April 8, 2022
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Derrick Bragg, MHA for
Fogo Island - Cape Freels, substitutes for Paul Pike, MHA for Burin - Grand
Bank.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Helen Conway
Ottenheimer, MHA for Harbour Main, substitutes for Jeff Dwyer, MHA for Placentia
West - Bellevue.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Sarah Stoodley, MHA for
Mount Scio, substitutes for Scott Reid, MHA for St. George's - Humber.
Pursuant to Standing Order 68, Lela Evans, MHA for
Torngat Mountains, substitutes for James Dinn, MHA for St. John's Centre.
The Committee met at 9 a.m. in the Assembly Chamber.
CHAIR (Gambin-Walsh):
Okay, I'd like to call
this Estimates to order, please.
I'd like
to bring the Committee's attention to the minutes dated for June 8, 2021, and
ask for someone to move those minutes.
D. BRAGG:
So moved.
CHAIR:
Okay, Minister Bragg moved
those minutes, and I don't need a seconder for that.
On
motion, minutes adopted as circulated.
CHAIR:
I just want to say that it's
9:02 so we'll probably take a break about 10:30. I just want to put that on the
record for those that are on the other side of the screen here, for about 10
minutes at that time.
Let's
see if there's anything else – substitutes. So we do have some substitutes here
today. We have substituting for Burin - Grand Bank, Fogo Island - Cape Freels,
Minister Derrick Bragg. We have substituting for St. George's - Humber, MHA
Reid, Mount Scio, Minister Sarah Stoodley. We have substituting for Placentia
West - Bellevue, MHA Helen Conway Ottenheimer. And we have substituting for St.
John's Centre, Torngat Mountains, Lela Evans.
So I
just want to remind you before we start here. I ask you to wait until your light
comes on. Then identify yourself and if your light doesn't come on, if you could
just give a little wave so that they can see you and then they'll be able to
identify you.
We've
quite the crew here this morning. So I'm going to ask the minister to introduce
those who are with us and start Estimates.
J. HOGAN:
Thank you very much.
Good
morning, everybody. Thanks for being here today.
For the
record, I am John Hogan, Minister of Justice and Public Safety and Attorney
General. I want to provide you all with some suggestions on how to handle the
questions here today. I'll take your questions, of course, but when necessary, I
will take the liberty to pass your questions to one of the many department
officials here and invite them to fill in details, as they are the experts of
the content in the department.
I would
like to acknowledge the officials that are unable to join us today from our
courts and police services. I would like to thank them for their hard work and
thank those that have steeped in today on their behalf.
I think
now would it be a good time to do introductions. So if we can probably start
down here at the end and go down the line and we'll snake around.
G. SMITH: Gerrie Smith, Assistant Deputy Minister, Public Safety
and Correctional Services.
D. WOODROW: Denise Woodrow, Assistant Deputy Minister of Legal
Services.
A. GREEN: Andrew Green, Departmental Controller.
D. MAHONEY: Denis Mahoney, Deputy Minister of Justice and Public
Safety and Deputy Attorney General.
H. JACOBS: Heather Jacobs, Advisor, Justice and Public Safety.
L. STRICKLAND: Lloyd Strickland, Director of Public
Prosecutions.
K. SEARS: Kerry Sears, Sheriff's Office, Manager of Equipment,
Training and Organizational Development.
S. FOSS: Susan Foss, Registrar of Supreme Court, standing in
for Shelley Organ, the Chief Executive Officer of the Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court.
K. HARDING: Kim Harding, Executive Director, Royal Newfoundland
Constabulary, standing in for Chief Patrick Roche.
K.
MARTIN:
Kellee Martin, Director of Policy and Strategic Planning.
D.
CHAFE:
Dan Chafe, Superintendent of Prisons.
S. SIMMONS: Sharleen Simmons, Strategic Policy Analyst.
T. HAYWARD: Thomas Hayward, Manager of Budgeting.
L. CLARKE: Lesley Clarke, Director of Communications.
E. GILLINGHAM: Emily-Jane Gillingham, Media Relations Manager.
G. ELLIS: Glenda Ellis, Executive Assistant to the Minister.
J. HOGAN:
We'll take a few minutes before we get to the questions
to just provide some highlights in the packages. The package that has been
handed to you this morning.
The
total budget for the Department of Justice and Public Safety this year is
approximately –
CHAIR:
Minister, we are just
wondering if you want to say a few words but before you start in Estimates, we
need to call the numbers.
CLERK (Barnes):
We are proceeding according to subhead.
So it is
Executive and Support Services, 1.1.01 to 1.3.01.
CHAIR:
Shall 1.1.01 to 1.3.01
inclusive carry?
J. HOGAN:
I don't know how long I can
keep relying on: I'm new.
CHAIR:
We're good.
J. HOGAN:
So the total budget for the
Department of Justice and Public Safety this year was approximately $273
million. Budget decisions this year include almost $21 million for the new
province-wide radio system that will enable emergency responders to communicate
in a timely manner with one another; an additional $17 million in annual funding
to support the work of the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador – the first big
increase they have seen in almost a decade; more than $1.8 million is allocated
for fire protection vehicle and firefighting equipment; $1 million in additional
funding for the NL Search and Rescue Association, which stems from a
recommendation from the ground search and rescue inquiry; $326,000 for the Drug
Treatment Court; almost $400,000 to expand the Family Violence Intervention
Court; $4 million for the Inquiry into the Treatment, Experiences and Outcomes
of Innu in the Child Protection System.
In
response to a request from the Provincial Court, this year's budget will include
funding to establish one judicial position that will travel and be deployed as
necessary to other court centres and circuits as needed to help address areas of
concern where there is an increase in demand for extra judicial resources. The
Supreme Court Family Division will be allocated funding for two court officer
positions. The funding will assist in the process of establishing and filling
these positions to put the department in a position to engage the federal
government on its commitment to appoint an additional federally funded judge.
As of
March 31, 2022, across the department there are 1,655 total PCNs, Position
Control Numbers. Of those, 1,355 are full-time staff, 269 are temporary and 41
are on contracts. These numbers do not include the RCMP.
I am
sure as we got through this, we will get requests to provide information and
anything we provide to one MHA who asked for it during this process, we will
endeavour to provide it to you all.
With
that said, I'm ready to get started with some questions.
CHAIR:
We will start with the
Official Opposition.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Minister and
Chair.
I must
say, first of all, this has always been a valuable experience for me in terms of
the whole process. This is my fourth Estimates and I've been always impressed
with the expertise and the knowledge base from the government officials. I'm
sure that will continue these Estimates.
I also
look forward to what we hear today. I thank you all for your attendance. I also
ask for your patience in case there is any repetition. I'll try my best not to
ask repetitive questions.
Thank
you.
CHAIR:
You can start.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Minister, can you please
outline the department's attrition plan?
J. HOGAN:
I'll pass that over to Mr.
Green.
A. GREEN:
The Department of Justice and
Public Safety's attrition plan has not changed from last year. We still have two
positions that we need to achieve through attrition. We weren't able to achieve
that this year, partially due to executive turnover. In order to achieve
attrition, we would need to have wholesome conversations with our executives. So
we're hopeful that we will achieve those two positions this current fiscal year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
So did you say there were
positions that have been removed this year through attrition? I'm sorry I didn't
catch it.
A. GREEN:
We would have attrition
positions – part of our plan from last year that we would have removed this
year, but they were part of our last year's plan. The timing of it was that they
occurred this year, for the removal.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
How many
retirements have occurred in the last year?
A. GREEN:
There were 48 retirements in
2021-22 and the total retirement cost was approximately $1.6 million.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
With
respect to vacancies, how many vacancies are not filled in the department?
A. GREEN:
As of March 28, there were
121 vacant positions.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Have
there been any positions eliminated? If so, what are they?
A. GREEN:
No positions eliminated
outside of attrition.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Any
layoffs occurred in the last year?
A. GREEN:
There have been no layoffs.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
What
about new hires? Has there been any new hires take place in the last year?
A. GREEN:
There were 89 new hires in 2021-22.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
I'm just
curious about the – I know that the minister spoke about the employees, but how
many contractual and short-term employees are there in the department?
A. GREEN:
So we have 41 contractual positions currently and there are 269 temporary
positions.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
And what about long-term
vacancies? Do you have any in the department? In other words, like positions
that have been vacant more than six months.
A. GREEN:
Of the 121 vacant positions, there would be an allocation of those that would be
vacant greater than six months. But I don't have the exact number of positions
that are greater than six months.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, could you provide that to us?
A. GREEN:
Yes, we can.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Did your
department ever receive any funds from the contingency fund? If so, what was it
for?
A. GREEN:
The Department of Justice and
Public Safety did not avail of any funding from the contingency fund.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
That
concludes the general questions that I have.
So with
respect to subhead 1.1.01, Minister's Office, under Transportation and
Communications, last year there was $58,100 budgeted, but only $15,000 was
needed. Can you discuss how you found these savings?
J. HOGAN:
I'm sure Mr. Green can
comment a little further on this. But, I guess, the change in transportation,
certainly part of it is due to the fact that the current minister is a city MHA
as opposed to a rural one. The last two as far as I know – I don't know how far
back it goes – have been rural MHAs from outside the city, so the travel costs
were obviously reduced by me being here locally.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Subhead
1.2.01, Executive Support, under Salaries, in '21-'22 Salaries were budgeted to
be $1.2 million, but revised to $1.5 million, almost $1.6 million. Can you
please explain this increase?
J. HOGAN:
I'm always going to ask Mr.
Green to correct me if I'm wrong, but I think what that is, is that we did have
some turnover in the Executive in relation to a deputy minister who left, who
was appointed to the provincial bench; an assistant deputy minister who left who
was appointed to the Supreme Court; an assistant deputy minister who retired, so
there were some payouts with regard to when they left the Department of Justice
and Public Safety.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Transportation and Communications, last year there was $41,000 budgeted; only
$14,500 was needed. How were these savings found?
A. GREEN:
The budget here was impacted
by COVID restrictions to travel. So the allocation would assume some executive
travel to FPTs across the country and that didn't occur last year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Subhead
1.2.02, Administrative and Policy Support, under Salaries. In '21-'22, Salaries
were budgeted to be almost $2.1 million, but revised to $1.2 million. Could you
explain the variance? Were the positions left vacant? Also – answer that,
please, first.
J. HOGAN:
You go ahead with Salaries.
A. GREEN:
So the salary allocation here
includes block funding for the expansion of Family Violence Intervention Court,
which didn't happen last year. There's a $400,000 block of funds for that.
There's also the Guns and Gangs federal agreement, it's block funded in this
allocation. We do that to be able to respond to needs rather than put it out in
the department. We did achieve our Guns and Gangs funding, but it was achieved
throughout the department, so we would have moved that funding somewhere else in
the department. But there are no vacancies currently within this staffing group.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
The
budget is being increased to $2,319,700. Explain that increase, please.
