down to
$23,000 and then up to a million-plus.
G. BYRNE:
Yes, I can speak to this, Mr. Chair.
Purchased Services, not only that particular bracket, includes our intention to
up the pace and magnitude of our promotions, our international promotions.
Encompassing that is also trade shows and venues. Expos is probably the better
way to describe that – immigration expos, our attendance at immigration expos
during COVID-19. We've often attended expos in Brussels, in Dublin and other
places. During COVID, they were not taken up. We reduced our expenses
accordingly.
J. DINN:
Basically, you're looking at, this year, that as we get COVID under control more
or less, these expos and that will proceed and we'll be present there.
G. BYRNE:
Well, hopefully. Some of these expos will be run virtually. There's been a pivot
within the organizations, the structures that sponsor or host those kind of
venues or expos. That number also includes the intention to be more aggressive
in terms of promotional campaigns, both digital, online and other medium, to be
able to promote Newfoundland and Labrador as an attractive place to consider
moving to.
J. DINN:
Okay.
I'm familiar with job fairs and the like, so I would assume here a similar
thing. Certain people who go to this are looking for an opportunity elsewhere
and in other parts of the world, let's say. You're probably looking at
professionals, tradespeople and so on and so forth.
G. BYRNE:
That's correct. We participate with the other Atlantic provinces in booths. We
cost share booths at immigration fairs in Brussels, in Dublin and other places,
in Paris.
We're not going to necessarily abandon those markets. I use that word kind of
loosely, but we're not going to abandon those. We're also going to look more
seriously at untrodden ground. Hong Kong is an active place where we need to be
promoting Newfoundland and Labrador as an attractive place to live, within the
Hong Kong community. There are other places.
I had a very interesting conversation just about a week ago with the ambassador
for Uzbekistan to Canada, the United States and Mexico. He's housed in
Washington. They have an embassy that services North America from Washington.
What he explained to me is that Uzbekistan has a population of about 27 million
people, I think, a huge number of which are young and highly educated,
relatively used to a reasonable standard of living, but without jobs. They're
young, highly talented and looking for places.
The Government of Uzbekistan is actively trying to place young people in various
places where – I suspect to relieve some domestic political tensions. You have
young people, highly educated, very highly skilled, with not a whole lot to do.
It wouldn't be a great place to be. The Uzbekistani government is actively
looking for places for their citizens to be able to live, to work and to
generate families. I don't think Uzbekistan would necessarily be considered in
the past a target market or a target place for Newfoundland and Labrador
immigration, but sometimes you just have to think outside the box.
This was an opportunity that came to us not from our own, sort of, reach or
search. It was the ambassador to Canada from Uzbekistan that reached out to me,
and so we're actively working. That's just one of many examples where the same
trodden ground it not necessarily going to be as fruitful as fresh eyes, as new
ground.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
I go back to a point, then, that we made at the beginning, which has to do with
assisting immigrants and that who are already highly skilled, highly educated
and are stuck delivering food, driving cabs and so on and so forth, and who are
probably looking at the jobs that they want. They want jobs where they're going
to be able to use their skill sets. Again, if they're coming, then I'm assuming
they're expecting to work in their field, so I guess we still need to make sure
that those supports are there as well.
Under Grants and Subsidies: Money was left on the table last year and we're
nonetheless increasing the budget for this year. What types of new initiatives,
that we're looking to support, what would they be?
G. BYRNE:
With the Grants and Subsidies, they were revised down last year to $315,000.
That was, indeed, from COVID-19 impacts on organizations and the ability to
lever more federal funding. While there was some downward pressure on demand, as
a result of COVID, it reduced activity within our partner organizations, as a
result of COVID. The other cause of this was we were able to lever federal
funding for projects, which resulted in savings of provincial funds.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
Under 4.1.02, Workforce Development and Productivity Secretariat: There's a
significant drop this year in the budget for Salaries. Have people been moved
out of the office or will the jobs be eliminated?
G. BYRNE:
Walt, I'll get you to look at that. Oh, sorry.
K. NORMAN:
Neither, actually.
