Auditing—Is Premier refusing to conduct audit for same reason he refused to release Oversight Committee reports
Auditing—Now that former Nalcor chair is no longer in Cabinet, will Premier now commit to undertake a forensic audit immediately
Auditing—Urging government to immediately conduct a forensic audit of the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project
Auditing—Will Premier establish an independent review and provide the findings to the people of Labrador
Auditing—Will Premier order a forensic audit
Contract—Have any discussions taken place in regard to the 2041 contract expiring
Contractors—Are the reports tabled today complete as laid out in the legislation and are the subsidiaries included
Contractors—Does the information tabled today include the summary of contracts entered into, and the identities of suppliers
Contractors—Does what minister tabled today include a summary of contracts entered into and the identity of suppliers to whom the contracts have been awarded every 6 months
Contractors—Does what the minister tabled conform to all requirements of the legislation
Contractors—Does what the minister tabled include the identities of suppliers, reported every six months
Contractors—Doesn't Premier think that the Oversight Committee should have been looking at how Nalcor was being managed, how the work was being done, and the use of embedded contractors
Contractors—For the third time, will minister table the legal interpretation
Contractors—Has information on identities of suppliers been demanded, and if so, why is it not made public
Contractors—If Premier was concerned about costly embedded contractors, why didn't he put this issue in EY's mandate for their review of Muskrat Falls
Contractors—Was information on embedded contractors provided
Contractors—Were regular reports received from Nalcor, and if so, was information on embedded contractors provided
Contractors—What has minister done in the last 24 hours to make sure that legislation has been complied with in relation to these tabled documents
Contractors—When did Premier learn of the 500 embedded contractors and the number that was out of whack
Contractors—When is government going to intervene with Nalcor to see that the exorbitant contractor costs are reined in
Contractors—Where in the Energy Corporation Act does it excuse identifying embedded contractors or suppliers
Contractors—Why hasn't minister tabled reports
Contractors—Why is Premier only dealing with the issue now
Contractors—Why was there no public mention of the 500 embedded contractors working on the project
Contractors—Will minister table legal interpretation indicating that it does not include embedded contractors, but is only about process
Contractors—Will minister table legal interpretation that she spoke about
Contractors—Will minister table the legal interpretation
Contractors—Wouldn't Premier have expected something like this to be mentioned by the Oversight Committee in their reports
Energy Corporation Act—What changes does minister anticipate need to be made to the act to make information open and transparent
EY report—Could minister release the reports so all of the province can validate exactly what it is she is saying
EY report—Has a draft report been received by the department
EY report—Has report recommendation to implement enhanced independent assurance functions been done, or will it be done
EY report—How is minister conducting business in her department
EY report—How long does minister intend for the finalization of the report to take place
EY report—How much has been spent to date on report
EY report—If report is so important and the recommendations are so significant, why hasn't minister released it
EY report—When will report be finished and released
EY report—When will report be released
EY report—When will we see final report and the costs associated with it
EY report—Where is the openness and transparency that were promised, and when will minister release all of the reports for 2016
EY report—Why is EY being given a blank cheque to stay on indefinitely with no idea of what their scope of work is
EY report—Will minister release the report as it is before government gets a chance to liberalize it
Independent Expert Advisory Committee
Inquiry—Can Premier be more specific about his plans for the inquiry
Inquiry—Can Premier clarify whether Justice LeBlanc drafted the terms of reference, or whether the Dept. of Natural Resources provided direction
Inquiry—Can Premier tell us when inquiry is going to happen
Inquiry—Could a different minister be responsible and could it have been a different minister who drafted the terms of reference
Inquiry—Did Premier consult with anyone other than the Commissioner about having the possibility of the inquiry and the report completed before the next provincial election
Inquiry—Does minister see a possibility of a conflict happening, if minister might become a witness in this inquiry
Inquiry—Does the scope of the inquiry include management and leadership of the project over the last two years or does it not
Inquiry—If Commissioner asked to broaden the scope of the inquiry, will the government commit to making sure the public is aware of that request
Inquiry—Is minister saying that Dept. of Natural Resources did have input and was part of the process of developing the terms of reference
Inquiry—Is the commissioner able to add to the scope of the inquiry
Inquiry—What safeguards are in place to ensure that the current government cannot politicize this very important inquiry
Inquiry—When does Premier expect to release the terms of the inquiry, and when is the anticipated start date
Inquiry—When something comes up during the inquiry which wasn't seen or anticipated, can the Commissioner add to the scope of the inquiry
Inquiry—Who developed the terms of reference
Inquiry—Why did Premier push blindly on with the project, only to begin the inquiry today
Inquiry—Why didn't Premier make a forensic audit a condition of the terms of reference for the inquiry
Inquiry—Why do terms of inquiry not clearly outline the decisions made over the past two years
Inquiry—Why does inquiry not include anything that's happened over the last two years
Inquiry—Will all decisions made on Muskrat Falls in the past two years be included as part of the inquiry
Inquiry—Will all the circumstances and details related to the process in Labrador, especially methylmercury, be included in the inquiry
Inquiry—Will assessments and review leading to endorsing the project and providing the loan guarantees be part of the inquiry
Inquiry—Will it be made public if Justice LeBlanc wishes to expand the scope of the inquiry and will government approve it
Inquiry—Will Premier commit to ensuring that before a full blown inquiry is done, a forensic audit of the project is completed, possibly by the Auditor General, which looks at the procurement of contracts and all of the things that could feed into an inquiry
Inquiry—Will Premier commit to ensuring that the terms of reference be drafted by an individual or group that is independent of government