A. GREEN:
So the increase again is
related to the annualized impact of salary increases, which was minor in this
division, plus there's expansion of the Drug Treatment Court, there's some extra
federal funding for the Drug Treatment Court. Then we have the
Divorce Act agreement, which is a federal agreement, mostly occurs
in Supreme Court, but we do have a policy analyst position here.
J. HOGAN:
Just to reiterate what Mr.
Green is saying. Obviously, the budget has increased there, but a lot of that,
or a good portion of that, is federal funds that are coming into the province to
support programs that we work with them on, those initiatives.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Employee
Benefits, I note that last year there was $442,500 budgeted but $855,000 spent.
Can you explain the overage?
J. HOGAN:
That's due to greater amount
paid out for departmental workplace health and safety costs in relation to PTSD
issues involving individuals that might work at the RNC or corrections
facilities.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, last year there was a small savings in the Purchased Service
budget but this year more money is being asked for; $513,500 is being estimated.
Can you please outline the variance and what this money is for?
J. HOGAN:
You go ahead, Andrew.
A. GREEN:
So there was some funding allocated from within during the ZBB process; we just
analyzed spending. Part of the federal agreements that I referenced up above in
the salary element have purchased services costing as well. So it would have
been increased for the federal agreement, which is offset by the revenue.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Grants, who receives these grants, and how are the recipients determined?
J. HOGAN:
So the increase in the grant
– which was announced in the budget yesterday – was for the Newfoundland and
Labrador Search and Rescue Association. So that's why it's gone up from $450,000
to $1.35 million. The $450,000 was for …
A. GREEN:
So there's the allocation for grants outside of the $900,000 increase. There are
community constables; this is an annual grant that we provide to community
constable groups for $220,000.
NLSARA
get their annual operating grant of $91,000 out of this grant allocation. NLSARA
also get an annual equipment replacement grant for $100,000, and then internally
we support the National Judicial Institute for $20,000; Uniform Law Conference
of Canada for $12,000; and then we provide the PUB for their motor carrier
costs, which they cannot get from the way they get their funding. The annual
motor carrier and audit for them costs us between $3,500 and $5,000.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
So the $900,000 increase
over last year, just explain on that – elaborate on that, please.
J. HOGAN:
So that was an increase that
was announced – can you hear me?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Yes, I can hear you now.
J. HOGAN:
That was announced yesterday
in the budget; that's a $900,000 increase for the Newfoundland and Labrador
Search and Rescue Association, which was in response to the recommendations from
the ground search and rescue inquiry.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Federal, where is this revenue coming from and how are the amounts
determined? We see that last year more revenue was received than anticipated –
$700,000 more.
A. GREEN:
So, with respect to last year, more revenue was received. That would have been
old-year revenue that didn't come in in time from the previous year, so it was
just attributed here. The federal revenue here is for our federal agreements,
which are Drug Treatment Court, guns and gang, and some divorce act.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
subhead 1.2.03, Legal Information Management, one question on that under
Supplies. Last year supplies went over budget by $38,000. Can you please explain
why?
J. HOGAN:
There was an increase in
legal publications and subscriptions. Increase in cost for those.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Under
subhead 1.2.04, Administrative Support, Capital, Property, Furnishings and
Equipment, I note that the budget is being decreased to $312,500, a cut of over
$500,000. Will this impact the RNC's ability to purchase vehicles and equipment?
J. HOGAN:
My understanding, it's the
end of RNC vehicle replacement plan. This is coming to an end this year. The
plan has been in place and now coming to an end, so the funding is stopped. Not
that the funding has stopped, the plan for the funding ended in last year's
budget.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Fines Administration, 1.3.01, Salaries, last year there was salary savings of
$76,200. Was a position or positions left vacant?
A. GREEN:
Pardon me? What was the
question?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
There was salary savings
of $76,200; was a position or positions left vacant?
A. GREEN:
There were multiple vacancies
in that division. There are administrative positions that do ticket processing
and there are also collector positions. There was turnover in that division.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Provincial, only $310,100 of the budgeted $920,600 was received. Why
is this?
J. HOGAN:
This would have been due to
less third party ticket processing fees collected. Less tickets are being issued
during the COVID-19 pandemic. That's why the number will hopefully, not
hopefully, but it does go up again as a budget for next year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
So less tickets during
COVID?
J. HOGAN:
Fewer tickets, fewer dollars,
yes.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
What's the total amount
of fines outstanding currently?
J. HOGAN:
Total amount outstanding?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Yes.
H. JACOBS:
Forty-seven million dollars.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
I think that's it for
this subhead.
CHAIR:
Okay, thank you.
We will
move on to MHA Lela Evans.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
CHAIR:
Is your light on?
L. EVANS:
Yes, it is.
Can you
hear me?
CHAIR:
You're good.
L. EVANS:
What I'll do is try to cut
down on duplication and repetition. Just going through the general questions:
How many people are currently employed in the department and how many vacancies
are there currently?
A. GREEN:
In the department, we have 1,655 positions, excluding RCMP and Legal Aid, which
wouldn't be inclusive for core department. As of March 28, there were 121
vacancies.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
I hope I
don't repeat some of the questions earlier on. I was having trouble hearing and
I just put my earpiece in a bit late.
When
will we be seeing action to implement any of the recommendations from the ATIPPA
Statutory Review?
J. HOGAN:
That report which was
provided to the Department of Justice and Public Safety by David Orsborn is
under review right now. Obviously, it will take some time; it is a very
comprehensive report. Certainly when we are done having a thorough look at the
recommendations and doing an analysis within the department, we'll bring forward
any proposed legislative amendments to the House when it is ready.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Can we
have an update on the implementation of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous
Women, Girls, and 2SLGBTQQIA+ People National Action Plan that was released June
3, 2021?
K. MARTIN:
Work is ongoing right now with the Office of Women and Gender Equality and the
Office of Indigenous Affairs and Reconciliation to address the calls of justice
of the MMIWG national inquiry. This group participates in the FPT working group
as well. Our intention is to continue to collaborate with this group and the
Indigenous organizations and with the federal government as we move forward with
these initiatives.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
Is it
possible to get an update of that collaboration? Are you actually implementing
anything? Have you identified any of these calls to action that actually falls
under the provincial government? We are actually kind of in the dark when it
comes to what is going on. We haven't heard anything in over a year.
J. HOGAN:
I don't know if we can
provide you with a list of tick boxes of what you're looking for of what has
been done since the recommendations came out. I'm sure you're aware that a lot
of the recommendations that came out are within the federal jurisdiction and not
anything within the control of our department. But as Ms. Martin said, we are
working with them. There are FPT groups that are working towards fulfilling as
many, if not all, of those recommendations as we can. But it is not as simple as
just the provincial government (inaudible).
L. EVANS:
I do understand that it is
complicated and it is layered, as such.
Can we
have an update on the review of the Ground Search and Rescue inquiry report? And
what will the $1 million in additional funding for the search and rescue
associations go towards that's in this budget?
J. HOGAN:
So that money was a grant to
NLSAR. We're going to work with them to determine exactly where that funding is
going to go in relation to the direct recommendations and which ones we are
going to fulfill through that $1 million. There's also $775,000 out of last
year's budget that has been given to NLSAR as well. So it's a sizeable increase
in what they've received over the years.
We look
forward to working with them to implement the recommendations as we move
forward. A big part of that will be work that will be done in Labrador.
L. EVANS:
Yes, and one of the things
that we did hear from the inquiry was local volunteer agencies actually have to
fundraise so they could get the equipment to be able to, actually, do the
searches and also to maintain their own personal safety. So that $1 million will
be a good benefit to a lot of those needs that came out of the search and
rescue.
J. HOGAN:
Some of that funding will be
for equipment. Absolutely.
L. EVANS:
Yeah.
Can we
have an update on the Community Justice Connect initiative? Has the program seen
much uptake?
H. JACOBS:
That program that is housed
in Human Rights has been very successful and, as you know, it's a unique program
using restorative justice. Human Rights is going to continue with that program
this year.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Have you seen a lot of
uptake?
H. JACOBS:
I'm sorry; I don't know the answer to that question.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
H. JACOBS:
But I know when I was talking to the executive director she said it's very
successful, but I don't know the numbers.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Well, that's a good
indication.
Does the
department have any other plans to advance restorative justice programs?
J. HOGAN:
So we do have plans. We were
actually approached by a group from Memorial University probably within the last
couple of months. They approached the Department of Justice and Public Safety,
Minister Dempster's department and Minister Osborne's department as well looking
for some funding in relation to restorative justice program, a three-year plan,
$200,000 a year.
What we
decided to do was give them the full $600,000 right upfront. That was done very
recently. Actually, I believe, I made the telephone call one week ago today to
provide that $600,000 for a restorative justice program.
Part of
the deal was that we will work with them because the Department of Justice has a
role to play in restorative justice. So it's a pretty exciting announcement. I
really look forward to working with that group as we move forward over the next
three years with that block funding.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Following last year's cyberattack will this department be working with OCIO and
other departments on initiatives to better secure the province's IT systems? A
straightforward question.
J. HOGAN:
We work with all departments
in relation to anything that affects the Department of Justice and Public
Safety.
L. EVANS:
Can you provide an update on
the progress of implementing the recommendations for improving the Office of the
Chief Medical Examiner from the 2017 review by Dr. Matthew Bowes?
G. SMITH:
Dr. Bowes, when he completed
his review, made a total of 65 recommendations, 47 which have been fully
completed, 18 have been actioned or will be actioned in the short term. The
themes of the recommendations were legislation, facilities, staffing, records
management, policies and procedures. So, as I said, of the 65, 47 to date have
been fully actioned and completed and 18 are ongoing.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
I don't
know if this question was asked earlier, but how many cases is SIRT currently
investigating?
G. SMITH:
The statistics that the
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner gave us is that they've investigated a
total of 530 cases in the last fiscal year.
J. HOGAN:
Sorry, the question was how
many has SIRT?
L. EVANS:
Yeah.
J. HOGAN:
Yeah, we'll get that.
Sorry, I
know it's hard to hear back there.
L. EVANS:
Yeah, I was –
J. HOGAN:
I don't want you thinking
that was the answer for SIRT.
L. EVANS:
Yeah, I was a bit confused
there, sorry.
D. WOODROW:
SIRT has 12 files this year.
L. EVANS:
Instead of 530 – (inaudible)
her answering so it's expanding her role.
J. HOGAN:
Yeah.
L. EVANS:
Can we have an update on the
progress of the implementation of the Jesso report recommendations?
D. WOODROW:
To date, most of the Jesso
recommendations have been implemented. This year, the major one was we finalized
the transition of the health care services from the Department of Justice and
Public Safety into Eastern Health, with the assistance of the Department of
Health and Community Services.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
My last
general question is what specific measures are being taken to expand the Family
Violence Intervention Court?