What was occurring here in the budget for the last number of years was
Newfoundland and Labrador was hosting two intergovernmental secretariats. One
was the federal-provincial-territorial Forum of Labour Market Ministers and the
other was the Atlantic Workforce Partnership initiative of the Council of
Atlantic Premiers. There were six contractual positions associated that were
being funded out of the Workforce Development Secretariat. Those secretariats
have now moved on to other provinces, respectively, and the individuals have
returned to their home positions within the department. That's why you see that
reduction there for Salaries and across various operating was because the
federal and intergovernmental initiatives have moved on to other jurisdictions.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
I know you mentioned this in answer to another question: What was the number of
regional offices that we currently have under 3.1.01, Client Services?
OFFICIAL:
Nineteen.
G. BYRNE:
We have 19.
J. DINN:
Nineteen. Thank you.
A quick one: Why did spending on Professional Services come in under budget last
year?
G. BYRNE:
There was a decrease in cost related to the labour market, to the secretariat –
both the FLMM, of $110,000, and the AWP, of $10,000, which ended on March 31,
2021, for the reasons that Katie Norman has described.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
CHAIR (Warr):
Thank you.
3.1.01 to 4.1.02 inclusive.
Back to you, MHA Tibbs.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Under this heading for Revenue - Provincial: Is this the $250 fee for processing
of provincial nominee applications?
G. BYRNE:
This is under 4.1.02?
C. TIBBS:
Yes, Minister.
OFFICIAL:
(Inaudible.)
C. TIBBS:
4.1.01.
G. BYRNE:
4.1.01.
C. TIBBS:
Yeah.
G. BYRNE:
Revenue - Provincial, and I believe the answer is: Yes, it is.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect.
Just a follow-up question stemming from that: If immigration is forecasted to
increase, why is the amount of revenue in this line item budgeted to be the same
as last year?
G. BYRNE:
I will get Katie to answer that. I'm just trying to – sorry, I'm going to hold
you up.
Katie, would you be able to provide a synopsis of the forecasting?
K. NORMAN:
Certainly.
In terms of the province's commitment to immigration, to the target of 5,100,
that will obviously happen over a period of time. There have been impacts at the
federal level in terms of processing times, so we're anticipating – really,
we're at a point of recovery, trying to get back to earlier levels of
immigration that we've seen.
The thing I would note, as well, with the provincial revenue there, is that not
all components of the immigration program have fees. We anticipate seeing
increases in areas like international graduate students, which there is no fee.
So any increase there wouldn't be reflected. I think it would be in later years,
you know, consideration of what the fees would be and what that would look like
would come later on.
C. TIBBS:
Perfect. Thank you, Ms. Norman.
That's all I have for this subheading.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
MHA Dinn.
J. DINN:
Yes, please, just a few more questions and done.
4.1.02, Purchased Services: The budget was spent last year, yet this year the
budget for this item has almost been completely eliminated. I'm assuming that's
to do with the secretariat, then.
G. BYRNE:
(Inaudible.)
J. DINN:
Yeah, thank you.
G. BYRNE:
Just to be sure –
J. DINN:
I had a head nod. I wasn't sure.
G. BYRNE:
Yes, it is.
J. DINN:
Yeah.
G. BYRNE:
Yeah.
J. DINN:
Okay.
There's a similar to pattern to budgets under Property, Furnishings and
Equipment, the same reasons?
G. BYRNE:
Yes. Katie, (inaudible).
K. NORMAN:
Yes, that's accurate.
J. DINN:
No Grants and Subsidies budgeted for this year. We also notice that there will
be no federal or provincial revenue either and I guess that would be the same
thing.
G. BYRNE:
(Inaudible.)
J. DINN:
Perfect. Simple answers to simple questions.
I'm done with this section.
I have one general question. There's projected to be an increase – I guess, for
a lack of a better term – in climate refugees, as the Earth's mean temperature
is expected to increase. It's going to have devastating effects on those that
may depend on it for – like when it comes to food production. Have there been
any discussions with your federal counterparts, provincial counterparts and
other jurisdictions about plans to deal with this, if and when it comes, and
probably more likely when it comes? Because the people who will be coming in
looking for a place to live may not necessarily have the skill requirements that
the province is looking for.
