Admit loss of pellet plant will devastate Labrador West
Affirm support for expansion of pellet plant to occur in Labrador West
Notice of motion
Debate
Amendment—Moved
Amendment—Carried,
1537
Motion—Carried,
1537
Can Minister advise whether meetings took place with Hatch
Condemning government's support of company's decision to process Labrador resources in Sept-Iles
Byrne, E.,
2096–2097
Byrne, J.,
1559–1561,
1595–1597,
1775–1776,
1820–1821
Canning,
1449–1453
Furey,
1477
Grimes,
1456–1457,
1598–1599,
1642–1643,
1777–1779,
1867–1868,
2095–2096,
2099
Harris,
1448–1449,
1453–1454,
1475–1476,
1555–1556,
1641–1642,
1819–1820,
1865–1866,
2071–2072,
2131–2132
Hodder, H.,
1993–1994,
2094–2095,
2132–2133
Osborne, S.,
1476–1477,
1602–1603,
1819,
1866,
1960
Osborne, T.,
1597–1598,
1868–1869,
1959–1960,
1992–1993,
2214–2215
Ottenheimer,
1558–1559
Shelley,
1446–1448,
1516,
1556–1558,
1640–1641,
1817–1818,
2069–2071,
2093–2094,
2213–2214
Sullivan,
1454–1456,
1776–1777,
2097–2098
Tobin,
1561–1564
Confirm loss of salaries and royalties
Did Minister consider impact of massive job losses on the treasury
Hatch report—Confirm study did not include cost of interest free loan or manpower training
Hatch report—Confirm study did not include cost of upgrading hydro line
Hatch report—Confirm that camp house was unnecessary
How much of entire royalty regime comes from company
Is Minister not concerned that allowing company to separate aspects of business could impact Voisey's Bay or Inco
Is Premier aware that there will be an additional 400-500 people laid off
Lack of analysis of benefit of construction jobs in Labrador
Reverse decision of Government to support company's export of Labrador ore for processing in Sept Iles
Support for policy of secondary processing in Province
Ten year summary of taxes and royalties from company
Was royalty regime ever discussed in negotiations leading up to decision
What is current royalty regime
Why didn't Government discuss possibility of changing royalty regime
Why didn't Minister discuss royalty regime
Why has Government done an about face regarding move of pellet plant
Why not consider amending the Labrador Mining & Exploration Act as it affects the company
Will Minister table legal opinion for not proclaiming the legislation
Will Premier reverse support for company's decision to expand pellet plant
Would Minister table royalties for last year