K. MARTIN:
We've actually hired a dedicated policy resource to work towards this. We hope
to have our first appearance in 2022.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
I'm just
running out of time, actually. Helen actually asked quite a few questions, so
I'll just stop here.
CHAIR:
All right, the Member's time
is up.
Do you
have any additional questions for this subgroup?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
No, no additional
questions.
CHAIR:
Okay. So I'll ask Clerk to
recall the grouping.
CLERK:
Does Ms. Evans have any more?
CHAIR:
MHA Evans, do you have
additional questions?
L. EVANS:
Yes, actually.
CHAIR:
Okay.
L. EVANS:
Just looking at 1.1.01, what
actual spending on Transportation and Communications was down significantly last
year? While the spending was down, the budget actually increased. Now with COVID
somewhat behind us, will there be more travel done by the department and less
reliance on digital communication?
I know
that we've moved a lot of meetings and a lot of things relating to Justice to
online.
J. HOGAN:
So one of the reasons that
the spending was down was because me being the minister, as a city MHA, as
opposed to a rural MHA, who the last minister was, that's one of the reasons the
spending was down.
The
budget is going higher than that number next year because I do anticipate there
will be more travel as the COVID restrictions have lifted. But, as you can see,
it won't be as high as was budgeted in the previous year.
L. EVANS:
What are the sources of
federal and provincial revenue this year? Why are there variances in the actuals
from last year and the budget amounts for this year in federal revenues?
J. HOGAN:
Can you specify what number
you're looking at?
L. EVANS:
Sorry about that. I skipped
ahead, 1.2.02.
A. GREEN:
If you're asking specifically
about revenue, last year's budget would have been the allocation for guns and
gangs and Divorce Act. What we
actually received was money from previous years' agreements that wasn't received
in the previous years, so that is why it was up. Then this year it is the
expansion of guns and gangs, the expansion of the Drug Treatment Court – both of
those agreements have additional funding. Then there is some
Divorce Act money in there as well.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
1.3.01,
Fines Administration, how much revenue was collected on fines last year?
J. HOGAN:
On fines?
L. EVANS:
Fines.
H. JACOBS:
This year we collected revenue of $7.1 million.
L. EVANS:
That's all of my questions
for this section.
CHAIR:
MHA Conway Ottenheimer.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
One further question that
I forgot to ask about the fine option program. Last year during Estimates, an
official said that development is still ongoing with the fine options program,
but it was delayed because of COVID. Can you just give us an update on the fine
option, please?
H. JACOBS:
Yes, it is the status quo there, just because with the COVID restrictions not
lifted we weren't able to work with the community groups. Hopefully we can more
forward with that program this year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
That's
it.
CHAIR:
MHA Evans, are you finished?
Good.
All
right. I ask the Clerk to recall the subgroup.
CLERK:
Executive and Support
Services, 1.1.01 through 1.3.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 1.1.01 to 1.3.01 carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
All those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 1.1.01 through 1.3.01 carried.
CHAIR:
I ask the Clerk to call the next group.
CLERK:
Legal and Related Services,
2.1.01 through 2.4.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 2.1.01 to 2.4.01 carry?
Go ahead
MHA Conway Ottenheimer.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
Salaries, last year there was salary savings of $157,700: Was a position or
positions left vacant?
A. GREEN:
There was turnover within the division, but there weren't any intentional
vacancies.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Professional Services, can you please review how the budget is being decreased
by $2 million to $3,084,200?
J. HOGAN:
Those are professional
services – a large chunk of that, if not all of it, is for external legal
counsel. So last year was a busy year with regard to having to retain legal
counsel – just some of the matters: large class action lawsuits; large
employment matter in relation to a correctional issue; and some litigation
related to Indigenous matters around rate mitigation. So we don't anticipate
being as busy or as litigious this year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, that's good to
hear.
Thank
you.
Under
Purchased Services, last year Purchased Services went over budget by $22, 300.
Why was this and what was purchased?
A. GREEN:
So with respect to the increased cost, personal services was up in terms of
litigation. So this would have been extra transcription or translation costs.
But nothing was generally purchased in addition.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
Under
Allowances and Assistance, last year $5 million was budgeted; $17.85 million was
spent. This year $5 million is budgeted again. Could you please provide an
explanation of these amounts and who receives this funding?
J. HOGAN:
So this increase was for a
class action lawsuit. The money has been paid into court for this class action
lawsuit and we await final approval from the courts to sign off on what has been
proposed by both sides. So that money wasn't allocated in the budget, as you can
see, in 2021-2022 but, certainly, the litigation moved I would say fairly fast
fairly recently, which is why the money was allocated towards this heading
(inaudible).
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
So what did the class action lawsuit involved? What was that?
J. HOGAN:
So who can give some details?
D. MAHONEY:
The class action involved the
Whitbourne class action lawsuit that was mentioned publicly recently and so the
parties had reached a settlement in principle. It requires approval of the
court. The parties are working with a justice in the Supreme Court to schedule
the matter for an approval hearing in the very near future and, as the minister
said, the money has been paid into court.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
subhead 2.1.02, Sheriff's Office, with respect to Salaries – in 2021-2022, there
were salary savings of $572,400. Again, was a position or positions left vacant?
A. GREEN:
Yes, there were Sheriff's
Office positions and administrative positions
vacant last year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
How many positions were
left vacant, do you know?
A. GREEN:
As of March 28, there were 12 vacancies in the division.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
Transportation and Communications, last year there was $285,000, but only
$170,000 needed. Can you discuss how you found these savings?
K. SEARS:
Yes, these savings were based around travel with regard to circuit court. With
the regulations and health measures with courts being either cancelled or
postponed, much of the travel was not required.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, $243,000 was budgeted, but only $96,500 was needed. Could
you please explain why?
K. SEARS:
Yes, this decrease was largely in part due to jury trials being either cancelled
or postponed or not going ahead.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Property, Furnishings and Equipment it appears there was an unexpected $30,000
expenditure. Can you explain what was purchased?
K. SEARS:
Yes. This was with the new building of the Happy Valley-Goose Bay courthouse.
There was a requirement for CCTV for security purposes.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Federal, $109,900 was budgeted last year but only $25,000 received.
$109,900 is budgeted again for this fiscal. Could you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
So that federal agreement is the
Contraventions Act agreement, which is in Fines Administration, the
Sheriff's Office and the Provincial Court. So that funding is for a position and
then some operating expenditures to support that position. What we received
would have been the time that we would have had a bilingual position filled, but
that position was vacant at the time so we only received a small amount. We
anticipate that we would try to staff that position again.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Support Enforcement, subhead 2.1.03, under Salaries. Salaries are being
increased to $1,006,100. Can you explain the budgeted salary increase?
A. GREEN:
For the Salaries, the Support Enforcement officers recently had a
reclassification award, so we had to adjust our salary plan to support the
increased salaries that they were awarded through reclassification.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, last year Purchased Services went over budget, $98,000 was
spent. Can you please explain why?
H. JACOBS:
Yes, this is due to banking
fees because in that program money comes in and comes out. You'll notice that
we've tried to fix the budget in this year so that it reflects more accurately
that cost.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
So could you just clarify banking fee? What accounts for that over budget?
H. JACOBS:
The payer submits the money to the program and then the program gives the money
to the payee. So we pay a cost for each one of those transactions in the bank
account.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
Under
subhead 2.1.04, Access to Information and Protection of Privacy, under Salaries,
last year Salaries went over budget by $35,000. Can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
The delay of the ATIPPA Review meant that we carried some salaries into the new
year. We didn't have the funding for it because it was too late in the budget
cycle to add some funding for that. So we just incurred increased salaries to
support the conclusion of the ATIPPA Review.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, could you please give an explanation of the variance in this
line item? Last year $42,800 was budgeted, $28,800 spent and now $34,900 is
budgeted.
A. GREEN:
So the intent for the Purchased Services here is for the staff to go out and do
some training with the municipalities. This would include rental of facilities
or AV equipment in order to support that training. Because of COVID, we weren't
able to do the training in person. I think we were able to do some virtual
training.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
Now, I
know that this question was asked but I'm going to ask a related question to the
Access to Information statutory review. It has been completed for some time now.
So can you please give us some estimate as to when you think the changes will be
brought back to the House for discussion?
J. HOGAN:
No, I can't put a timeline on
that. Obviously, we're doing a review. We want to do it properly. You say the
changes that will be brought to the House, I guess, that's the point. I don't
know if any changes will be made or not. That's part of the analysis that we're
doing to see which ones, if necessary, from the report from Mr. Orsborn will be
legislatively changed.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
Under
2.2.01, Criminal Law, Salaries, last year Salaries went over budget by $250,000.
Why was this?
L. STRICKLAND:
I think Mr. Green may be able
to answer this better than I am because it relates to having three extra Crown
attorneys on contract.
A. GREEN:
In our salary plan, we carry
a couple of extra solicitors to be able to meet all of our Jordan requirements
in the criminal law division.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
With
respect to Jordan, do we have any cases before the court now with respect to
Jordan?
J. HOGAN:
Sorry, what was the question?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
With respect to the
Jordan case, do we have any delays as a result of Jordan?
L. STRICKLAND:
I didn't hear the question,
I'm sorry.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
With respect to the
Jordan case, do we have any cases that are before the court in relation to a
delay?
L. STRICKLAND:
There is only one outstanding
Jordan application filed in a criminal case in the province right now and that
is being litigated.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay. Thank you.
CHAIR:
MHA Evans.
L. EVANS:
2.1.01, Civil Law, actual
spending on Salaries was lower than expected last year, why was this?
A. GREEN:
So that was just general
turnover within the division and delays in recruitment.
L. EVANS:
Delays in recruitment, was it
because of vacancies that couldn't be filled?
A. GREEN:
All the positions are
currently filled; it's just the timing of filling them.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
Spending
on Employee Benefits was a bit higher than expected last year. What was the
reason for this?
A. GREEN:
The Employee Benefits here
would be Law Society fees for all the solicitors, and then we had some articling
students that we had to pay their bar course fees. That was the increased
expenditure.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
2.1.02,
Sheriff's Office, the department has linked the Sheriff's Office inability to
provide financial statements to the Auditor General in part due to outdated
accounting processes. Is there any talk about updating these? If so, how will
they be changed?
K. SEARS:
This is a priority for the
Office of the High Sheriff. We recently hired a new manager for the accounting
section with further interviews going this week. The financials have been
provided and have been returned for revision. With regard to the outdated
processes, it's something that can certainly be looked in to.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
2.1.03,
Support Enforcement, there's a projected increase in Salaries this year. Are
there any new positions being created? If so, what's their function?
A. GREEN:
There are no new positions.
This was a reclassification for the existing staff. So it was to increase their
salaries to match what the reclassification award was.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Thank you.