G. BYRNE:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Within the space that is maintained, influenced or controlled by provincial and
territorial governments, we're responsible or we have a role to play in economic
immigration. The federal government maintains overall jurisdiction under the
constitutional authorities for immigration. The purpose of the Provincial
Nominee Program, as well as the Atlantic Immigration Pilot project, which
roughly follows the same suit, provincial governments still nominate to the
federal government. This is true of all provinces in Canada, with some variation
in Quebec itself, which has been granted greater autonomies.
But the recognition here is that within the immigration role, provincial
governments, including Newfoundland and Labrador, still nominate to federal
governments on economic immigration. We're very successful. We'll be growing in
our success in terms of economic immigration.
In terms of refugees, this remains a federal role, responsibility and
jurisdiction. All decisions around refugee resettlement, including acceptance of
refugees internationally and partitionment or distribution of refugees within
the Canadian Federation for resettlement, all of those decisions are taken by
the federal government exclusively, with discussion with provincial governments
as to allowable or acceptable targets.
It is the federal government that is responsible for resettlement. Upon arrival
of refugees within a province, the federal government maintains responsibility
for resettlements for up to a year and beyond. Newfoundland and Labrador is one
of only two places that we are aware of – two provinces – where the provincial
government does indeed engage in activity for resettlement. Even though it's a
federal sphere, a federal jurisdiction and federal resources are applied to it,
Newfoundland and Labrador and New Brunswick are the only two provinces that we
are aware of that actually supports the federal government in refugee
resettlement.
We do so very deliberately. We want our refugees to be successful. We negotiate
with the federal government on an annual basis on the number of refugees that
would come to Newfoundland and Labrador. The federal government has the final
say. But we want that resettlement to be successful.
Yes, the answer is there are ongoing discussions with our federal counterpart on
refugees and future demand for refugees. It's part of the FPT, the
federal-provincial-territorial exercise on immigration to have these discussions
both bilaterally and multilaterally within the Canadian Federation. We're always
involved in forecasts for anticipated refugee resettlements.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
The only other comment I would make has to do with the population. If you have a
chance to read the book the Empty Planet
by Bricker and Ibbitson, they postulate that, worldwide, the population of
the world is actually now starting a decline. One of the things that they do say
is that Canada has done a much better job with regard to immigration. We're
going to rely more and more on immigration than ever to maintain our
populations. I think the replacement rate is much lower than what is needed.
I go back, then, to some facts, statistics that you provided. When it came to
the retention rates, Newfoundland is 51 per cent and we're still higher, but not
much than New Brunswick and PEI. But Nova Scotia seems to be doing remarkably
better at attracting people or retaining them, and I can think of several
reasons why. Obviously, in Newfoundland and Labrador, the need for immigration
is significantly greater.
I'm just wondering: What, then, is Nova Scotia doing that they seem to be – or
what are the factors that makes the retention rate higher there than it does in
any of the other three Atlantic provinces and what can we learn from it?
G. BYRNE:
Well, that's a very good question. We're studying it.
One of the things that Nova Scotia does do, in terms of attraction, for example,
is they have 10 universities. Nova Scotia hosts 10 universities with 48,000
students annually. It's worth noting whenever we make comparisons of
Newfoundland and Labrador to Nova Scotia in terms of post-secondary education,
Newfoundland and Labrador provides more support for Memorial University of
Newfoundland in its base operating grant than the Government of Nova Scotia
offers to all 10 universities in Nova Scotia combined. Nova Scotia has higher
tuition costs, especially for international students, yet they're attracting
more immigrants.
It's a valuable conversation and I'm glad you raised it because sometimes what
appears to be straightforward, or A meets, goes to B and goes to C is not
necessarily always the case. Nova Scotia has 48,000 university students that
come to it annually; it offers less support for its 10 universities than
Memorial University of Newfoundland is offered by the Government of Newfoundland
and Labrador for one university. They've met with certain successes. Sometimes
examining Nova Scotia is worthwhile, but it's not necessarily a perfect
apple-to-apple comparison. They do have a pretty strong – I would argue Nova
Scotia has been in the field longer than us so they have more institutional
knowledge and capacity in terms of immigration, but it is our intention to
surpass them.
J. DINN:
Thank you.
That's it, Chair.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
We'll turn the table to MHA Trimper.
P. TRIMPER:
My final question, Mr. Chair.
