Amendment to bill not in order
By prior agreement Rural Secretariat estimates already dealt with under Resource Committee
Commissioner of Members' Interests and Chief Electoral Officer—Whether individual is entitled or not to be legally acting in the position
Decorum—If Members cannot converse without shouting, they should take conversations outside chamber
Decorum—Respect Members' wishes and ability to speak
Documents once tabled cannot be withdrawn
Inappropriate to refer to a Member's absence from the House
Language, Unparliamentary
"campaign of misinformation"
"cooked up"
"crackie"
"deliberately providing incorrect, misleading, untrue information"
"misleading and utterly false statements"
"nuisance"
Requesting Member to be generally more sensitive in his use of language
Table officers should never be referenced
Language, unparliamentary (from 2006 sitting of House)
Leave to table documents may be withdrawn
Member interfering with Speaker giving instructions to the House
Member should have reasonable opportunity to make a point
Member wishes to be heard before ruling is made
Members should address the Chair during debate and not get carried away by hecklers
Members should be referred to by their title or district
Members should be respected to speak without undue interruption
Ministerial Statements—Procedure for advance provision to opposition mismanaged
Ministers should be referred to by their title or portfolios, and members should be referred to by their Districts
Non-confidence motion ruled in order
Point of Privilege (from 2006 sitting of House)
Points of Order
Closure motion—Member had already spoken on amendment
Is ruling still expected on tabled public tender exceptions
Seeking explanation for rules
Whether decision of Chair of Committees is appealable to the Speaker
Whether parties get to speak to whether amendment is in order
Question Period—Member cut off by Speaker mid-question
Question Period—Members should keep questions and answers short
Question Period—Procedure not being followed by Speaker—Allegedly cut short Member twice
Question Period—Time is being expended on preambles
Request enforcement of rule of right for Member to be heard in silence
Resolutions
Standing Orders
Tabling documents under Answers to Questions for which Notice has been Given
To determine whether Member's time in budget debate had expired
Using new points of order to continue debate on a matter already decided is not permissible
Would amendment which stood as substantive motion under Standing Orders apply in case of second amendment