2.1.04,
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy, spending on Employee Benefits
was lower than anticipated last year, and in the budget, this item is down
compared to last year. What accounts for these variances?
A. GREEN:
So the Employee Benefits here
is for membership fees for all ATIPP coordinators in the government in the
International Association of Privacy Professionals. I think there were some
vacancies within some ATIPP positions.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Thank you.
2.2.01,
Criminal Law, there's an increase in the Supplies budget this year. What
accounts for this increase?
J. HOGAN:
Can you say that again,
please?
L. EVANS:
2.2.01, Criminal Law, there's
an increase in the Supplies budget this year. I was just wondering what accounts
for the increase?
A. GREEN:
So that would have been a
zero-based budgeting spending analysis. We increased the Supplies budget to
match what we anticipated expenditures will be for this year. I think they're
going to buy some redaction software for the Crown attorneys to do disclosure.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Thank you.
Spending
on Professional Services came in over budget last year and this year's budget
shows an increase of about $10,000, over last year's budget. Why is this the
case? Why the increase?
L. STRICKLAND:
The increase from last year –
for us, Professional Services relates to retaining external counsel when there
are conflicts of interest; for instance, a situation that did arise where a
Crown attorney is the complainant in an uttering threats charge. We hire
external counsel. It's a matter of happenstance that we had an increased
expenditure and we expect it to go back to historical norms.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
2.3.01,
Legal Aid: Has there been any discussion about cutting grants to Legal Aid in
the years to come?
J. HOGAN:
No.
L. EVANS:
I'm glad to see that.
2.3.03,
Other Inquiries: Could we have an update on the work of the Commission of
Inquiry into the Treatment, Experiences and Outcomes of Innu in the Child
Protection System?
J. HOGAN:
Because the same
commissioner, Igloliorte, was doing the ground search and rescue inquiry, and is
also participating as one of the three commissioners, as you know, for this
inquiry into the custody of Innu children, we have been working with them very
closely a lot over the last couple of months to finalize. There has been a lot
of work gone into the terms of reference and the rules of procedure in relation
to this upcoming inquiry.
We work
very closely with Innu council. The deputy minister has taken on a heavy load
since he has been here, and he hasn't been here for very long. We're very, very,
very close. We couldn't be closer to announcing the terms of reference. Legal
counsel has been hired by the commissioners and they are working together
already, so I anticipate an announcement on the actual timeline of that to be
very, very soon.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
I'm
struggling – I left my reading glasses, so I am just trying not to lose focus
here.
I think
you partially answered my next question. There is a significant decrease in the
annual salary expenses over last year – I'm still in Other Inquiries, actually –
but this year there is a budget of $866,000 under this heading. Will there be
any carryover in the staff between the ground search and rescue and the Inquiry
into the Treatment, Experiences and Outcomes of Innu in the Child Protection
System?
D. MAHONEY:
The staffing structure for the ground search and rescue inquiry will be
different than the Innu inquiry. We have already started preparations for the
staffing of the Innu inquiry, but there has been a gap between the staffing of
the ground search and rescue because their work is now completed and we're just
getting ready to staff up the Innu inquiry. So there will be differences in the
staffing structure and we generally expect that there will be more staffing
required for the Innu inquiry than we had for the ground search inquiry.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Just as
an aside, the way that the ground search and rescue inquiry was carried out was
very respectful of the Indigenous people who were greatly impacted but the
Burton Winters tragedy. If you could see more of that, more respect in the
communication and supports, it would be greatly appreciated. I think it was one
of the reasons why the ground search and rescue inquiry was so successful, from
a Labrador perspective. So thank you for that.
And I
think it had a lot to do with the staff and the support that was actually there.
J. HOGAN:
I will just comment. Thanks
for that comment, and that issue has been addressed in the terms of Reference,
and obviously Commissioner Igloliorte – it was credit to him for doing that
properly and respectfully and I'm sure he will continue to do that on the Innu
inquiry as well.
L. EVANS:
And his support with Budden
was quite an asset as well.
Continuing on in Other Inquiries, the variances in the actual and budgeted
figures under Operating Accounts – does this have anything to do with the
inquiries finishing up and others, which would be the Innu inquiry, just getting
started, or does it have to do with lower expenses as a result of COVID?
J. HOGAN:
No, I think your first option
was the right one. It just had to do with the transition from one finishing up
and moving into the next one.
L. EVANS:
Section 2.3.04, Office of the
Chief Medical Examiner: Both the actual expenditures and those budgeted for this
year under Salaries are lower than the budget from last year. Why is this?
A. GREEN:
We would have had salary savings for the additional medical examiner position,
which was vacant last year.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Just
looking at – why is there a slight increase in the budget for Professional
Services this year, under that section?
A. GREEN:
This would be a zero-based budget spending analysis, so we would have seen an
uptick in trend in professional services spending, which is why we would have
increased the budget.
L. EVANS:
Why are we expecting no
federal revenue this year? In this year's budget, we're not expecting any
federal revenue under that section, under the chief medical –
A. GREEN:
The federal revenue agreements that were with the Office of Chief Medical
Examiner have expired. I know the staff are working on additional help from the
federal government, but there wasn't any finalized by the time the budget was
ready.
CHAIR:
MHA Conway Ottenheimer,
please.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
2.2.01, Criminal Law, under Transportation and Communications, last year there
was $427,500 budgeted for T and C but only $295,000 needed. Can you discuss how
you found these savings?
L. STRICKLAND:
Basically, there were fewer
court circuits because of Public Health measures that eliminated the ability to
conduct in-person hearings. As well, annually, we send Crown attorneys for
further education at what is called the Ontario crown school. Again, because of
Public Health measures we did not send anyone last year. So those were the
savings.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
2.3.01, Legal Aid, how many lawyers are now practising at Legal Aid?
A. GREEN:
So there would be
approximately 51 lawyers.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
The
Member for Torngat Mountains did touch on this question, but I'm going to ask as
well. With respect to the Greene report, they had recommended that the operating
grant to Legal Aid be reduced by 2 per cent. Has your department done any
analysis or has Legal Aid completed any analysis on what impact that this would
have on services?
J. HOGAN:
The answer to her was that we
don't have any plan to cut any money right now.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
No plans to cut, okay.
Good, I
just wanted to confirm.
J. HOGAN:
I should say right now that
there is no plan to cut money to Legal Aid.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, good. That's good
to hear.
Thank
you.
Under
2.3.03, Other Inquires – I know this has been, as well, touched upon, but I
would like to ask a general question about this. If you could please speak
generally about the expenses listed here for Other Inquires. I'm aware that the
amount spent in any year largely depends on the timing and the needs of an
inquiry. But how were the amounts for this upcoming year actually calculated?
Specifically I'm wondering about the variance, for example, in Salaries,
Transportation and Communications, Professional Services and Purchased Services.
J. HOGAN:
The variance is that the last
budget would have been the end of the ground search and rescue inquiry, and now
the budget for this year is for the Innu inquiry. This is an estimate based on,
I guess, a historical look on what inquires cost and we try to figure out how
long this one is going to go for compared to ones that we've seen in the past
and the cost in the past. This $4 million for this budget will go to standard
things for an inquiry: legal fees, travel in Labrador for this one and things
like that. Nothing out of the ordinary, just a comparison to previous inquiries.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
2.3.04, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, I know that the Member for Torngat
Mountains had asked about the Bowes inquiry. I just wanted to clarify; last year
when I asked, we were told that 50 out of the 65 recommendations of the Bowes
inquiry were implemented. Can I get an update on the other 15 outstanding
recommendations?
G. SMITH:
So there are still a number that have been actioned and are ongoing, and some
that will be actioned – I don't have the specific count of which specific
recommendations have been completed. However, there were some, as I indicated
earlier, broad headings in terms of the recommendations, and some would require
more time in terms of records management and some of the recommendations around
changes in facilities. So those are still ongoing.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Supplies, last year Supplies went over budget by $9,700. Can you please explain
why?
A. GREEN:
So that was increased supplies for PPE equipment for COVID.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, last year Purchased Services went over budget spending
$500,000. Can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
In the Purchased Services here, we would have lab expenditures, so there was an
increase in lab expenditures. We have transportation of human remains
expenditures, which we can't tell what we're going to spend there. It's not
something we can anticipate; it just happens. So they would have been the two
cost drivers in Purchased Services.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you Andrew.
Also
now, under subhead 2.3.05, Human Rights, Salaries, the salary budget is being
decreased to $703,600. Why is that?
A. GREEN:
There was a federally funded position last year that the federal agreement is
finalized, so the salary expense would not be offset by the revenue.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
What was
that position, exactly?
A. GREEN:
Pardon me?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
What was that position?
A. GREEN:
The position? It was a policy analyst, I believe, that was helping with
Community Justice Connect and anti-racism.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
J. HOGAN:
That's right.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, the budget for Purchased Services is being reduced to
$6,000. Can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
That would have been the operating expenditures as part of the federal
agreement.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
J. HOGAN:
Anti-racism.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Federal, could you please explain where exactly this federal revenue
comes from?
J. HOGAN:
The same issue as the
federal; it is the anti-racism position.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
The same. Okay, thank
you.
Under
2.3.06, Office of the Public Trustee, Salaries, this year the salary budget is
being increased to $758,000. Are there extra positions being added?
A. GREEN:
No, there are no new positions. This is the full-year impact of annualized
salary increases plus, as you know, which I have explained in previous years how
we apply attrition, we allocate it proportionally across the department. So this
is kind of funding back some of the attrition block that we took in previous
years.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Provincial, could you explain how an extra $200,000 was collected last
year?
A. GREEN:
We get expenditures for undistributable estates that come into the Consolidated
Revenue Fund. We also have fees to manage estates that come in. So it was just
an increase in undistributable estates.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
subhead 2.4.01, Legislative Counsel, Salaries, there is a slight salary
increase. Is this just annual step increases? What is it exactly?
A. GREEN:
It would be similar to the Public Trustee response. It was the annualized impact
of salary increase plus bringing back some of that attrition money we took over
the years, the little blocks.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
That
completes my questions for that heading.
CHAIR:
MHA Evans.
L. EVANS:
No, mine are complete, too.
CHAIR:
You're finished?
J. HOGAN:
Yes, she said she is done.
CHAIR:
I ask the Clerk to recall.
CLERK:
Legal and Related Services,
2.1.01 to 2.4.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 2.1.01 to 2.4.01 carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 2.1.01 through 2.4.01 carried.
CHAIR:
I ask the Clerk to call the
next group.
CLERK:
The Law Courts, 3.1.01 to
3.2.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
3.1.01 to 3.2.01 inclusive.
MHA
Conway Ottenheimer.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
this heading, I just have some general questions. I know that the minister did
speak in general about the Family Violence Intervention Courts, but last year in
Estimates, officials talked about hiring a new policy analyst. What work has
this analyst completed, and what's the timeline for a Central Family Violence
Intervention Court?