I wanted to ask about Welcome NL, a very interesting initiative that was piloted
in the Happy Valley-Goose Bay area in 2017 as part of
The Way Forward. It's ended and I
just wondered why it stopped and what the department is feeling in terms of
whether there's a possibility of something like that returning. It was a
partnership with Municipalities NL.
G. BYRNE:
I'll get Katie Norman – I have some overarching awareness of the program itself,
but I'm not as familiar with the details. We might be able to get you those
details, unless, Katie, you're prepared to speak to it now.
K. NORMAN:
I don't have the information off the top of my head, but certainly, we can
provide an update on where the funding came from and whether the increased
funding and settlement under Grants and Subsidies this year may be an option for
that organization.
P. TRIMPER:
Okay, yeah. Thank you.
It's interesting, you know, it was sort of a larger-than-life present hunt. It
was well received in Happy Valley-Goose Bay and the Upper Lake Melville area, I
thought. Interacted with hundreds of new Canadians. Worked well in partnership
with the Association for New Canadians. Anyway, I think it would be good to see
it reinstated, or if there were particular faults with it, if you were to
consider some way to improve on that and come back. It was that real hands-on,
almost a navigator support for the employer and the new Canadians seeking an
opportunity in our country and in our province.
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Is the Committee ready for the question?
Shall 3.1.01 to 4.1.02 inclusive carry?
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, subheads 3.1.01 through 4.1.02 carried.
CLERK:
Total.
CHAIR:
Shall the total carry?
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, Department of Immigration, Population Growth and Skills, total heads,
carried.
CHAIR:
Shall I report the Estimates of the Department of Immigration, Population Growth
and Skills carried?
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On motion, Estimates of the Department of Immigration, Population Growth and
Skills carried without amendment.
CHAIR:
I offer MHA Tibbs some closing remarks, please.
C. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. A job well done by you and MHA Reid.
Thank you very much everybody for coming today and giving us the information.
It's very, very important, and moving forward now I think your department is
more important than any other for population growth and immigration and whatnot.
I can see that the department is in competent hands after meeting the minister's
team today. So I applaud you all for the work that you do. Like I said, it's
very important and it's very important to me as well.
I look forward to working with the minister moving forward over the next couple
of years and everybody in the department. I know I've spoken to Jeremy now a
couple of times and very accommodating. I thank you very much for your help. I
look forward to working with you to bring much success, pride and prosperity
back to Newfoundland and Labrador.
Thank you very much.
CHAIR:
Thank you, MHA Tibbs.
MHA Dinn.
J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I, too, certainly join my colleague in recognizing the importance of this
department. Certainly, with an aging population and a declining population in
many ways, having young people, families and that staying here is important.
Certainly, the students at Holy Heart are a prime example of that; many of them
are planning to stay here in Newfoundland and Labrador. We just need to make
sure the conditions are right and that they will want to stay here and that they
get their education.
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
Minister, I'll offer some closing remarks for you as well.
G. BYRNE:
Well, thank you to the Members of the Committee.
I really appreciate the exchange we've had today. I hope it was informative for
you, but it was certainly very helpful to me, being able to focus my mind on a
couple of issues, in particular related to apprenticeships and to immigration.
I also want to echo some of the comments, the respectful attitude that was held
to the executive of the department. I really have to say I'm blessed with my
dream team. We will have some obvious challenges over the coming years as we
come out of COVID, but I also reflect on the fact that these challenges often
open up new avenues, new on-ramps for new ideas to be able to adapt to new
realities and so we look forward to that.
Thank you all very much. I really appreciate being here today with you.
CHAIR:
Thank you, Minister.
Just before we end the meeting, I, too, want to thank both the department and
the Committee for their participation this morning and certainly to our Clerk in
her diligence in the preparation of this meeting. Again, thank you MHA Scott
Reid for filling in for me to attend an item that I had to attend to this
morning.
We will be considering the Estimates of the Department of Environment and
Climate Change, which will be our next meeting, tomorrow, Wednesday, June 9 at
5:30 p.m.
Seeing nothing else on the agenda, I look for a motion to adjourn.
C. PARDY:
So moved.
CHAIR:
So moved by MHA Pardy.
Thank you, everybody.
On motion, the Committee adjourned.