Admit that $375 million being asked from federal government will subsidize power costs in Nova Scotia rather than in Newfoundland and Labrador,
314–315
Based on consultants' forecasting, why inflate the projections used to cost out Holyrood,
1658
Can Premier tell employers how much more they are going to have to pay for energy as a result of the deal,
1541
Confirm Nalcor agreed to cover shortfall if link operating costs are twenty per cent more than Emera can cover,
55
Cost associated with contract awarded to SNC Lavalin for project design,
253
Cost increase for Province's ratepayers,
1659–1660
Explain why project is a good deal for Province when electricity costs will double within next year or two,
774–775
Given Dr. Wade Locke's dire forecast, how can Province afford to borrow another $4.4 billion for project,
1655–1656
Given that Emera owns link, why agree to pay half of cost overruns,
54
Given that project will likely go over budget, why agree to cover fifty per cent of cost overruns for Emera,
673
Has any economic analysis shown impact on cost of living in Province,
412
Has Premier considered the cost of living impact on business and consumers,
413
Has Premier read documentation on alternative projects,
1131
How can Minister see this as good deal when electricity rates will double for ratepayers,
1133
How can Premier expect people to believe power will be limited to island portion of Province,
561
How can Premier justify the need to develop a $4.5 billion project,
773
How can Premier lobby for grant to help subsidize electricity costs in Nova Scotia,
314
How can Premier say that we will need 80 per cent of power on island when she cannot justify 40 per cent at this stage,
561
How does Premier expect to transport power and sell it to the United States,
53
How does Premier respond to people having to pay more for power in Province than in the Maritimes,
466
How is it a good deal when a Nova Scotian company can get power for their business a lot cheaper than in Labrador,
411
How is it fair that people of Province should have to pay more for power than customers outside of Province,
513
How is project feasible if only selling forty per cent of the power,
1655
How much will Emera Earn from selling power to people in Province,
674
How much will Emera Energy profit,
1285
How much will Province's consumers pay to Emera for transmission,
675
How was fifty per cent projected rise in energy use arrived at,
139–140
How will cost overruns impact base cost of electricity if project goes over budget,
673
How will government ensure stable price, given cost overruns,
1022–1023
How will government pay for service without customers or access to transfer power,
106
How will Public Utilities Board review be conducted,
1288–1289
If Nova Scotia will get 20 per cent of power for free, how much are we selling the other 40 per cent for,
563
If Premier is committed to seeing power used for industrial purposes in Labrador, what rates will be offered to customers,
515
Impact of cost overrun at twenty, thirty or forty per cent,
1021
Impact on price of electricity for ratepayers, given a greater than ten per cent overrun,
1022
Impact on taxpayers if project goes thirty per cent over budget,
1073
Is Premier prepared to launch public hearings so that Public Utilities Board can do full review,
1289
Is Premier prepared to table audits and make them available to public,
1591
Is there anything in term sheet to prevent Emera from selling its shares to Hydro Quebec,
1504–1505
Isn't $6.2 billion a lot to pay for 20 per cent of electricity needed only a few months of the year,
50
Justify demand in power that indicates Muskrat Falls is cheapest power supply,
109–110
Produce information that shows rising energy demand,
614
Rationale for government deferring its financial return,
1075–1076
Request for full review by Public Utilities Board,
1348–1349
Table expenditures on Muskrat Falls and Lower Churchill Project by government and Nalcor,
615
Table information provided by government's Finance department on demand for power,
562
Table information showing demand and growth in province,
108
Table source of information for thirty-five per cent increase,
465
Table the demand statistics used to make conclusions about project,
562
Tell people what conditions are for Prime Minister's support,
355
Was Emera president wrong about province only needing power for the winter,
50
What concessions has Premier given for Prime Minister's support,
354–355
What has changed that we should trust Prime Minister on any deal he makes with Province,
313
What is Premier trying to keep from public and why not allow Public Utilities Board to do a full review,
1348
What justifies this deal,
1659
What kind of rationalization is it that a Nova Scotian company can get power cheaper from Muskrat Falls than it can in Labrador,
412
What rate can Labrador users expect to pay for this power,
514
What studies have been done to quantify impact of doubling electricity rates for seniors and those on fixed income,
734
What was trade-off for support on loan guarantee,
356
What will be commercial rate for power generated under Muskrat Falls,
1542
What will consumers pay if project goes fifty per cent over budget,
672
What will dollar figure be for Emera Corporation from Newfoundlanders and Labradorians,
1286
What will interconnected provincial grid mean to ratepayers in Labrador,
519
What would happen to economics of project, given a large cost increase,
1021
When was project exempted from scrutiny by the Province's utility board,
1286
Where are the identified buyers for this power,
1654
Where is new demand for power coming from,
107
Whether revenues from excess power would subsidize ratepayers in province,
467
Why allow Emera to draw down fifty years of power over thirty-five years,
613–614
Why did government agree to cover shortfall,
55–56
Why did Nalcor refuse to provide financial breakdown to Joint Review Panel,
1075
Why did Premier choose deal that sold twenty-nine per cent ownership to private Nova Scotia company,
774