K. MARTIN:
The policy analyst has been
hired and they are working on an implementation plan for the court to expand to
Central Newfoundland, and we expect to see that in place in 2022.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
With
respect to the Drug Treatment Courts – I think that you did speak about this,
but I'm going to ask again. I apologize for any repetition. Could you please
provide an update on the Drug Treatment Court?
K. MARTIN:
The Drug Treatment Court, we
are working with our federal counterparts to expand this court outside of St.
John's. We are hoping that that will be completed this year as well.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, that's good news.
Thank
you.
The
Mental Health Court, can you give an update on the number of people who are
participating in the program, in the court, and is there a desire to expand this
court to other geographical areas?
K. MARTIN:
In '21-'22, we had 22
individuals who completed the programming of the Mental Health Court, and 10 who
were pending or participating in the court. We have not looked at any expansion
with that court as of right now.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Online
versus in-person services: I am curious about if you could give an overview of
which court services are now online versus in-person.
S. FOSS:
The Supreme Court, mostly due
to the COVID-19 pandemic, did reach out to its counterparts across the country
and we do have some working groups that are ongoing since, I guess, the middle
of the pandemic to try to enhance the online services.
For the
Supreme Court specifically here, we do have the eFiling for the probate. We have
been working on updating our website. We will be rolling out a new website over
the next several months to make it a little easier for self-represented
litigants, specifically, make the information a little more accessible. And I
think that's all on that.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
subhead 3.1.01, Supreme Court, Salaries, last year there was a salary savings of
$405,000. This year it's being increased to $6,706,600. Could you please outline
why?
J. HOGAN:
One of the reasons is there
will be two new positions in relation for the Unified Family Court. So as you
know, we have a bill before the House right now to amend the
Judicature Act to allow the federal government to provide three new
UFC judges. The plan is to roll this out one at a time. The first one we've been
working with the Supreme Court on, it will need two additional staff resources
to assist with the judge. That's why there's an increase there for two new
positions at the Supreme Court.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Purchased Services, last year Purchased Services went over budget by $26,000.
Why was this?
A. GREEN:
So Purchased Services went
over last year due to jury trial expenditures for audiovisual at the School for
the Deaf. We had to rent some audiovisual equipment.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Revenue - Federal, could you please explain how $606,000 was collected last year
and explain where the $772,400 will come from? I'm just curious about the
variance there.
A. GREEN:
So the revenue in Supreme
Court is two federal agreements. There's a Family Justice Services agreement,
which make up about half of the revenue. The other additional half is the
Divorce Act funding. So the $606,000 would have been the Family
Justice Services and then some Divorce Act
funding. Then the increase would have been the annualization of the increase
in that Divorce Act agreement.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
3.2.01, Provincial Court, Salaries, last year there was salary savings of
$353,800. Why was this?
A. GREEN:
So there were some vacancies
within the Provincial Court.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
How many
vacancies were there?
A. GREEN:
As of March 28, there were
seven vacant positions.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
Purchased Services – this is my last question for this heading – can you please
provide some detail on the Purchased Services budget? Last year, there was
$405,800 budgeted and $380,000 spent. This year $421,000 budgeted.
A. GREEN:
So the Purchased Services
budget here, we would have done an historical spending analysis and we probably
would have added some funding based on five-year averages and what we saw there.
There were some drops in spending due to the pandemic.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
That
completes my questions.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
MHA
Evans.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
3.1.01,
Supreme Court, spending on Supplies and Property, Furnishings and Equipment was
lower than expected last year. Why was this?
OFFICIAL:
Supplies?
L. EVANS:
Yeah, Supplies and Property,
Furnishings and Equipment.
A. GREEN:
So are you asking for the reduction in Supplies this year?
L. EVANS:
Yes.
A. GREEN:
Yeah. So that would have been Divorce Act
funding supplies that we weren't able to fully achieve.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
3.2.01,
Provincial Court, could we have an update on how the government plans to handle
the issues with judges' salaries? Will we be expecting a motion in the House
soon, as per the recommendations of Justice Boone?
J. HOGAN:
So the resolution was read in
the House yesterday.
L. EVANS:
Yeah, okay.
J. HOGAN:
You prepared your questions
before yesterday, didn't you?
L. EVANS:
Yeah, yeah, I'm sorry, I just
– I'm having trouble focusing. On our break, I will be getting my glasses.
What
region will be serviced by the new travelling judge position and what areas are
in highest demand for such a service?
H. JACOBS:
All the provincial courts are working well with court dates available for
September to October, but Grand Falls-Windsor is having scheduling problems so
the judge, originally, I think, will be going there, but we'll have to consult
with the chief judge.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
There's
an increase in the budget for this year for Supplies. Why is this?
A. GREEN:
So this would have been a zero-based budgeting spending analysis, looking at
historical spending and then trying to allocate our budget to what the
historical spending would have been.
L. EVANS:
Okay. Thank you.
The
budget for this years Property, Furnishings and Equipment has increased, what
new expenses are anticipated?
A. GREEN:
So there aren't any generally new expenditures anticipated, it's just there
are10 court locations that they have lots of office equipment, chairs, et
cetera. It's a public-facing building so it's the general replenishment of some
of that equipment and we try to match it to our spending analysis.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
I'm
finished with my questions for this section.
CHAIR:
All right.
MHA
Conway Ottenheimer?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Nothing else, thank you.
CHAIR:
All right.
So I'll
ask the Clerk to recall the grouping.
CLERK:
Law Courts, 3.1.01 through
3.2.01 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 3.1.01 to 3.2.01 carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 3.1.01 through 3.2.01 carried.
CHAIR:
Before we move into Public
Protection, Fire and Emergency Services, we're going to take a 10-minute break.
It is now 10:18, so we will come back at 10:28.
Recess
CHAIR:
I'm going to ask the Clerk to
call the next grouping.
CLERK (Beazley):
Public Protection, 4.1.01 to
4.2.02 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 4.1.01 to 4.2.02 carry?
MHA
Conway Ottenheimer.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Chair.
I'm just
going to ask a general question about, first of all, the RNC replacement plan
for vehicles. Minister, you said the plan to replace the vehicles has ended. Can
you please provide some commentary on the current condition of the fleet? Then,
I have a couple of other subquestions about that.
K. HARDING:
Currently, the RNC has 152
fleet.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Are there standards for
the fleet in terms of how long a vehicle is used before replacement?
K. HARDING:
We do an analysis on the
mileage of each fleet and the operating expenses incurred for each vehicle.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Can you
comment on the current condition of the fleet? Does the fleet now meet the
standards?
K. HARDING:
With the replacement plan,
the RNC fleet is in good condition. Approximately 77 per cent of our fleet has
less than 200,000 kilometres.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
For
example, computers in the vehicles and so forth, are there assets that are going
to be replaced this year?
K. HARDING:
In July of 2021, we purchased
20 new mobile data terminal computers for the vehicles.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Recently
I heard a story. I was contacted about two officers who were left without their
communication system functioning while on duty.
Can you
provide any commentary about this? What's being done to ensure that officers are
not left without communications in terms of the risk to officers, for example?
K. HARDING:
We do have an ongoing
operational file regarding our radio system. The RNC does have a business
continuity plan in place in the event that the radio system fails in the cars.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Can you
provide any commentary about that situation I'm referring to? Are you aware of
that, about when the communication system actually didn't function properly
while they were on duty?
K. HARDING:
I can't comment on that
particular incident, no.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
How many
officers are eligible for retirement?
K. HARDING:
Currently, we have 29 police
officers eligible to retire.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
With respect to recruits,
how many new recruits are available to replace them?
K. HARDING:
Currently, we're going
through the recruiting process. We are looking at a class size of anywhere
between 10 and 15.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Just in terms of the
recruitment, are there any plans to have any kind of training here in the
province or will it be outside of Newfoundland and Labrador?
K. HARDING:
Once the recruitment class is
selected, they will attend Atlantic Police Academy in PEI. When they return from
the Atlantic Police Academy, they will do a four- to six-week course here
completing online or in-service training.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
subhead 4.1.01, under Salaries, can the minister please give an overview of how
many employees are with the RNC? I don't know if this was answered before and I
apologize if I am repeating the question.
K. HARDING:
Currently, we have 397 police
officers and we have 93 civilian positions filled.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
The
salary line item had a saving of $1.57 million. Why is that?
K. HARDING:
That was due to turnover in
staff. We currently have 22 vacant positions with civilians and six vacant
police positions.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Transportation and
Communications: Can you please explain the variance in this line item? There was
a savings of $248,600 found last year.
K. HARDING:
This was due to our members
not going away on training due to COVID restrictions.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Under
Supplies, last year $1,825,200 was budgeted and $1,455,000 was spent; this year,
$1,790,400 was budgeted. Can you please provide some commentary on this variance
here?
A. GREEN:
The Supplies budget went down last year due to reduced uniform requirements. It
was brought down a little bit from budget to budget, based on zero-based
spending analysis.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Under
Revenue - Federal, last year $450,400 of the anticipated $629,000 was collected.
Can you explain this, please?
A. GREEN:
So the revenue here is for the federal revenue in the budget last year, there
was a carry-over revenue that we didn't close off for the Combined Forces
Special unit that was in the budget. It shouldn't have been for a number of
years, so we actually corrected it; it came down a little bit. And then the
revenue we actually collected was for the drug-impaired driving agreement.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Under
Revenue - Provincial, where does this revenue come from? Could you please
outline how the extra was obtained last year? I think $557,800 was received.
K. HARDING:
Revenue comes from criminal records screening certificates, background checks
and fingerprinting services.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
4.1.02, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, under Transportation and Communications,
I know it's only $1,100 but I'm just curious where it was spent.
S. SIMMONS:
That was spent for the analyst – myself – to attend Innu round-table meetings
that occurred in Halifax as part of the Justice and Policing sub-committee.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Professional Services, could you please outline how the amount budgeted for the
RCMP compares to the amount asked for by the RCMP?
J. HOGAN:
So I think the question was
the increase – what's the comparison to what was asked for by the RCMP?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Right.
J. HOGAN:
So we did meet with the RCMP,
the former commanding officer, DeAnna Hill with regard to budget issues – I
shouldn't say budget issues, but the budget for the RCMP, obviously, everyone
knows, we've got questions in the House about it and I got letters from
municipalities throughout the province on it, there hasn't been an increase in a
long time.
So happy
yesterday to hear the Minister of Finance say that there's an increase in the
budget of about $17 million, which is obviously a very, very large increase over
last year's budget.
But in
terms of the conversations with the RCMP, you know, there was a lot of back and
forth and a lot of discussions about where money was needed and where we could
allocate funds. But, of course, at the end of the day, the RCMP, same with the
RNC, are going to make operational decisions that the Department of Justice is
not going to have a say in.