Inquiry—Will Premier commit to the inquiry being completed and a report made public before the next general election
Inquiry—Will Premier consult with experts and concerned members of the public before drafting the terms of reference
Inquiry—Will Premier ensure that a forensic audit precedes or is part of the inquiry
Inquiry—Will Premier follow through with his promise and ensure that all the information is made public
Inquiry—Will Premier make sure a full review of all decisions made over the past two years are included as part of the inquiry
Inquiry—Will Premier make sure the inquiry happens and it's delivered before the next general election
Inquiry—Will Premier produce concrete proof of what it is that made it impossible to pause the project in 2015 to review where things stood
Inquiry—Will Premier show us the evidence he used for dragging his feet for two years, and for not stopping the project
Inquiry—Will the Astaldi contract renewal be included as part of the inquiry work
Inquiry—Will the management of the project, including procurement and oversight activities over the last two years be included in the terms of reference
Inquiry—Will the review be right up to date, in terms of what decisions have been made
Inquiry—Will the surprise of an additional billion dollars being added onto the project be part of the scope of the inquiry
Inquiry—Will the terms of reference come back to the House of Assembly
Loan guarantee
Methylmercury—Can Premier give people who live downstream from Muskrat Falls a timeline on when promise to release water from the reservoir will be kept
North Spur—Urging government to consider the establishment of an independent expert review of the North Spur
Oversight Committee letter showing project cost schedules and related risks
Oversight report—Are there ongoing invoices related to the Oversight Committee and EY doing work for that committee
Oversight report—Is it EY or the Oversight Committee who is finalizing the report
Oversight report—What is the final cost of the EY report, particularly the interim and final report
Oversight report—When can people expect oversight report from government
Oversight report—When did minister find out that the Oversight Committee was too busy to report quickly, and what actions did she take to have them meet their quarterly reporting requirements
Oversight report—When will government release its liberalized report
Oversight report—When will government release the oversight reports that have not been released since December 2015
Oversight report—When will Premier direct minister to release oversight reports
Oversight report—Why has it not been a priority to provide updates on the oversight of Muskrat Falls, as had been committed to
Oversight report—Why would Oversight Committee be working to finalize what is supposed to be an independent report
Oversight report—Will minister table the draft that has been submitted to the Oversight Committee
Oversight report—Will Premier direct minister to release Oversight Committee reports
Oversight—Will minister make true cooperation possible in the House and strike a select parliamentary committee to deal with the legislative oversight of the project
Public Tender Act—Does Premier even know that he has the power to put Muskrat Falls under the Public Tender Act
Public Tender Act—Why would Premier not use section 17.1(2) of the Energy Corporation Act to require that Muskrat Falls be subject to the Public Tender Act
Rates—If Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro cannot mitigate rates now, how can Muskrat Falls' power possibly be made affordable
Rates—What was Premier's plan to help seniors, working families and small businesses with the doubling of their power bills
Revenue—Which is correct, that the Premier says there's no revenue, or that the Auditor General report indicates $1.1 billion in revenue by 2022-2023
Royalties and Benefits—Can minister account for the difference in what was budgeted and what was spent
Royalties and Benefits—Why was almost $4 million overrun on professional services in the Royalties and Benefits division in 2016-2017
Select committee—How can minister assure people's confidence, if not by collaboration with Members who have been elected by the people
Select committee—Will minister make true cooperation possible in the House and strike a select parliamentary committee to deal with the legislative oversight of the project
SNC-Lavalin report—Does it not cause the Premier concern that his Chief Executive Officer withheld the report from him
SNC-Lavalin report—Does it not cause the Premier concern that this important information was hidden from government for a full year
SNC-Lavalin report—When did minister learn of and receive a copy of the 2013 report which they falsely claim was given to the former administration
Transmission line—Could minister confirm whether the province is acting at the request of Ottawa, or was government driving the initiative
Transmission line—Has the Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor been involved in any way in discussions about a national electricity transmission line
Transmission line—Has the Chief Executive Officer of Nalcor recused himself to avoid any appearance of possible conflict
Transmission line—Have discussions taken place with Minister Carr in relation to a possible transmission link, and is it tied to current or future development in Labrador
Transmission line—What elected officials has federal minister spoken with regarding regional transmission line linking Quebec to the Atlantic provinces
Transmission line—What will the role of the existing Maritime Link be in any transmission deal with Quebec
Transmission line—Will any future agreements have transmission infrastructure beginning in Labrador as the beginning of the east-west hydroelectricity grid
Transmission line—Will minister confirm her position that it needn't start in Labrador and go east to west
Transmission line—Will Premier finally keep his promise on an open and transparent government and tell people what's happening now and keep them informed
Transmission line—Would government support a federal Quebec transmission line that excludes Labrador and would go south through Quebec, rather than start in Labrador
Transmission structures—Can minister confirm or deny if there have been hundreds of defects identified through this inspection process
Transmission structures—Can minister confirm or deny whether some of the deficiencies relate to welding
Transmission structures—Can minister confirm that there are no defects on the power lines, guidewires, towers or any associated aspects of those structures related to the transmission assets of the Muskrat Falls project
Transmission structures—Is minister trusting discussions she has had or has she read the inspection reports herself
Transmission structures—Once received, will minister make inspection reports available
Urging government to immediately conduct a forensic audit of the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project
Water levels