Why did Premier provide wrong figure for percentage of Province's energy production at Holyrood,
1389–1380
Why do numbers not add up for this project,
772
Why does deal allow Emera to pay down investment earlier while Province will continue to pay for years,
613
Why does it make sense for Province's ratepayers to double their costs when power is sold cheaply outside of Province,
1452
Why force Province to pay more for power to benefit Nova Scotia,
733
Why give away power to Emera when it could be used in Labrador for industrial development,
142
Why has Minister agreed to cover fifty per cent of overruns on Maritime Link, but Emera is not responsible for any cost overruns,
674
Why insist Muskrat Falls is the only and cheapest way to decommission Holyrood,
51
Why insist on a project that is too costly,
1540
Why insist on developing project when outside users will get break on their power bill but people of province will not,
512–513
Why insist that people in Province pay double for electricity while Nova Scotia goes green at half cost,
732–733
Why is Premier limiting ability of Public Utilities Board to examine project,
1347
Why is Premier not considering cheaper options,
1132–1133
Why is Premier not dealing with Public Utilities Board and Auditor General,
1592
Why is Premier proceeding with project without buyers or contracts,
142
Why is Premier saying electricity will cost more regardless of project,
676
Why is Premier screening media questions,
312
Why is Premier stacking the odds in favour of the project by making Public Utilities Board examine alternatives that are not realistic,
1392
Why is Premier trying to pull wool over the eyes of the people of the Province on this deal,
734
Why make up numbers about increased demand,
107
Why mislead people to think that there will be a full and open process,
1593
Why negotiate deal leaving Province on hook for vast majority of cost overruns,
1074–1075
Why not commit to use revenues from excess power sales to offset cost to ratepayers,
833
Why not develop lower cost energy rather than trying to sell idea of project,
773
Why not make a deal that the people can profit from,
1541
Why not make available former Progressive Conservative Finance Minister's comments on energy costs and demands,
410
Why not place so-called subsection 92A option before the board for consideration,
1392
Why not refer matter to Public Utilities Board,
1393
Why not use revenues from sale of excess power to subsidize province's ratepayers,
514
Why overstate our reliance on Holyrood when it accounted for just eleven per cent of last year's electricity,
732
Why prioritize a project that will double people's electricity bills,
920
Why put people in debt to bring power to Avalon,
109
Why should Nalcor and Emera gain a profit and Nova Scotians get cheaper power while Province ratepayers pay more,
835
Why should Nalcor earn a profit but people in Province will pay more for electricity,
834
Why should Province's ratepayers pay more than people on the mainland,
1654
Why should ratepayers in Province have to pay for subsidized power for people of Nova Scotia,
563–564
Why should taxpayers foot bill for fifty per cent of overrun cost,
54,
55
Why trust Prime Minister when federal loan guarantee does not exist in budget,
313
Why was information not given to environmental panel,
141
Why will Emera not be on hook for any overruns on 29 per cent of transmission line,
1504
Why will Emera own link for thirty-five years yet Province will be on hook for half of cost overruns,
1503–1504
Why will Nova Scotians get clean energy without having to invest, while Province will have to pay more,
612–613
Why will Premier not provide detailed financial projections,
411
Why will rates go up by fifty per cent by 2016 if most of electricity is coming from cheap power in Bay d'Espoir,
676
Why won't excess power sales subsidize ratepayers in Province,
833–834
Why would Emera say there is not capacity and access,
53–54
Why would Nova Scotia pay for Muskrat Falls power if they can produce their own at less than ten cents per megawatt hour,
466
Will industrial customers in Labrador get a fair rate for their power or will it be cheaper for them to buy it from Nova Scotia,
516
Will industrial power that becomes available in Labrador be cheaper,
516
Will people of Province pay more for power than someone living in Maritimes,
560
Will Premier allow full and open process and not preside over a secret deal,
1391
Will Premier allow Public Utilities Board do its job,
1289–1290
Will Premier allow Public Utilities Board to conduct a full set of public hearings with no restrictions,
1390
Will Premier back up numbers for energy and construction costs, and for consumer demand,
410
Will Premier commit to bring down cost to commercial users on north and south coast of Labrador,
518
Will Premier commit to construction of transmission lines to north and south coasts of Labrador,
517,
518
Will Premier direct Nalcor to consider small hydro potential on island as alternative,
1131
Will Premier give something back to Labradorians by giving a good rate to commercial users,
518
Will Premier refer matter to Auditor General and refer it to full review of Public Utilities Board,
1592
Will Premier reveal source for her numbers of increased energy demand,
614–615
Will Premier reveal what alternatives to project were considered, and table those reports in House,
1130
Will Premier table information source of projected increase in energy use,
140–141
Will Premier tell Province what it is giving away to Emera Energy,
1503
Will project go through full review by the Public Utilities Board,
1288
Will Province have to give up any revenues on this project,
1076
Will Province have to pay base rate of 14.3 on electrical bill while Maritimers will pay ten cents or less,
467–468
Will Public Utilities Board have full scrutiny of deal to determine cost for province,
1287
Will taxpayers have to pay for entire project,
106
Without Emera's transmission capacity, how will energy get to market without building new transmission lines,
52–53