So it's
a little bit vague to say what was asked for in terms of the direct request from
the RCMP. But we're happy to work with them. We met with them yesterday as well
and they're very pleased with the large increase in the budget.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
That's good to hear.
Thank you.
Revenue
- Federal, can you please explain what program the federal revenue is for and
what accounts for the increase to $239,600 in the revenue for this year?
A. GREEN:
That is drug-impaired driving
revenue and it's increased due to just these general increases of that
agreement. It has escalating increases in it.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
RNC Public Complaints Commission, 4.1.03, Professional Services went over budget
last year, $333,500 was spent, why was this?
J. HOGAN:
There were external legal
fees because we had to retain a new contractual adjudicator at a higher rate of
pay.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
How many
complaints does the RNC Public Complaints Commission receive on average each
year? How many did we actually receive last year?
D. WOODROW:
There were 49 last year and
49 this year as well.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Consistent isn't it.
Under
Serious Incident Response Team, 4.1.04, I know that this was asked by the Member
for Torngat Mountains, I believe there are 12 files, but I'm just curious, so
the Salaries last year, there was a salary savings of $33,000. Was a position
vacant for a period of time?
A. GREEN:
Yes, for SIRT there was a vacancy. That office is fully staffed, fully
operational right now.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
CHAIR:
You're time is expired.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
CHAIR:
MHA Evans.
L. EVANS:
Yes, thank you.
4.1.01,
Royal Newfoundland Constabulary, are there any plans to implement cultural
sensitivity training for staff at the RNC?
K. HARDING:
I can't answer that question.
L. EVANS:
You don't have the
information or you can't answer it?
J. HOGAN:
(Inaudible) to the financials
here, which is what Ms. Harding is here to speak about. A policy question, I
guess, would be better directed to the chief of police, who is unfortunately not
here today. It's certainly something we can chat about outside of the Estimates
questions.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Spending
on Professional Services and Purchased Services, two lines, was over budget last
year. The budget for both these items is also increased again in this year's
budget. What was the reason for this increase?
K. HARDING:
The reason for the increase
was the external legal requirements for operational files.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
4.1.02,
Royal Canadian Mounted Police, we already discussed the increase in Professional
Services, but what will these increases get us in terms of services? Also, what
was the number of new hires coming out of this increase?
S. SIMMONS:
The minister has established provincial policing priorities with the RCMP. So we
have outlined that rural policing should be a priority as well as collaboration
with Indigenous communities and traffic services. We are currently working with
the RCMP in terms of their exact needs with regard to a staffing complement.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
Do you
know how many new hires will come and what types of positions they will be?
S. SIMMONS:
Sorry, can you repeat the question?
L. EVANS:
Out of the increase, how many
new hires will there be and what types of positions would the new hires be in?
S. SIMMONS:
We are currently still working through that process with the RCMP to determine
their exact needs.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
J. HOGAN:
Just to add, the arrangement
with the federal government, there is a maximum amount of RCMP officers that can
be hired, so we do have to work within the framework agreement that we had with
the federal government.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
4.1.04,
Serious Incident Response Team, the actual spending on Supplies was up last year
but it is lower than expected in the Professional Services and Property,
Furnishings and Equipment. What accounts for these variances?
A. GREEN:
The variances reflected in this office would have been – all of them would have
been an office that wasn't fully operational. But now we are expecting the
budget to match full operations.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
This
year's budget for Purchased Services is up but the one for Property, Furnishings
and Equipment is lower. Why are these budget numbers being adjusted? I think you
may have answered my question.
A. GREEN:
The Property, Furnishing and Equipment, there would have been some upfront
expenditures that you would see, some of that $17,000 would have occurred, so
then we just kind of thought that those were one time so we brought the budget
down a little bit.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
4.2.01,
Adult Corrections, how much money does the provincial government receive from
the federal government for housing of federal prisoners in our facilities?
D. WOODROW:
It was $315 under the
Exchange of Service Agreement for last year, but for this upcoming year, it will
be $415 per inmate.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
Spending
on Salaries went over budget last year and there's a budget increase for this
item this year. What accounts for these figures?
D. CHAFE:
These expenses are in
relation to overtime and directly related to COVID because a position, when
someone's off, has to be backfilled.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
At the
HMP, there's supposed to be review done every time there's an incident. How many
investigations were completed last year, and will the results for these
investigations be made public?
J. HOGAN:
Could repeat the question,
and I guess be a little more specific about what you mean by incident?
L. EVANS:
According to my findings,
there is supposed to be a review done every time that there's an incident at Her
Majesty's Penitentiary – basically one involving violence. Therefore, how many
investigations were completed last year and, with these investigations, will
their findings be made public?
D. CHAFE:
Any use-of-force incident is
reviewed on a daily basis, and then we try to use lessons learned. I don't have
that number here today, though.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
Do the
investigations involving violence be made available to the public?
D. CHAFE:
Not really, no. Unless it's
of a serious nature.
L. EVANS:
With regard to the Correction
Centre for Women in Clarenville, what supports are currently in place for women
who are released from custody but do not have financial means to return home?
D. CHAFE:
We work with Stella Burry,
and also we are required to return inmates back to their home community to which
they were arrested.
L. EVANS:
Just a further question to
that. If they don't have the means to be able to support themselves in their
home community, like in terms of an apartment or accommodations, are there any
resources made available to help them?
D. CHAFE:
Yeah, we do a release plan
with our classification officer. We make all those connections upon release, so
they have somewhere to go.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
Are
there any plans this year to improve the cultural supports for Indigenous
inmates on the island, especially those who are far from home and in a foreign
cultural environment?
D. CHAFE:
We are expanding the LCC in Labrador, which will be able to accommodate females,
which will be a much-needed improvement. As well, we are working with our staff
to do Indigenous training that is going to happen annually.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
The
budget for Employee Benefits has increased; why is this so?
A. GREEN:
So that's an increase as part of the FILU agreement, or Family Information
Liaison Units, and that's for the Victim Services staff to avail of culturally
sensitive training.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
The
actual expenditures for Supplies, Professional Services, Property, Furnishings
and Equipment were over budget last year. Why was this the case?
D. CHAFE:
That would be in relation to safety equipment and any supplies for COVID.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
Why has
the budget increased for Professional Services, from last year?
A. GREEN:
So in this Adult Corrections allocation, there's a restatement of health
expenditures, which would occur in the Professional Services line, but the
middle column for the revised is what our expenditures were, so that wasn't
restated. We've moved money out into the Department of Health or Eastern
Regional Health Authority for health expenditures.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
What
accounts for the variation in the figures for the federal revenue?
D. CHAFE:
We have an Exchange of Service Agreement with the federal government, and that
rate is recalculated annually. This year it's basically based on the total
expenses divided by the average inmate count. So because our count was a little
lower, we actually have an increase in rate of $100 per bed-night for federal
inmates.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
4.2.02,
Youth Secure Custody: Why was the spending on Salaries lower than expected last
year?
J. HOGAN:
Where were the Salaries –
what?
L. EVANS:
Sorry, why was the spending
on Salaries lower than expected?
A. GREEN:
There were some vacant positions that were held vacant because there wasn't the
number of residents that required the positions be filled at the time.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Under 4.1.04,
Professional Services, (inaudible) when you look at last year's revised of
$70,000 saved, this year budgeted (inaudible).
J. HOGAN:
I think that's just in
anticipation of increased legal services – anticipation of increased legal fees.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
4.2.01, Adult Corrections, Transportation and Communications, last year there
was savings of $109,400 and despite saving money, the line item is increasing
this year. Can you please provide some detail?
D. CHAFE:
Basically the budget has
increased because of a spend analysis that was conducted to better fit what was
actually needed. We were over what was budgeted last year, due to backfilling.
So we don't think that will continue once COVID goes away.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
I have
question about the inmate disciplinary process. We know that there was reporting
in March about the disciplinary process within Provincial Courts, and actually
in a news article the minister indicated that a new independent oversight
process would replace what was referred to a kangaroo court. Can you just give
us an update on that, provide some information? Is there going to be a new
process and, if so, when will it be introduced?
D. WOODROW:
We're currently working on
regulations to finalize that process, and expect to have them this fiscal.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Do you
have any further information about what it will look like?
D. WOODROW:
Not that we're prepared to
discuss. It's not been finalized at this point.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
the Bail Supervision Program – I know that under the
Strategic Plan 2020-23 for Justice, by March 31, 2021, the
department should have implemented the Bail Supervision Program. Then when we
look at the annual report in 2020-21, the deadline has been pushed so that the
Bail Supervision Program would be operationalized by March 31, 2022. Can we be
given an update on the progress towards the Bail Supervision Program, please?
D. WOODROW:
Again, this year we were impacted by the limitations of the court because the
probation officers have to have time in the lock-up to meet with people who are
there, to work with them to come up with a bail supervision plan. So because we
weren't able to do that, we have to push forward now and see where we're going
with our increased operations due to COVID being kind of at an end from that
perspective.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
The
electronic monitoring pilot program: I understand last year that there were
seven units in use. Can you give us an update? How many units do we have in the
province? How many are in use?
D. WOODROW:
Currently, we have approximately 20 or 21 people who are availing of the
electronic monitoring program. We have capacity from 30 up to 60 so that we can
increase the usage of that. I am looking forward to having that increase this
year. There have been some technology updates that kind of match the program
with what's available, so we should see some increase in that use this year.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
On the
theme of restorative justice initiatives and the program, the minister earlier
referred to a MUN group that approached him and there is a three-year plan. I
think it was mentioned $600,000 involved in this and that sounds very
encouraging. I am just wondering, can you tell us the name of this group and
elaborate a little bit further on it, please?
J. HOGAN:
I'm asking my deputies. I
don't want to say the person's name wrong. It is Dr. Dorothy Vaandering at
Memorial University.
Hansard,
good luck. Google that and spell it right.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Do we have any ideas to
when we're going to see that or do you have any time frame?
J. HOGAN:
Like I said, she was only
made aware of the funding grant one week ago today, so we'll get working with
her right away. She is quite excited.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Sounds good. Do we know
what the program is going to look like? Do you have any idea or is it pretty
general at this point.
J. HOGAN:
Pretty general.
D. MAHONEY:
We have an accountability agreement with Memorial University and Dr. Vaandering
for the oversight of the program. There will be a steering committee and it will
be represented through the Department of Justice and Public Safety. The
Department of Education will have senior representatives on that steering
committee to ensure that there is a close connection between the funding that
has been provided, the oversight of the program and also the lessons learned and
the knowledge transfer back into government.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Also,
now with respect to programming with the HMP and replacement of HMP – can you
provide an update on the replacement of HMP?
J. HOGAN:
Yes, so that's in the
Department of Transportation and Infrastructure. They're working on it. The
status of it has been made public in terms of sending out the request for
qualification I think? Or are we doing a request for tenders? I'm not quite sure
where it is with that.
Does
anyone …?
D. WOODROW:
Yes, just to pick up on what the minister was saying, there was a request for
qualification. We're currently working through the process with one bidder. It's
a consultation process that goes back and forth while the technical requirements
for the prison are established. We'll be expecting a bid at the end of that
process.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
While a
new facility is needed – it's clear, it's obvious we need increased and new
program services in our correctional facilities – are you exploring any new
programs that can be implemented within HMP while we're waiting for the
replacement facility?
J. HOGAN:
So just to be clear on the
question, is it what programs that are now at HMP as opposed to new programs
that can be –
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Can be –
J. HOGAN:
The new facility is obviously
going to be built with that in mind to provide for those programs, where I'm
sure those things weren't in mind 150 years ago when HMP was built. So there is
a plan, of course, when it is built, to make space for those programs. But is
the question what are the programs now at HMP?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Well, I'm just curious if
there are going to be any new programs. In the interim, until we actually see
the new facility up and running, what is being done at the current HMP in terms
of trying to have more programming for the inmates that are currently there?
J. HOGAN:
I'm sure you can speak to the
current programs.
D. CHAFE:
We've got some great partnerships with Stella Burry, John Howard Society and the
Canadian Mental Health Association. Ironically, through COVID we've been doing
more with video because we couldn't move as much, and so even video visits have
been improved. I think we're doing everything we can with the facility we have,
and I'm sure that those stakeholders will give input on a new facility and
perhaps expand what they do.
J. HOGAN:
Recently, we had discussions
with Stella Burry and the John Howard Society, and provided a grant to each of
them in the amount of $200,000 to help with ongoing work that they have in the
province.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Now, the
question was raised by the Member for Torngat Mountains about the Clarenville
women's correctional facility. I've also met with a number of advocates and
organizations in this province. A number of them have talked about the women's
correctional facility in Clarenville and reported poor conditions and trouble
getting health services.
I'm
wondering is there a plan in place to help improve conditions in Clarenville?
D. CHAFE:
We work with TI to make any
amendments to the building itself. But as each occurrence comes up that there's
a deficiency, we try to address those as quickly as possible.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Just
going back to the minister indicating that there have been partnerships with
John Howard and Stella Burry. Has there been any connection with the Elizabeth
Fry organization in terms of partnering with them?
D. MAHONEY:
We've had ongoing discussions
with the Elizabeth Fry organization. Just as recently as this morning, we had
received further communication from them. Myself and one of our ADMs will be
establishing a further meeting with them actually later this month.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
That's great to hear.
Thank
you.
CHAIR:
Your time has expired.
MHA
Evans.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Just
going back to 4.2.02, Youth Secure Custody, the change in Salaries. You said
there were vacant positions. I was just wondering, would you be able to tell us
what type of positions were vacant?
A. GREEN:
The vacancies would have been
youth care counsellors.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
Just
looking at the budget there in 4.2.02, Youth Secure Custody, was there
accommodation made for inflation?
J. HOGAN:
Sorry, can you repeat that?
L. EVANS:
Just looking at the Youth
Secure Custody, the budgets there, just due to inflation. Were there any
accommodations made because of the type of service that is provided?
A. GREEN:
No, there were no adjustments
made to the budget for inflation.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
That's
all my questions.
CHAIR:
MHA Conway Ottenheimer.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you.
Under
4.2.01, Adult Corrections, can the minister provide an overview of the capacity
of each of the correctional facilities, if they are full or have space
available, and, if so, how much?
D. CHAFE:
What was your question about capacity, sorry?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
I'm just wondering what
the capacity of each facility is: are they full, is there space available? If
there's space, how much?
D. CHAFE:
Sure.
So I'll
go down through each facility first, for capacity: HMP has 175; St. John's lock
up has 26 – and this is available beds, by the way – Women's Centre has 26;
Corner Brook detention centre has 17; and both LCC and the West Coast
Correctional Centre have 63.
We've
been lucky over the past couple of years with COVID that we've only been about
80 per cent full. Once the pandemic hit it seems like counts went down, which
allowed us the ability to move people around in spaces, so it's been good.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
That's good news.
With
respect to the Jesso report, I know this was raised earlier, and I know there
were, I believe, 17 recommendations. I understand that it was stated that most
of those recommendations have been implemented – I think it was stated. I'm just
curious which recommendations are outstanding.
D. WOODROW:
I think that at this point
the only recommendations that are left outstanding are in relation to the need
for the new facility. So there are things that we can address when we have the
new facility.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
Under
4.2.02, Youth Secure Custody, I just have a couple questions. Transportation and
Communications, last year there was savings of $9,000. Can you please provide
some detail?
A. GREEN:
That would be reduced resident and staff travel.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
And that would be, again,
due to COVID?
A. GREEN:
I can't say why there were reduced residents, but it could be attributed to
COVID?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
Professional Services, last year $275,500 was spent on Professional Services.
Can you please provide some detail on what professional services are included
here?
A. GREEN:
So the professional services here would be medical supports for the residents.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay.
And what
would those supports be, exactly?
A. GREEN:
That could be doctor, dentist, psychology or psychiatry.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
And the
last question on this heading for me is Revenue - Federal, there's a decrease in
the anticipated revenue for this year. Can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
The IRCS agreement, or the
Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision agreement, expired and it
wasn't finalized. It's being finalized now, but it wasn't finalized in time for
the budget. So when it's finalized you might see an increase in actual
expenditure next year and then that will be reflected on a go forward in the
budget.
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Okay, thank you.
That
concludes my questions for these Estimates.
CHAIR:
MHA Evans, are you concluded?
All
right, I ask the Clerk to recall the grouping.
CLERK:
Public Protection, 4.1.01 to
4.2.02 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 4.1.01 to 4.2.02
inclusive carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 4.1.01 through 4.2.02 carried.
CHAIR:
I ask the Clerk to call the
next grouping.
CLERK:
Fire and Emergency Services,
5.1.01 to 5.1.05 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 5.1.01 to 5.1.05 carry?
J. HOGAN:
Sorry, can we just take five
minutes? There's only one section left, I think we're making pretty good time,
actually, so can we just take five minutes?
H. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
That's fine by me.
CHAIR:
We're going to take five
minutes.
J. HOGAN:
Thanks.
Recess
CHAIR:
Okay, we'll start up again.
I ask
the Clerk to call the next grouping.
CLERK:
Fire and Emergency Services,
5.1.01 to 5.1.05 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 5.1.01 to 5.1.05
inclusive carry?
MHA
Wall.
J. WALL:
Thank you, Madam Chair.
5.1.01,
Salaries: Last year there was a salary savings of $38,800. Can you please give
us some details as to why?
A. GREEN:
That was a vacant position.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Can you
please tell us what the position was?
A. GREEN:
That would have been a fire
protection officer.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
Transportation and Communications, last year there was a savings of $42,500.
Despite saving money, the budget for this year's line item is still in the
$100,000 range. Can you please provide some insight on that?
A. GREEN:
To address the budget, we
would have built the budgets with a non-pandemic related expenditure. The reason
it was down was because our staff were not able to travel to attend training. We
hoping that that will be fully operational this year.
J. WALL:
Thank you for that.
Under
Supplies, last year Supplies were over by $32,300. I guess I might know the
answer, but can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
There were additional
supplies purchased. I think, in this case, there were some satellite radios that
we purchased that were aged out.
J. WALL:
Okay, thank you for that.
Satellite radios are quite important.
Under
Purchased Services, last year $110,600 was budgeted, $82,600 was spent and this
year is $102,500. Can you please provide some insight on this particular
variance?
A. GREEN:
So again, this is related to the pandemic and the training. So when they travel
for training, they have travel expenditure, but when they go to do the training,
they might need to rent a facility and AV equipment. So there's a reduction in
travel for training, which also impacted this line.
J. WALL:
Okay.
Does the
department have plans for training for this coming year?
A. GREEN:
Yes, the department would expect their mandate to be delivered as normal.
J. WALL:
Okay.
Under
Grants and Subsidies, can you please outline where the $216,000 went and why the
full amount was not disbursed?
A. GREEN:
The variance was due to the cancellation of the annual dinner for the NL
Association of Fire Services.
J. WALL:
Okay.
A. GREEN:
The grant for fire assistance – so we have $40,000 operating grant for
Newfoundland and Labrador Fire Services; there's the annual convention dinner,
which I referenced, which didn't occur. There's the Learn Not to Burn campaign,
which is $61,000, and there's funding for outside municipal boundaries regional
training initiatives, hazmat response, and hazmat training, which is
approximately $125,000.
J. WALL:
Okay, so the $40,000 for
training, that would be for volunteer firefighters throughout the province? Is
that the training you're referring to?
A. GREEN:
Yes.
J. WALL:
And that training will go
ahead this coming year?
A. GREEN:
That's the intent, yes.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
5.1.02, Salaries, despite having salary savings last year, the salary budget has
increased to $852,400. Can you please explain why?
A. GREEN:
So in this salary savings would have been a vacant position, and I believe it
was an emergency service – regional planning position that is currently vacant.
An increase in the budget for salaries here is the radio project, or the radios
– we have an announcement on the radio – like, there's money in here for radios.
There's an office for that radio division, and there are three positions for
that. As part of the recommendations for the GSAR inquiry, there's a position
here one time under Emergency Services that would work with NLSARA to support
the implementation of those recommendations.
J. HOGAN:
Yeah. Just two follow-ups on
that. You saw earlier there was a $900,000 increase for grants and that was the
NLSARA, but the budget would have said $1 million. So $100,000 is here, that's
where you get $1 million – you get $100,000 for the position and you get the
$900,000 for the grant that NLSARA can deal with as well.
The
province-wide radio was a large announcement in the budget yesterday. I think
we've had one individual working on this, just by himself, one person. So he's
carried a heavy load and, now, he's brought it to the point where a contract is
going to be signed. Obviously, now to implement that contract it is going to
cost money, we need people and we need resources. So that's what the funding is
for that.
J. WALL:
Thank you, Minister.
Under
Transportation and Communications, could you please explain to us why this line
item was over budget and $255,800 was spent? I'm also interested to know why the
budget is being increased to $293,000, please.
A. GREEN:
So the overage in the budget
would have been aerial support required for the South West rain event. The
increased budget is due to the radio's office. So there's intended travel for
that office to go out and implement training with respect to the new radios that
everyone will have.
J. WALL:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Professional Services, the budget for this year is $1,020,000. Can you please
outline what this will be for?
J. HOGAN:
That's the province-wide
radio project.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
Purchased Services, the budget this year is $13,997,200. Can you please outline
what that will be for?
J. HOGAN:
Again, that's for the
province-wide radio project. This number will be for start-up and early access
services that is going to be provided.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
5.1.03, Disaster Assistance, under Salaries, last year the Salaries budget went
over by $85,500. This year the budget is being increased to $275,900. Can you
please outline the staffing complement here, and what particular changes are
going to occur?
A. GREEN:
We only really generally have
one position here, so then we add staff. We have a bunch of temporary positions
that are open and available when we have events. We added staff to help
administer the event that occurred last year, in addition to an auditor position
that is required for final processing of previous old events.
J. WALL:
Okay, thank you.
Under
Professional Services, could you please explain the variance in that line item,
and what services would be included?
A. GREEN:
When Hurricane Larry hit,
there was an expenditure related to having an assessor go out. We didn't
anticipate that that was going to happen, so it happens and then we had to incur
the expenditures.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
Allowances and Assistance, could you please provide some context to this
particular line item?
A. GREEN:
What is included in this?
J. WALL:
Yes, please.
A. GREEN:
Allowances and Assistance is for claims under the DFA Program for personal
property.
J. WALL:
Okay. Thank you.
Under
Grants and Subsidies, the same thing. Could you please provide some context what
that's for.
A. GREEN:
Under the DFA Program that's for claims by municipalities.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
Under
Revenue - Federal, can you please give us an explanation regarding that
particular funding. There was nothing received last year and almost $21 million
expected this year.
A. GREEN:
The $6.8 million that we had budgeted for that was what we expected to be an
interim payment from a previous event; I think it was the Thanksgiving rainstorm
event from 2016. When we approached the federal government, they said we needed
to audit our expenditures first, which is why we hired the auditors. So that
claim was premature in our expectation for an interim payment.
Then,
the allocation for the $20.9 million – Heather, do you have that one?
H. JACOBS:
Yes, for the $20.9 million, we're expecting $17 million for the rainstorm in
2016; we're expecting $500,000 for Mud Lake and $4.4 million for Hurricane Larry
from the federal government.
J. WALL:
Thank you very much.
That is
all for me, Madam Chair.
CHAIR:
Thank you.
MHA
Evans.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
Most of
my questions have already been answered. I'm just looking at 5.1.03, Disaster
Assistance. We're already starting to see and feel the effects of climate change
impacting our properties and our ability to carry out a lot of our programs.
With
these effects being felt now – increased wind events, blizzards, floods,
hurricanes even – given that we're expecting more extreme weather events, are we
setting more money to deal with the damage?
J. HOGAN:
This entire portion of the
budget is based on the disaster assistance fund agreement with the feds.
L. EVANS:
Yeah.
J. HOGAN:
So when an event like that
occurs like what you're describing, we'll make an application, if it meets the
threshold, to apply to the federal government for assistance. A large chunk of
the money is coming from the federal government through this plan.
L. EVANS:
Yes but –
J. HOGAN:
It is difficult to budget for
weather events, as you can imagine.
L. EVANS:
Yeah. And also, there's a
delay in getting that money.
J. HOGAN:
It's quite clear that the
numbers here are jumping around; they're getting large and then going away and
coming back. It takes time to work through the details of the plan. The federal
government, obviously asking for audits, are making sure that we're being
thorough and they're being thorough before the money flows.
L. EVANS:
Yes, and like I said, there's
a delay in actually getting that money.
J. HOGAN:
Yes.
L. EVANS:
5.1.04, Fire Protection
Vehicles and Equipment, the budget for Grants and Subsidies has decreased. How
many vehicles are we buying this year?
H. JACOBS:
We hope to buy seven or eight
vehicles this year.
L. EVANS:
Do you have the areas that
they're going to be purchased allotted, identified?
H. JACOBS:
Not at this time. We have to
wait to receive the applications. The fire commissioner will evaluate them all
and then, in discussion with the minister, will determine the allocation.
L. EVANS:
Thank you.
5.1.05,
NL911, how do these numbers, the numbers that are listed there, reflect the
integration of the NL911 into your department?
J. HOGAN:
As you know, this is the
first time we'll take 911 into the Department of Justice and Public Safety. The
numbers reflect the same budget that's been used by NL911 the previous year.
L. EVANS:
Okay.
Spending
under Professional Services is projected to increase. What will the money for
this increase be spent on?
J. HOGAN:
That money is for the
contractual positions, the two PSAP contracts that we have with municipalities
in St. John's and Corner Brook. It's basically for the phone answering services.
L. EVANS:
Okay, thank you.
I'm done
with my questions.
CHAIR:
MHA Wall.
J. WALL:
Thank you, Madam Chair.
5.1.04,
Fire Protection Vehicles and Equipment. I have to ask: Can you please explain
why there's a decrease in that grant line from $2.7 million to $1.8 million. I
do know there's not less of a need across the province.
J. HOGAN:
You do know (inaudible) it's
less than the need.
Andrew
can correct me if I'm wrong here but I don't think it's a decrease. I think the
baseline is $1.8 million; the $2.7 million was a one-time increase.
J. WALL:
Thank you, Minister.
I know
my hon. colleague asked the question and the response was seven or eight
vehicles that were going to be purchased for $1.8 million. Do you have a
breakdown of what vehicles will be purchased for $1.8 million, because I know
from a pumper vehicle point of view it's $450,000 to $500,000. So for $1.8
million, do you know what the breakdown would be for those seven or eight
vehicles?
H. JACOBS:
Not at this time. We have to wait to receive the applications to see what they
are. Then the fire commission will sit down and review them all and then, in
consultation with the minister, they will determine the breakdown. It's not done
at this time; it's too early.
J. WALL:
Thank you.
So the
fire commissioner hasn't brought over the applications yet – the number of them?
Or he has received them but just that the department doesn't have them.
H. JACOBS:
I have not seen them at this time.
J. WALL:
Okay.
J. HOGAN:
I haven't seen the
applications either.
J. WALL:
Okay.
Can you
give us a time frame as to when that's going to roll out or what normally would
happen with respect to those applications?
J. HOGAN:
I can tell you what happened
last year. I know the applications, I think, were probably on my desk – I don't
know if I wasn't sworn in on April 8, 2021, to be honest with you. I think the
applications were probably on my desk that day and letters were written over the
course of – I mean, this is a subject to check – maybe six or eight months or
something like that, maybe a little bit sooner.
So it is
on my timeline, I guess, once I have the applications, to make the decision
about where the money goes, in consultation with the fire commissioner. It could
all be done on day one; it could be done the day before next year's budget.
J. WALL:
Thank you, Minister.
I do
appreciate last year when we were sworn in it was later in the year, but I have
heard from many municipalities with respect to Fire and Emergency Services
equipment and they are, no doubt, in dire need.
Minister, the funding that was going to be given out this year, how will that be
determined? Based on the need of the different areas of the province, I do know
that there are a vast number of outdated vehicles throughout our province and
that certainly makes a difference to the individuals in each municipality. How
will that funding be determined, just based solely on years of the
infrastructure?
J. HOGAN:
It is based on the
application. I assume anyone who is making an application is in need of whatever
they are asking for. Just to be clear, this is a program to assist
municipalities. It is not a responsibility of the Department of Justice and
Public Safety to provide all this equipment, fire trucks –
J. WALL:
Understood.
J. HOGAN:
That is just not possible,
financially. I understand that municipalities throughout the province are
looking for help and seeking help. But it is the responsibility of each
individual entity to staff up and to get equipment and trucks as they need.
Obviously, they do need assistance and this is the point of this program, but
this program can't be delivered to every fire hall in the province, there is
just not enough money.
J. WALL:
I understand. Thank you,
Minister.
Do you
have a dollar figure of the total ask for this year from municipalities?
J. HOGAN:
No, I haven't seen the
number.
J. WALL:
Okay.
J. HOGAN:
I'm going by memory, was it
$18 million last year was the ask? That would be subject to check as well.
H. JACOBS:
My understanding is that we have – the minister or I haven't seen these – we
have a $9.2 million in applications for fire trucks.
J. WALL:
Thank you for that.
Under
5.1.05, Professional Services, the budget for Professional Services is
increasing to $2,382,600. Can you please explain why and what services are
particularly included here?
A. GREEN:
So, again, this is a transition budget, so we would have taken the budget that
they would already had approved in the accruals for the previous year and the
expenditure is for the locations in the City of St. John's and Corner Brook to
provide call-centre services.
J. WALL:
Okay. Thank you for that.
That's
all the questions that I have, Madam Chair. I'd just like to say thank you to
the minister. No doubt an important role, but as equally important and,
depending on the day, more important from the team around you. So thank you very
much, I appreciate it.
CHAIR:
Okay, MHA Evans, are you
finished or do you have any additional questions?
L. EVANS:
No additional questions,
Chair, but I just wanted to make a comment while everyone is here.
During
COVID, we did move a lot to online and phone for court hearings and I just want
to make a statement that as COVID settles down, it's very important for us
actually move back, in my district, to the presence of individuals who are
participating, because court is very intimidating for people on the North Coast.
But, also, there's a culture of quietness and not really engaging in speaking.
And so
when, I guess your freedom is at stake, protection of individuals who are
showing up before the courts are at stake, it's very, very important for us to
have the court present. The lawyers, the defence and that interaction, that
social interaction that is so important to the individuals, whether they are the
defendant or the victim in a case.
So as we
move away from COVID, I just want to say to everyone here it's very, very
important for us to be able to go back to the way of dealing with things where
we do have a physical presence that would help people who are Innu and Inuit in
my district.
Thank
you.
CHAIR:
I ask the Clerk to recall the
grouping.
CLERK:
Fire and Emergency Services,
5.1.01 to 5.1.05 inclusive.
CHAIR:
Shall 5.1.01 to 5.1.05
inclusive carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
Carried.
On
motion, subheads 5.1.01 through 5.1.05 carried.
CHAIR:
I ask the clerk to call the
final vote.
CLERK:
The total.
J. HOGAN:
Can I make one comment
before?
CHAIR:
Yes.
J. HOGAN:
Sorry, we have an answer that
was one of MHA Conway Ottenheimer's questions that we were going to get later.
So I just get it now and put it on the record.
In terms
of vacancies, there are 65 vacancies greater than six months right now.
Sorry
about that, thank you.
CHAIR:
Okay, thank you.
Get the
Clerk to call the final vote.
CLERK:
The total.
CHAIR:
Shall the total carry?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
CHAIR:
Carried.
On
motion, Department of Justice and Public Safety, total heads, carried.
CHAIR:
Shall I report the Estimates
of the Department of Justice and Public Safety carried?
All
those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
On
motion, Estimates of the Department of Justice and Public Safety carried without
amendment.
CHAIR:
Just before we end, the next
meeting will be on April 12, at 6 p.m., it's the Municipal and Provincial
Affairs Estimates.
Can I
ask for a mover to adjourn the meeting?
L. EVANS:
So moved.
CHAIR:
The meeting has been
adjourned.
Thank
you.
On
motion, the Committee adjourned.